An interventional study of Trunk control exercises combined with patient education program and Trunk control exercises in Strokes Thrombotic, sponsored by Gulf Medical University. Completed at 1 site in United Arab Emirates. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-08.
Sponsored by Gulf Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The trunk movement awareness and education of individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis is not emphasized adequately in clinical practice. Therefore, this current study was made to hypothesize whether a patient education program about dynamic trunk control exercises during stroke rehabilitation may influence trunk control. 40 individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis were recruited and randomly allocated to the experimental and control group. Both the groups received 1 hour of exercises focusing more on dynamic trunk control exercises with patient education chart (experimental group) and without the patient education chart (control group) for 4 weeks.
The prevalence of stroke in adults increased by 14.6% in 2022 compared to data collected in 2013. Poor balance, postural asymmetry, abnormal gait, and fall-related complications due to reduced trunk control can limit social interactions. Trunk control is an important predictor of functional independence for stroke-affected individuals recovering from functional impairments. Studies have found that individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis have mild-to-severe trunk dysfunction even 6 months post-stroke occurrence. Evidence also indicates that the muscular strength of the trunk is significantly reduced in acute and chronic stages, which leads to poor functional performance. As trunk function significantly contributes to functional recovery, the importance of trunk training needs to be emphasized, and education should be provided to stroke patients for faster functional mobility.
Patient education programs guide patients, caregivers, and family members to understand and promote the patient's participation in continuing care and treatment decisions. This method assists patients in incorporating information, expertise, beliefs, and behaviors related to their health promotion and faster functional recovery from physical and psychological impairments. Patient education provides adequate and appropriate scientific knowledge for patients to improve their awareness of illness conditions and health-promoting practices. Studies also suggest that the patient education process increases patient's involvement in rehabilitation practices.
Although trunk control exercises are performed during routine rehabilitation programs, knowledge and education about trunk training exercises are not specifically emphasized in stroke rehabilitation protocols. Stroke patients need to be educated not only about upper and lower functional training but also should understand trunk control training during their rehabilitation process to acquire skills.
In this proposed study, a patient education program highlighting the significance of trunk control, its role in functional improvement, and patient-centered self-care might provide better functional mobility compared to a standalone trunk control exercises program. Through this program, patients can concentrate not only on limb training but also emphasize trunk-related functional tasks to improve overall body function. Therefore, our current study hypothesized that a patient education program about the trunk training program during the rehabilitation process may improve balance and functional mobility better than a standalone trunk control exercises program in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis.
21 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombotic Stroke; 8 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 85 across 13 interventional studies indexed under Thrombotic Stroke.
Browse Thrombotic Stroke studies →Gulf Medical University is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
This group have received Trunk control exercises along with patient education program.
Device: Trunk control exercises combined with patient education program
This group have received standalone trunk control exercises.
Device: Trunk control exercises
Patients in this group received about 45-60 minutes of trunk control exercises in lying and sitting, 5 days a week for 4 consecutive weeks. Each exercise was performed with 10-20 repetitions per session depending on the patient's ability. Trunk exercises or other activities targeting the trunk while sitting and lying, to minimize the influence of lower extremity function performed either on a stable or unstable surfaces. In addition, the experimental group provided a patient education program which focuses on the importance of trunk control and benefits of trunk control exercises during the rehabilitation process. Further, caregivers and family members were also explained about the patient education program and adherence with treatment protocol during and after the interventions.
Patients in this group received about 45-60 minutes of trunk control exercises in lying and sitting, 5 days a week for 4 consecutive weeks. Each exercise was performed with 10-20 repetitions per session depending on the patient's ability. Trunk exercises or other activities targeting the trunk while sitting and lying, to minimize the influence of lower extremity function performed either on a stable or unstable surfaces.
Trunk impairment scale
The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) is a valid tool for assessing motor impairment of the trunk in stroke patients. In a sitting position, patient's static and dynamic sitting balance, as well as trunk coordination were assessed. For the static subscale, the patient's ability to maintain a sitting position with feet supported and legs crossed. The lateral flexion of the trunk and unilateral hip lifting were assessed to quantify the dynamic sitting balance. To assess the coordination function, the patient was instructed to rotate the upper or lower part of their trunk six times, initiating movements from the shoulder or pelvic girdle. The total score ranges from 0 (minimal performance) to 23 (perfect performance). This scale has high reliability, validity, and predictive value for functional outcomes, making it an effective tool for evaluating trunk function in stroke patients
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment week 4
Functional Mobility
The Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) is a valid tool for assessing functional mobility in stroke patients. It is the 15-item questionnaire, which includes 14 self-reported items and one direct observation task. The items cover a range of mobility activities, from turning in bed to running. For each item, the patient receives a score of 1 if they can perform the task independently, or 0 if they cannot. The assessor allowed the patient to attempt each task unless there is a safety concern. The total score ranges from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating better functional mobility
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment week 4
Berg Balance Scale
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is a valid and reliable tool, consisting of 14-items that evaluates a patient's ability to maintain balance while performing functional tasks. The assessment items range from simple activities like sitting unsupported to more challenging tasks such as standing on one foot. Each item is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale from 0 (unable to perform) to 4 (independent) depending on the patient's achievement level. A score of ≤49/56 indicates a fall risk in stroke patients and change of 4-7 points considered clinically significant improvement
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment week 4
Plan to share: No — The data may be provided based upon request related to research purpose
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Dec 2020 to primary completion in Sep 2021, 9 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Gulf Medical University