CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06697873Updated Nov 20, 2024

Effects of Rhythmic Stabilization With and Without Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises Among Fast Bowlers

An interventional study of Experimental Group: A and Experimental: Group B in Sports Physical Therapy, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-20.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2023, registered Nov 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Effects of Rhythmic stabilization with and without Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises on upper body strength, endurance and balance among fast bowlers

Read the detailed description

The literature mostly ignores the specific needs of fast bowlers in favor of concentrating on general strength and fitness for cricket players. Exercises for rhythmical stabilization, which improve neuromuscular control and stability, are not given much attention. There is not enough research done on closed chain workouts in cricket-specific contexts. Closed chain exercises replicate the weight transfer and ground response forces during quick bowling. There is a paucity of literature offering fast bowlers-specific evidence-based training routines, despite the unique demands of cricket. Coaches and practitioners are less able to create interventions that target the specifics of the fast bowling motion in the literature because there aren't many exercises specifically designed for cricket.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sports Physical Therapy

Keywords

  • Balance
  • Rhythmical Exercise
  • Strength Training
  • Endurance
  • Physical
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Male athlete (16) Age of 18-35 years (17) Minimum of 6 months training experience (18) Healthy weight with BMI in category of 18.5 to 24.9 (15).

-

Exclusion Criteria: Joint or bone disease such as rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis of the upper extremity (19).

Cervical spine pathology (20) Serious injury or history of surgery in the past year Any recent upper limb fracture Chronic limb discomfort or limitations that had a negative effect on exercises (e.g., shoulder pain and lateral epicondylitis) (20) Shoulder instability to be tested via load and shift test (21).

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group:A

    21 participants will receive both Rhythmical stabilization and closed chain kinetic exercise followed by a warm up session with stretching 5 minutes and cool down session with 5 minutes

    Other: Experimental Group: A

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group:B

    21 participants will receive Rhythmical stabilization training program followed by a warm up session with stretching 5 minutes and cool down session with 5 minutes.

    Other: Experimental: Group B

Interventions

  • OtherExperimental Group: A

    21 participants will receive both Rhythmical stabilization and closed chain kinetic exercise followed by a warm up session with stretching 5 minutes and cool down session with 5 minutes

  • OtherExperimental: Group B

    21 participants will receive Rhythmical stabilization training program followed by a warm up session with stretching 5 minutes and cool down session with 5 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 1 repetition maximum bench press test (1RM)

    The participant laid in a supine position with chin at the level of the padded surface of the bench. The starting position is when the hands are grasped slightly wider (\~5cm) than the shoulder width and arms fully extended. From this position the weights pulled upwards with the elbows leading the barbell struck the underside of the bench and lowered to starting position. The posture to be adapted in bench press is as follows subject lays supine on the bench with eyes to be locked on the bar and the feet were planted on the ground with the lumbar region arched. The hand grip is to be 1.5 times the shoulder's width. The barbell is to be removed from the rack, lowered and to be paused briefly before being racked. A spotter is to be always placed behind the athlete

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Repetitive push up test

    The push up floor exercise is to be performed on a flat, stable surface, with the hands placed wider than the shoulder width. The body is aligned to the floor. For the repetition to be counted the athlete must go in a full range of motion, and the formation of 900 at the elbow at the end of the eccentric phase of the exercise

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUES Test)

    CKCUEST is used for the evaluation of upper extremity strength, endurance and closed kinetic chain. The execution of the test is as follows. In push up position the two hands are to be placed at 90 cm, then one hand is to extend, and reach touch the other hands within a time of 15 seconds

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Upper extremity Y-Balance Test

    The YBT is a simple balance testing method to identify injury risks and functional asymmetries in an athlete. Each upper extremity is tested separately. The 3 lines each have a 1350 angle. The participant is placed in a push up position with the base of the proximal 3rd metacarpophalangeal joint placed at the center of the y balance board. The participant moves the hand in all 3 directions (medial, inferolateral and superolateral directions) as shown in the second figure below.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pakistan Sports Academy
    Lahore, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Catikkas F, Kurt C, Atalag O. Kinanthropometric attributes of young male combat sports athletes. Coll Antropol. 2013 Dec;37(4):1365-8. PubMed 24611359 ↗
  • da Silva BV, Simim MA, Marocolo M, Franchini E, da Mota GR. Optimal load for the peak power and maximal strength of the upper body in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Jun;29(6):1616-21. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000799. PubMed 25486298 ↗
  • Kizilay F, Cengiz DU. A comparison of functional vestibulo-ocular reflex and proprioception in athletes of combat sports and ball sports. Heliyon. 2023 Jun 25;9(7):e17540. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17540. eCollection 2023 Jul. PubMed 37455947 ↗
  • Singla D, Hussain ME. Variations in cricket players' upper body dynamic balance across different levels of competition. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2020 Jun 1;33(5). doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2019-0015. PubMed 32474453 ↗
  • Vaidya SS, Agarwal B, Singh Y, Mullerpatan R. Effect of Yoga on Performance and Physical Fitness in Cricket Bowlers. Int J Yoga Therap. 2021 Jan 1;31(1):Article_10. doi: 10.17761/2021-D-20-00060. PubMed 34551075 ↗
  • Herridge R, Turner A, Bishop C. Monitoring Changes in Power, Speed, Agility, and Endurance in Elite Cricketers During the Off-Season Period. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Aug;34(8):2285-2293. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002077. PubMed 28658073 ↗
  • Doma K, Leicht A, Woods C, Harrison D, McGuckin T, Connor J. Effect of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage on Bowling-Specific Motor Skills in Male Adolescent Cricketers. Sports (Basel). 2021 Jul 19;9(7):103. doi: 10.3390/sports9070103. PubMed 34357937 ↗
  • Ramachandran AK, Singh U, Connor JD, Doma K. Biomechanical and physical determinants of bowling speed in cricket: a novel approach to systematic review and meta-analysis of correlational data. Sports Biomech. 2024 Mar;23(3):347-369. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1858152. Epub 2021 Jan 11. PubMed 33428558 ↗
  • Dionisio VC, de Baptista CRJA, Rodrigues AS, de Souza LAPS. Is it possible to stabilize the trunk using rhythmic stabilization in the upper limb? A cross-sectional study of asymptomatic individuals. J Man Manip Ther. 2018 Aug;26(4):212-217. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1467994. Epub 2018 May 7. PubMed 30083044 ↗
  • Pozzi F, Plummer HA, Sanchez N, Lee Y, Michener LA. Electromyography activation of shoulder and trunk muscles is greater during closed chain compared to open chain exercises. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2022 Feb;62:102306. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 12. PubMed 31151784 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06697873
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 20, 2024
Start date
Nov 23, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2024
Completion
May 30, 2024
Last update
Nov 20, 2024

Study contacts

Ahad Hussain, DPT
principal investigator · Riphah Internation Univeersity

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion