An interventional study of Single vision spectacle lens and A.R.R.E.S.T. spectacle film in Myopia and Myopia Progression, sponsored by nthalmic Pty Ltd. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Vietnam. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-20.
Sponsored by nthalmic Pty Ltd · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if spectacle films using Active Reconfiguration in Retinal Encoding of Spatio-Temporal (A.R.R.E.S.T.®) signal technology works to slow down the rate of myopia progression in myopic children. The first stage of the trial compares spectacle films using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology to single vision spectacle lenses in myopic children and the second stage looks at the rate of myopia progression in children while wearing spectacle films using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology. The main questions to answer are: Do spectacle films using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology slow down the rate of axial length growth? Do spectacle films using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology slow down the rate of increase in myopic refractive error? Researchers will compare spectacle films using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology to a single vision spectacle lens for 12 months followed by assessing spectacle films using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology for slowing down myopia progression for another 12 months.
Participants will initially be randomly allocated to wear either spectacle films using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology or single vision spectacle lenses and visit the clinic on seven occasions over a 12 month period. After completing the first 12 months, all participants will wear spectacle films using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology and visit the clinic on five occasions over the second 12 month period.
The aims of this clinical trial are:
Stage 1: Baseline, Dispensing, 1-month, 3-months, 6 months,9-months, and 12-months.
Stage 2: Dispensing, 3-months, 6 months,9-months, and 12-months. All procedures performed at these visits are standard, non-invasive clinical tests.
984 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia; 210 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 123 is above the median of 80 across 783 interventional studies indexed under Myopia.
Browse Myopia studies →nthalmic Pty Ltd is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria
Have:
Have their parent / legal guardian.
Meet the following criteria determined by cycloplegic autorefraction at Baseline:
Current or prior use of interventions intended for myopia control, including but not limited to:
Optical devices:
Pharmacological agents:
Known ocular or systemic disease, such as but not limited to:
Any ocular, systemic, or neuro-developmental conditions that could influence refractive development, such as but not limited to:
Single vision spectacle lens
Device: Single vision spectacle lens
A.R.R.E.S.T.® spectacle films
Device: A.R.R.E.S.T. spectacle film
Standard single vision spectacle lens
A.R.R.E.S.T. spectacle film
Axial Length
Difference in change from Stage 1 dispensing in axial length between test and control. The change in axial length from the Stage 2 dispensing.
Time frame: Stage 1: Dispensing Visit (up to 40 days from Baseline), then 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12- months after Dispensing Visit. Stage 2: Dispensing Visit (up to 40 days from Stage 1: 12-months:), then 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12- months after Dispensing Visit.
Cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction
Difference in change from Baseline in cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction between test and control. The change in cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction from the Stage 1: 12-months visit.
Time frame: Stage 1: Baseline, then 6- and 12- months after Dispensing Visit (up to 40 days from Baseline). Stage 2: Stage 1: 12-months visit, then 6- and 12-months after Stage 2 Dispensing Visit (up to 40 days from Stage 1: 12 months visit).
Visual performance as measured by high contrast visual acuity at 6 m
Difference in high contrast visual acuity at 6 m between test and control. High contrast visual acuity at 6 m while wearing spectacle films using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology.
Time frame: Stage 1: Dispensing Visit (up to 40 days from Baseline), then 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months after Dispensing Visit. Stage 2: Dispensing Visit (up to 40 days from Stage 1: 12-months visit), then 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months after Dispensing Visit.
Visual performance as measured by a non validated questionnaire based on a 1-10 numeric rating scale
Difference in subjective visual performance between test and control. Subjective visual performance while wearing spectacle films using A.R.R.E.S.T.® technology.
Time frame: Stage 1: 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months after Dispensing Visit (up to 40 days from Baseline). Stage 2: 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months after Dispensing Visit (up to 40 days from Stage 2: 12-months Visit).
Plan to share: No — There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
nthalmic Pty Ltd