ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06679426Updated Nov 7, 2024

Safety and Efficacy of Conestat Alfa for ACE-Induced Angioedema

A Phase 3 interventional study of Conestat Alfa in ACE Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema, sponsored by University of Cincinnati. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-07.

Sponsored by University of Cincinnati · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), prescribed most often to treat hypertension, have been used extensively since the 1980s. Additional indications for their use include heart failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and post-myocardial infarction. It is estimated that up to 40 million patients take ACE-Is worldwide. C1-INH is a serine protease inhibitor that is normally found in the blood. Its primary function is the regulation of the complement and contact system pathways by binding irreversibly to target proteases. It additionally inhibits the fibrinolytic, clotting, and kinin pathways.31 Patients with the hereditary forms of AE (HAE) tend to have lower quantitative or functional levels of C1-INH. This results in decreased suppression of plasma kallikrein and factor XIIa leading to cleavage of high molecular weight kininogen to form increased circulating levels of bradykinin. Bradykinin binds to bradykinin 2 receptors resulting in separation of endothelial vascular cells and extravasation of fluid manifesting clinically as angioedema. Conestat alfa (Ruconest®) is a recombinant human C1-INH that has been purified from the breast milk of genetically modified rabbits. It is a single-chain soluble glycoprotein that is made of 478 amino acids. Administering conestat alfa increases the amount of C1-INH in these patients, repleting their levels, and acting as a treatment for AE due to C1-INH deficiency. Conestat alfa has been studied on asymptomatic patients with HAE and was shown to dose-dependently increase the level of functional C1-INH. Additionally, it was shown to restore the level of the complement C4 protein, which is also decreased in these patients. Since the same pathophysiological pathway is involved in patients with ACE-I-induced AE, it is reasonable to hypothesize its effectiveness in the treatment of patients with acute attacks.

Read the detailed description

This phase III clinical trial is being conducted to assess the benefits of emergency administration of intravenous (IV) conestat alfa to treat ACE-I-induced AE during an ED visit. This will be a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, two-armed, placebo-controlled trial. It will enroll 24 patients at two clinical sites in the United States. The population will consist of adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) who present to the ED with acute ACE-I-induced AE of the head and/or neck. Eligible patients will be enrolled in the study and randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to either the active treatment or placebo groups. The treatment group will receive intravenous conestat alfa at a fixed dose of 4200 International Units (IU) IV along with usual ED care at the discretion of the clinical care team, which may include epinephrine, H1 and/or H2-antihistamines, and corticosteroids. The placebo group will receive the same volume of an isotonic, sterile, normal saline (pH 5.5 ± 0.3) solution without any preservatives via IV injection, in addition to the usual care. Fixed dosing was chosen for this study rather than weight-based dosing as is used for treatment of acute attacks of hereditary angioedema because it is hypothesized that higher doses may have greater efficacy in ACE-I-induced AE and is safe to administer.32 A second fixed dose (4200 IU) of open label study drug will be administered 2 hours after the initial dose as a rescue medication if the subject has not experienced symptom relief (based upon TOSR evaluation). Additional doses of study drug or placebo will not be used. The rationale behind the dosage is based on the fact that 4200 IU is the maximum dose irrespective of patient weight. A second dose of the same amount is recommended if symptoms persist.

The primary objective is to compare the Time to Onset of Symptom Relief (TOSR) of conestat alfa compared to placebo in the treatment of ACE-I-induced AE. The secondary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of conestat alfa compared to placebo in Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria (TMDC), based on investigator-assessment of upper airway symptoms. The study will also compare the proportion of patients in each arm who 1) are hospitalized for any level of care 2) are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 3) requiring airway intervention (e.g., intubation, cricothyrotomy, or tracheotomy). Safety and tolerability of conestat alfa treatment will also be assessed.

02

Conditions studied

  • ACE Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Ruconest, conestat alpha, ACE inhibitor, angioedema, treatment, outcome, safety
03

In context

Angioedema

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Angioedema; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 45 across 44 interventional studies indexed under Angioedema.

Browse Angioedema studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 324 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18 years or older 2. Currently being treated with an ACE-I and presenting with presumed ACE-I-induced AE involving the head and/or neck region as determined by the clinical team 3. ACE-I-induced AE of the head and/or neck region of at least moderate severity within 24 hours of onset (must be sufficiently less than 24 hours to allow study drug to be administered within the same time frame) 4. AE that is at least moderate in severity for no less than one of the AE-associated airway symptoms (difficulty breathing, difficulty swallowing, voice changes, tongue swelling)32 5. Be able to provide or obtain informed consent from a legally appointed representative

Exclusion criteria

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of anaphylaxis, , or allergic reactions to rabbits/rabbit-derived products and C1-INH preparations 2. Urticaria present during the current illness 3. AE thought by the clinical team to be due to any other etiology i.e., HAE (types I, II, and HAE with normal C1-INH), acquired AE, allergic/histaminergic AE 4. History of recent trauma, abscess, infection, local inflammation, local tumor, postoperative or post-radiogenic edema, salivary gland disorders, and non-ACE-I drug-induced AE 5. Family history of recurrent AE 6. History of AE prior to ACE-I therapy initiation 7. Last dose of ACE-I taken more than 72 hours before the onset of AE symptoms 8. History of a major systemic disease that is not well controlled (left to the study team's discretion) 9. Anyone requiring immediate airway intervention according to the clinical team, such as endotracheal intubation 10. Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding (pregnancy must be ruled out by a negative test with the exception of those who have undergone total hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or are 2 years ) 11. Concurrent participation in other drug studies 12. Treatment with other targeted therapeutic agents for HAE (ecallantide/icatibant/C1-INH/fresh frozen plasma) 13. In the opinion of the investigator, there is adequate response to the usual care treatments (epinephrine, H1 and/or H2 antihistamine, ) within one hour before dosing of the study drug 14. Prisoners 15. Non-English speaking

-

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Investigational product

    Human recombinant C1-INH, also known as conestat alfa (Ruconest™), has been purified from the breast milk of genetically modified rabbits. Conestat alfa targets activated C1s, kallikrein, factor XIIa, and factor XIa. Inhibition kinetics are comparable to plasma-derived human C1-INH. The elimination half-life is approximately 2.5 hours.37 One vial consists of 2100 units, which corresponds to 2100 units per 14 mL after reconstitution, resulting in a concentration of 150 units/mL. One unit of activity corresponds to C1 esterase inhibiting activity in 1 mL of normal plasma. Each vial also contains 19.5 mg of sodium.41 In order to administer 4200 IU of conestat alfa, 2 reconstituted vials are needed

    Drug: Conestat Alfa

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    The comparator in the study will be a placebo, an isotonic sterile solution (pH 5.5 ± 0.3) for IV injection. The solution does not contain any preservatives. The placebo is formulated to match the study drug (conestat alfa) and is supplied in an identical single-dose IV bag. To maintain the blinding of the study, the IV bag containing the placebo will be indistinguishable from that containing conestat alfa, in addition to the labeling

    Drug: Conestat Alfa

Interventions

  • See arm/group descriptions

    Also known as: Ruconest

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of conestat alfa compared to placebo in the treatment of ACE-1-induced AE based on the Time to Onset of Symptom Relief (TOSR) endpoint.

    The TOSR is defined as the time at which the total severity score of four airway compromising symptoms (difficulty breathing, difficulty swallowing, voice changes, and tongue swelling) has decreased by at least 1 point overall and no individual component of the score has increased. The 5-point severity scale is: 0 = absence of symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. The secondary objective is to compare the efficacy of conestat alfa to placebo for the treatment of ACE-1-induced AE based on the endpoint of Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria (TMDC).

    The criteria for discharge will be based on the assessment of the severity of four airway compromising symptoms, and will be calculated from the time of initiation of study drug administration to the earliest point at which the symptoms of difficulty breathing and difficulty swallowing have resolved (score = 0) and the symptoms of voice change and tongue swelling are mild or absent.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory objective

    Exploratory objectives include comparison of the proportion of patients in each arm who 1) are hospitalized to any level of care 2) are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 3) required an airway intervention (e.g., intubation, cricothyrotomy, or tracheotomy).

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Safety outcome

    Safety and tolerability of conestat alfa treatment in patients experiencing ACE-I-induced AE will be assessed.

    Time frame: Every hour post treatment up to 8 hours and then every 2 hours from >8 to 24 hours; phone calls at day 7 and day 28.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bernstein JA, Moellman JJ, Collins SP, Hart KW, Lindsell CJ. Effectiveness of ecallantide in treating angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema in the emergency department. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Mar;114(3):245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 16. PubMed 25601538 ↗
  • Moellman JJ, Bernstein JA, Lindsell C, Banerji A, Busse PJ, Camargo CA Jr, Collins SP, Craig TJ, Lumry WR, Nowak R, Pines JM, Raja AS, Riedl M, Ward MJ, Zuraw BL, Diercks D, Hiestand B, Campbell RL, Schneider S, Sinert R; American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM). A consensus parameter for the evaluation and management of angioedema in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;21(4):469-84. doi: 10.1111/acem.12341. PubMed 24730413 ↗
  • Bonner N, Panter C, Kimura A, Sinert R, Moellman J, Bernstein JA. Development and validation of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) induced angioedema investigator rating scale and proposed discharge criteria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 22;17(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2274-4. PubMed 28532495 ↗
  • Sinert R, Levy P, Bernstein JA, Body R, Sivilotti MLA, Moellman J, Schranz J, Baptista J, Kimura A, Nothaft W; CAMEO study group. Randomized Trial of Icatibant for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Upper Airway Angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1402-1409.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 May 25. PubMed 28552382 ↗
  • Mudd PA, Hooker EA, Stolz U, Hart KW, Bernstein JA, Moellman JJ. Emergency department evaluation of patients with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor associated angioedema. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;38(12):2596-2601. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.12.058. Epub 2020 Jan 7. PubMed 31932133 ↗
  • Wilkerson RG, Dakessian A, Moellman JJ, Bernstein JA. Clinical trial of C1-INH for treatment of ACEi-induced angioedema. Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;68:196-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Apr 11. No abstract available. PubMed 37061431 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be published. Raw data will be provided upon request as appropriate.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Study will enrol over 12 months and data analysis and publication 0ver 6 to 12 months. Data will be available after publication of the study

Access criteria: Contact the Protocol Chair Jonathan Bernstein or Co-PIs Drs. Joseph Moellman or Gentry Wilderson

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2024; primary completion for Dec 2025, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 5, 2024
First posted
Nov 7, 2024
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 2025
Last update
Nov 7, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06679426
Collaborators
University of Maryland
Responsible party
Jonathan Bernstein (Adjunct Professor, University of Cincinnati) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 7, 2024
Start date
Dec 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 7, 2024

Study contacts

Jonathan A. Bernstein, MD
Contact
bernstja@ucmail.uc.edu
5132357971
Joseph A. Moellman, MD
principal investigator · University of Cincinnati
Gentry Wilkerson, MD
principal investigator · University of Maryland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Conestat alfa

Start the discussion