CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06696482EASTUpdated Nov 20, 2024

Effort and Antidepressant Study Test

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Escitalopram 10mg and Placebo 10 mg in Effort Based Decision Making, Prosocial Behavior and Apathy, sponsored by University of Oxford. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-20.

Sponsored by University of Oxford · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the behavioural effects and neural correlates of increasing serotonin levels in healthy volunteers, through a 7-day course of the SSRI escitalopram, on an effort-based decision-making task measuring self-benefiting and prosocial behaviours.

Read the detailed description

This study investigates the mechanisms behind motivation and apathy, focusing on how effort is dedicated to both self-benefiting and prosocial actions. Diminished motivation, often manifesting as apathy, is associated with poor health outcomes and is common in neurological disorders like Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and small vessel cerebrovascular disease (SVD). While brain regions like the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), and anterior insula (AI) are known to regulate motivation in reward-based decision-making for personal gain, prosocial motivation remains underexplored. Prosocial behaviour involves actions that benefit others and contribute to physical and psychological well-being. Recent studies suggest unique neural activity in the anterior cingulate gyrus (ACCg) during prosocial actions, differing from self-benefiting behaviour.

To the best of our knowledge, there is no prior evidence on how SSRIs might influence prosocial motivation or its neural correlates. This study will address this gap by examining SSRI effects on effort-based prosocial decision-making, potentially identifying novel insights into the neural mechanisms underlying motivation for prosocial behaviour.

02

Conditions studied

  • Effort Based Decision Making
  • Prosocial Behavior
  • Apathy

Keywords

  • fMRI
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Oxford is the lead sponsor of 794 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the research
  • Aged 18 to 40 years
  • Sufficient knowledge of English language to understand and complete study tasks
  • Right-handed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or past probable diagnosis of psychiatric illness, according to DSM-5 criteria requiring intervention by a healthcare professional, including but not limited to psychosis, bipolar disorder, major depression, OCD, PTSD, substance abuse disorder or any eating disorder
  • Current or past diagnosis of any significant personality disorder (e.g., borderline personality disorder) according to self-report
  • Diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactive disorder or autistic spectrum disorder that impairs daily functioning, requires pharmacotherapy or in the opinion of the study medic would affect the scientific integrity of the study
  • Current use of medication that might interact with the effects of escitalopram or affect the scientific integrity of the study
  • Previous suicide attempt or previous prolonged period (eg., > 5 days) of thought to end life
  • Known contraindication to escitalopram including: past allergic reaction to escitalopram or any other medicines, diagnosis of angle-closure glaucoma, or current use of any other medication whose use interacts with escitalopram (according to BNF guidance) e.g. associated with prolonged QT-interval
  • Any other current or past medical conditions which in the opinion of the study medic may interfere with the safety of the participant or the scientific integrity of the study including epilepsy/seizures, brain injury, hepatic or renal disease, diabetes, severe gastro-intestinal problems, Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours, neurobiological conditions
  • First-degree relative with a diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum or other psychotic disorder, or bipolar disorder
  • Severely underweight (BMI\<17) or very obese (BMI>40) in a manner that renders them unsuitable for the study in the opinion of the study medic
  • Heavy use of cigarettes (smoke>20 cigarettes per day)
  • Heavy use of caffeine (drink>4 x 250 ml cups/cans of coffee/energy drinks per day)
  • Lactose intolerance (due to the study involving administration of a lactose placebo tablet)
  • Pregnancy (as determined by urine pregnancy test taken during the Part 2 screening visit), breast feeding or plans to become pregnant
  • Past history of dependence on illicit substances or regular illicit substances use within the previous three months
  • Evidence of current or past harmful use of alcohol
  • Previous participation in a study involving the tasks used in this study or involving use of escitalopram in the last year in the Department of Psychiatry (University of Oxford)
  • Physical (including visual and auditory) or language impairment that would make complying with the study protocol challenging.
  • Participant is unlikely to comply with the clinical study protocol or is unsuitable for any other reason, in the opinion of the investigator
  • Not suitable for MRI neuroimaging, e.g., difficulty remaining still for duration of scan
  • Any MRI contraindications outlined in FMRIB 3 Tesla scanning safety form
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Escitalopram

    Escitalopram tablets 10 mg once daily for 7 days

    Drug: Escitalopram 10mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Lactose tablets 10 mg once daily for 7 days

    Drug: Placebo 10 mg

Interventions

  • DrugEscitalopram 10mg

    Escitalopram 10 mg, encapsulated in an opaque capsule to facilitate blinding of participant and researcher

  • DrugPlacebo 10 mg

    Placebo 10 mg, encapsulated in an opaque capsule to facilitate blinding of participant and researcher

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effort-based decision-making task for self-benefiting and prosocial behaviours: behavioural correlates

    In the fMRI scanner task, participants are prompted to choose between two offers on each trial. One option allows them to earn a low reward for minimal effort (rest), while the other presents a variable higher-reward, higher-effort (work) of the same duration. The low-reward, low-effort offer earns 1 point without exertion. Higher-reward, higher-effort offers range from 2 to 10 points (in 2-point-increments) and effort varies from 30% to 70% (in 10% increments) of their MVC. Each trial differs in whether the outcome is delivered to the participant themselves (self) or someone else (prosocial). Effort levels for each offer are visually represented using coloured portions of a pie chart and rewards (points) are displayed in colour below.

    Time frame: Day 7 of treatment

  2. Effort-based decision-making for self-benefiting and prosocial behaviours: Neural correlates

    Activity of brain regions associated with self-benefiting and prosocial behaviours

    Time frame: Day 7 of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Emotional processing: Faces task

    During the emotional processing face task participants will be presented with pictures of emotional faces and asked to label the emotions into different categories.

    Time frame: Day 7 of treatment

  2. Prosocial behaviour: Social learning task

    This game involves making fictitious investment decisions with other "previous participants in our lab" (programmed responses) and trying to maximize the number of points earned in the game.

    Time frame: Day 7 of treatment

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Research data will be anonymised and then processed for analysis. Anonymised data will be made available post-publication on Open Science Framework (OSF). we plan to share normalised MRI data (such that unique brain structure is not shared) into an online scientific data sharing repository such as 'Zenodo'

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06696482
Lead sponsor
University of Oxford
Collaborators
Wellcome Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 20, 2024
Start date
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 20, 2024

Study contacts

Eva Periche-Tomas, PhD
Contact
eva.perichetomas@psych.ox.ac.uk
+44 (0) 1865613128
Catherine J Harmer, PhD
principal investigator · University of Oxford

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion