CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06693596MY-IOTAUpdated Nov 18, 2024

Masses in Young Patients - International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (MY-IOTA)

An observational study in Adnexal Mass, Adnexal Tumor and Adnexal Cyst, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to female participants aged 0 Years to 20 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-18.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
0 Years to 20 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This multicenter observational study aims to validate the IOTA Simple Rules, Benign Descriptors, and ADNEX model in a cohort of patients equal or under the age of 20. Moreover, the study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of subjective assessment by ultrasound and to analyze the rate of complications in patients treated conservatively.

Read the detailed description

Ovarian masses are uncommon in children, with an estimated annual incidence of 2.6/100,000. They are most identified in the neonatal period or around the time of menarche. Most ovarian cysts are benign and 55-70% of which are mature cystic teratomas. In most cases, patients are asymptomatic and the ovarian lesions are incidentally detected through ultrasound examinations. However, up to 15% of cases may involve abdominal pain and torsion. Furthermore, despite the low incidence of ovarian cancer (less than 1% of all pediatric cancers), the possibility of malignant tumor must be addressed.

In 2018, a national survey of pediatric surgeons in the UK revealed significant variability in the strategies employed for investigating and surgically managing adnexal lesions in children and adolescents. Although there is a spread consensus that ultrasound indices are useful for distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions in pediatric patient, the evidence available for this specific population is limited and it lacks comprehensive data from large cohorts. Moreover, existing models developed by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group, such as the Simple Rules, Benign Descriptors, and ADNEX model, have not been validated in this younger population. Additionally, it is still unclear if these tools remain validated with a transabdominal approach, primarily used for children and non-sexually active adolescents.

The primary objective of this prospective study is therefore to assess the performance of these existing ultrasonography-based risk tools in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses in neonates, young girls and adolescents using transabdominal and/or transvaginal ultrasound.

Secondary aims are the diagnostic accuracy of subjective assessment by ultrasound, the understanding of the natural history of adnexal masses at 6-8 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months and the assessment of the complications rate (such as rupture, torsion, or malignancy) in patients treated conservatively.

Final outcome will be based on pathology in patients who undergo surgery and on pattern recognition, i.e. subjective assessment of ultrasound examiner, in patients managed conservatively for masses where morphology remains unchanged during follow-up.

The study will be conducted over a minimum of two years. We anticipate recruiting 1000 surgically managed masses over a 24-month period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adnexal Mass
  • Adnexal Tumor
  • Adnexal Cyst
  • Adnexal Masses in Young Girls and Adolescents

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • IOTA
  • ovarian mass
  • benign
  • malignant
  • Young patients
03

In context

Ovarian Neoplasms

2,695 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms; 727 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 200 across 527 observational studies indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms.

Browse Ovarian Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 928 studies on the registry; 261 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years to 20 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients under 18 years of age newly diagnosed with adnexal masses in the study centre (UZ Leuven) or in one of the other affiliated hospitals and who underwent both conservative and surgical management.

Inclusion criteria

All newly diagnosed adnexal masses identified in a girl or adolescent aged 20 or under.

Exclusion criteria

  • Exclusion Criteria:

Participants eligible for this study must not meet any of the following criteria:

  • Non-adnexal masses e.g. peritoneal inclusion cysts (where diagnosis is certain) and peritoneal carcinomatosis with no adnexal mass;
  • The denial or withdrawal of written informed consent.
  • Pregnancy at any timepoint during the study period
  • In premenarchal participants: follicle measuring \<10mm
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Group 1: Surgical management

    Patients aged ≤ 20 years of age recommended for surgery at that visit due to a suspicion of malignancy or pain.

    Procedure: Group 1: Surgical management

  • Group 2: Conservative management (follow-up)

    Patients aged ≤ 20 not recommended for surgery due to suspicion of malignancy/complications, for which subjective impression was benign for all visits, and for which the tumour was still present at the next visit.

    Diagnostic Test: Group 2: Conservative management (follow-up)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testGroup 2: Conservative management (follow-up)

    A standardised transabdominal examination is performed, including color or power Doppler examination. Transvaginal ultrasonography can be performed in sexually active adolescents with consent. Transrectal examination is also acceptable for younger patients who are not sexually active. All the variables required for the Simple Rules, simple descriptors and ADNEX model are assessed. Before entering ultrasound information about the tumour and getting model results, the ultrasound examiner' s diagnosis (benign, borderline, malignant; specific diagnosis) based on subjective assessment is recorded. Results based on Simple Rules, simple descriptors and ADNEX model are documented as well. If the adnexal mass is seen and if the decision is to manage the adnexal mass conservatively, the patient will be re-scanned at 6 weeks (maximal range 6-8 weeks), 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) and 12 months (maximal range 10-14 months)

    Also known as: Ultrasound Assessment

  • ProcedureGroup 1: Surgical management

    A standardised transabdominal examination is performed, including color or power Doppler examination. Transvaginal ultrasonography can be performed in sexually active adolescents with consent. Transrectal examination is also acceptable for younger patients who are not sexually active. All the variables required for the Simple Rules, simple descriptors and ADNEX model are assessed. Before entering ultrasound information about the tumour and getting model results, the ultrasound examiner' s diagnosis (benign, borderline, malignant; specific diagnosis) based on subjective assessment is recorded. Results based on Simple Rules, simple descriptors and ADNEX model are documented as well. If the patient requires surgery, no further ultrasound scans will be required.

    Also known as: Surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Estimation of the ability of the ADNEX model without CA125 to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses when detected in patients aged 20 or under (AUC)

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). This will be done using the estimated probability of malignancy, which equals 1 minus the estimated probability of a benign tumor. 95% confidence intervals provided. Analysis will be done twice: for subgroup 1 and for subgroups 1 and 2 combined.

    Time frame: Outcome based on histology for group 1 assessed at 12 months after recruitment or no sign of malignancy during the ultrasound follow-up for group 2 assessed up to 12 months after recruitment.

  2. Estimation of the ability of the ADNEX model and subjective assessment to classify adnexal masses as benign or malignant when detected in patients aged 20 or under (Sensitivity, Specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value)

    Sensitivity, Specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Providing 95% confidence intervals and ,for ADNEX, Using several cut-offs on the risk of malignancy. Analysis will be done twice: for subgroup 1 and for subgroups 1 and 2 combined.

    Time frame: Outcome based on histology for group 1 or follow-up for group 2 (maximum 12 months after recruitment)

  3. Estimation of the ability of the ADNEX model to predict individual risk of malignancy of adnexal masses when detected in patients aged 20 or under (Calibration)

    O:E ratio, and generate a flexible calibration curve. Analysis will be done twice: for subgroup 1 and for subgroups 1 and 2 combined.

    Time frame: Outcome based on histology for group 1 or follow-up for group 2 (maximum 12 months after recruitment)

  4. Estimation of the ability of the Benign Descriptors to detect malignancies in patients aged 20 or under.

    Number and percentage of patients that fit any BD, only BD1, only BD2, only BD3, and only BD4 and percentage of malignancies among patients that fit any BD, only BD1, only BD2, only BD3, only BD4. We provide 95% confidence intervals for every result.

    Time frame: Outcome based on histology for group 1 or follow-up for group 2 (maximum 12 months after recruitment)

  5. Estimation of the ability of the ADNEX model without CA125 to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses when detected in patients aged 20 or under (AUC)

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). This will be done using the estimated probability of malignancy, which equals 1 minus the estimated probability of a benign tumor. 95% confidence intervals provided. Analysis will be done twice: for subgroup 1 and for subgroups 1 and 2 combined.

    Time frame: Outcome based on histology for group 1 or follow-up for group 2 (maximum 12 months after recruitment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of complications during follow up.

    We calculated the follow-up time from the recruitment visit until surgery, spontaneous resolution or death. If none of these events was observed, follow-up time was censored at the time of the last visit. We constructed cumulative incidence curves, considering the competing risk setting (three possible events). We report the estimated cumulative incidence of each event (with 95% confidence intervals) at 3 and 12 months of follow-up.

    Time frame: The occurrence of complications will be reported at two specific time points: at 3 months and 12 months after recruitment.

  2. Examination of natural history

    We will describe ultrasound characteristics (median, IQR and range for continuous variables, frequency and proportion for categorical variables) at every visit (initial visit, 6-8 week visit, 3 month visit, 12 month visit). This will be done overall and separately for three subgroups. * Patients in group 1. It does not matter whether surgery eventually took place or not. * Patients in group 2, and for which the mass has spontaneously resolved at the next visit (this subgroup is not applicable at the 12 month visit). * Patients in group 2 (this subgroup is not applicable at the 12 month visit) Exceptions: decision to operate, but it did not happen; LFU after that visit.

    Time frame: Initial visit, 6-8 week visit, 3-month visit, and 12-month visit.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • UZ Leuven
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06693596
Lead sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 18, 2024
Start date
Nov 20, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 21, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 18, 2024

Study contacts

Dirk Timmerman, Prof.
Contact
iota@uzleuven.be
+3216344202
Wouter Froyman, Prof.
Contact
iota@uzleuven.be
3216344202

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion