ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06678984Updated Oct 6, 2026

Treated Umbilical Vein Allograft (UVT) Versus Autologous Fascial Pubovaginal Sling in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

A Phase 3 interventional study of with treated umbilical vein allograft and with autologous fascial pubovaginal sling in Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women, sponsored by TBF Genie Tissulaire. Recruiting at 8 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-06.

Sponsored by TBF Genie Tissulaire · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Updated Oct 6, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether a treated umbilical vein allograft is effective in treating stress urinary incontinence in females. The researchers will compare the treated umbilical vein allograft with a sling made of autologous tissue. The main question the clinical trial aims to answer is:

- Is the treated umbilical vein allograft as effective as the sling made of autologous tissue for treating female stress urinary incontinence?

Participants will:

  • Undergo surgical treatment with either the umbilical vein allograft or the sling made of autologous tissue on Day 0.
  • Visit the hospital for a series of tests at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the surgical intervention.
  • Record their bladder activity between each hospital visit.
Read the detailed description

It is estimated that more than 9 million French people are affected by urinary incontinence, of which 1% are treated surgically. When medical management or rehabilitation fails, surgical treatment must be considered. Sling implantation is a commonly used surgical technique for treating stress urinary incontinence, as it reduces surgery time and morbidity, and can be performed under local anesthesia. However, the risk of complications associated with the use of synthetic materials is significant, contributing to a recent decline in the popularity of synthetic slings.

Given the high demand for incontinence treatments, autologous fascia sling surgeries are being proposed, despite requiring an additional surgical procedure and exposing patients to complications at the donor site of the graft.

The study product aims to address the need for a safer, equally effective implant that eliminates the need for autografting while maintaining standard surgical techniques.

The aim of this comparative study is to determine whether the efficacy of the treated umbilical vein allograft can justify its use as a substitute for the autologous fascial sling, thereby avoiding the complications associated with harvesting the autograft.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women

Browse trials for

03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

983 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 180 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 96 is above the median of 66 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

TBF Genie Tissulaire is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18 to 85 years.
  • Patients with stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence with a predominant stress component.
  • Patients with stress urinary incontinence due to cervico-urethral hypermobility or urethral hypermobility.
  • Patients with urethral hypermobility confirmed by Ulmsten suburethral support maneuver.
  • Urinary incontinence demonstrated by one-hour pad test.
  • Patients with significant and persistent discomfort despite perineal rehabilitation.
  • Patients able to understand the information concerning the study and having voluntarily dated and signed the form.
  • Patients able and willing to comply with the requirements and instructions of the study.
  • Patients who are members or the beneficiary of a national health insurance plan.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women or those not using effective .
  • Patients with a (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2.
  • Patients with moderate stress urinary incontinence treated with physiotherapy and pelvic support exercises.
  • Patients with voiding disorders or at risk of performing self-catheterization.
  • Patients who have already undergone surgical treatment for urinary incontinence.
  • Patients unable to perform the pad test or unwilling to perform it at each follow-up visit.
  • Patients considered by the principal investigator to be poor candidates for surgical procedures and/or anesthesia due to their physical or mental state.
  • Patients with current urinary tract infection, severe anemia, uncontrolled diabetes or other conditions contraindicating surgery.
  • Patients with neurogenic bladder.
  • Patients with a history of conditions, illnesses or surgical procedures that may confound the results of the urinary incontinence assessment, including but not limited to: pelvic organ prolapse (e.g., cystocele, rectocele), neurological disorders (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease), recurrent urinary tract infections, recurrent bladder stones, interstitial cystitis, history of pelvic irradiation (external beam therapy or brachytherapy), current diagnosis of genitourinary .
  • Patients deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision.
  • Patients incapable of discernment for rehabilitation, unable to follow up or give consent.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
96 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treated umbilical vein allograft

    Procedure: with treated umbilical vein allograft

  • Active comparator
    Autologous Fascial Pubovaginal Sling

    Procedure: with autologous fascial pubovaginal sling

Interventions

  • Procedurewith treated umbilical vein allograft

    Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence using a treated allogeneic umbilical vein sling

  • Procedurewith autologous fascial pubovaginal sling

    Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence using a autologous fascial pubovaginal sling

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference between treatment groups in change from baseline to final 12-month postoperative visits in the amount of urinary leakage.

    The amount of urinary leakage (grams) will be quantified by a one-hour pad test performed during patient visit at the hospital. One-hour pad test will be performed in the following way: * Subject puts on one standardized, pre-weighed pad without voiding. * 0-15 Minutes: Subject drinks 500 mL of sodium-free liquid in \< 15 min while sitting or resting. * 15 - 45 Minutes: Subject walks for 30 minutes, including climbing one flight of stairs (up and down). * 45 - 60 Minutes: Subject performs the following activities: Standing up from sitting (10 times), Coughing vigorously (10 times), Running on the spot (1 min), Bending to pick up an object from the floor (5 times), Wash hands in running water (1 min). * The weight of the pad is measured to determine the amount of leakage.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference between treatment groups in change from baseline to 3- and 6-month postoperative visits in the amount of urinary leakage.

    The amount of urinary leakage (grams) will be quantified by a one-hour pad test performed during patient visits at the hospital.

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

  2. Difference between treatment groups in the proportion of subjects who achieved a reduction of more than 50% in the amount of urinary leakage between baseline and the 12-month visit.

    The amount of urinary leakage (grams) will be quantified by a one-hour pad test performed during patient visit at the hospital.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Difference between treatment groups in change from baseline to final 12-month postoperative visits in the number of incontinence episodes and pads used daily.

    The number of incontinence episodes and pads used daily will be determined from a voiding calendar carried out by the patient at home over a 3-day period.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Difference between treatment groups in changes between initial and postoperative visits in frequency, severity and impact on quality of life of patients' urinary incontinence, as measured by the ICIQ-UI-SF.

    The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) assess frequency, severity and impact on quality of life (QoL) of patients' urinary incontinence symptoms. The result of the ICIQ-UI SF is a composite score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe incontinence.

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  5. Difference between treatment groups in changes between initial and postoperative visits in the distress caused by urinary incontinence symptoms, as measured by the UDI-6.

    The Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) assess the distress caused by urinary incontinence symptoms. The UDI-6 total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more distressing symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  6. Difference between treatment groups in changes between initial and postoperative visits in the psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in patients, as measured by the IIQ-7.

    The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) assess the psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in female patients. The IIQ-7 total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a greater psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence on the patient.

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  7. Difference between treatment groups in changes between initial and postoperative visits in the patients' perceived symptom improvement, as measured by the PGI-I

    Patients' perceived improvement in urinary incontinence symptoms will be assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). PGI-I measures improvement on a scale of 1 "very much better" to 7 "very much worse."

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  8. Difference between treatment groups in rates of specific complications

    Rate of specific complications, including skin reaction, delayed healing, urinary retention, injury to the bladder or other abdominal structures, severe and persistent pain will be evaluated during each patient's post-operative visits to the hospital.

    Time frame: 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

07

Study locations

8 of 8 sites recruiting
  • Hôpital Estaing, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63100, France
    Recruiting
    • Sandrine Campagne-Loiseau, MD · Principal investigator
  • Hôpital Michalon, CHU de Grenoble Alpes
    La Tronche, 38700, France
    Recruiting
    • Caroline THUILLIER, MD · Principal investigator
  • Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes
    Nantes, 44000, France
    Recruiting
    • Marie-Aimée PERROUIN-VERBE, Professor · Principal investigator
    • Marie-Liesse DE GUERRY DE BEAUREGARD, MD · Sub investigator
  • Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris
    Paris, 75013, France
    Recruiting
    • Kamilia ZEDEK · Contactkamilia.zedek@aphp.fr · 184828323
    • Emmanuel CHARTIER-KASTLER, Professor · Principal investigator
  • Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon
    Pierre-Bénite, 69495, France
    Recruiting
    • Alain RUFFION, Professor · Principal investigator
    • Théo ARBER, MD · Sub investigator
  • Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, CHU de Rouen
    Rouen, 76000, France
    Recruiting
    • Jean-Nicolas CORNU, Professor · Principal investigator
  • Nouvel hôpital civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, 67091, France
    Recruiting
    • Christian SAUSSINE, Professor · Principal investigator
    • Baptiste POUSSOT, MD · Sub investigator
  • Hôpital Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse
    Toulouse, 31400, France
    Recruiting
    • Xavier GAME, Professor · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2028, 29 months after the start.

Of 30 phase 3 interventional studies under Urinary Incontinence, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 29 months is above that.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Oct 2025 → Nov 2025, on Oct 6, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 5, 2024
First posted
Nov 7, 2024
StartActual
Nov 6, 2025was Oct 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2028
Last update
Oct 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 6, 2026
Sites
8 sites changed recruiting status (8 now recruiting)
Show 8 sites
  • Hôpital Estaing, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand · Clermont-Ferrand, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • Hôpital Michalon, CHU de Grenoble Alpes · La Tronche, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes · Nantes, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris · Paris, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon · Pierre-Bénite, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, CHU de Rouen · Rouen, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • Nouvel hôpital civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · Strasbourg, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • Hôpital Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse · Toulouse, Franceno status→Recruiting
Oct 6, 2026
Start date
Oct 2025→Nov 6, 2025 (actual)
Oct 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 6, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    8 sites changed recruiting status (8 now recruiting)
    Show 8 sites
    • Hôpital Estaing, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand · Clermont-Ferrand, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • Hôpital Michalon, CHU de Grenoble Alpes · La Tronche, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes · Nantes, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris · Paris, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon · Pierre-Bénite, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, CHU de Rouen · Rouen, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • Nouvel hôpital civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · Strasbourg, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • Hôpital Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse · Toulouse, Franceno status→Recruiting
    Start date Oct 2025→Nov 6, 2025 (now actual)
    + 2 other changes: verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06678984
Lead sponsor
TBF Genie Tissulaire
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 7, 2024
Start date
Nov 6, 2025
Primary completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2026

Study contacts

Laurence BARNOUIN, MD
Contact
laurence.barnouin@tbf-lab.com
+33472686909
Justine BOSC, MSc
Contact
justine.bosc@tbf-lab.com
+33472686911

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion