CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06663553Updated Sep 18, 2025

Comparing the Efficacy of TU-LESS and vNOTES for Hysterectomy of Enlarged Uterus

An interventional study of TU-LESS and vNOTES in Enlarged Uterus, Adenomyosis and Uterine Fibroids (UF), sponsored by West China Second University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-18.

Sponsored by West China Second University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
210
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Enlarged uterus is frequently encountered in clinical practice, and its incidence due to conditions such as adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, and other gynecological disorders has steadily increased over the years statistically. For example, greater healthcare awareness has led to more frequent early diagnoses of these conditions, contributing to the observed rise in incidence. Additionally, increasing life expectancy results in more women reaching the perimenopausal and postmenopausal stages, during which conditions like uterine fibroids and adenomyosis become more prevalent. For these women, hysterectomy (removal of the entire uterus) is often the recommended option of treatment.

With advances in surgical techniques over recent decades, there has been a notable shift from traditional open abdominal surgeries to minimally invasive approaches. Laparoscopic surgery has been widely adopted, significantly reducing the size and number of incisions required, thereby promoting faster recovery, minimizing postoperative pain, and reducing the risk of complications.

However, conventional multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy still presents certain challenges, such as large uterus extraction following resection, and concerns about healing of incisions. In contrast, innovative techniques like Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery(TU-LESS) and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery(vNOTES) both take advantage of natural anatomical openings to achieve minimal or no visible scarring. Studies demonstrate that these techniques provide superior outcomes in terms of reduced pain, faster recovery, and quicker return to daily activities compared to traditional multi-port laparoscopic approaches.

Yet a direct comparison of the efficacy of these two methods in real-world, particularly for enlarged uterus, remains inconclusive. Thus this study aims to evaluate and compare the outcomes of these two techniques in patients with enlarged uteri. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two surgical approaches, ensuring an unbiased comparison of the efficacy of the procedures in terms of healing status and recovery time.

Read the detailed description

Enlarged uterus, mainly caused by adenomyosis, is often associated with symptoms like compression of intestines and urethra(presenting as constipation, urinary frequency, and urgency), dysmenorrhea, menstrual irregularity, and anemia due to menorrhagia. A hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) is often recommended, especially in cases where conservative management like medical treatment fails.

Among all the methods of hysterectomy, TU-LESS and vNOTES are noted for minimized invasiveness and fast recovery. As vNOTES is performed through the vagina and TU-LESS involves a single incision through the umbilicus, they both utilize natural anatomical openings, resulting in minimal to no visible scarring.

02

Conditions studied

  • Enlarged Uterus
  • Adenomyosis
  • Uterine Fibroids (UF)
03

In context

Adenomyosis

135 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenomyosis; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 210 is above the median of 100 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Adenomyosis.

Browse Adenomyosis studies →

Lead sponsor

West China Second University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligible women aged 18-70 years.
  • Women with indications for enlarged uterine volumes who are planning to under go total hysterectomy. Uterine size should exceed that of a 3-month pregnancy (uterine weight ≥ 280 g).
  • Patients are willing to be randomly assigned to undergo any of both approaches.
  • Patients who are willing to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are virgins or have vaginal stenosis.
  • Patients requiring concurrent surgical intervention for conditions such as ovarian cysts or lesions of the vulva, vagina, appendix, etc.
  • presence of uterus exceeding approximately 20 gestational weeks in size (about 900-1000g), which is beyond the limitations of a single-site laparoscopic approach due to concerns regarding technical feasibility and safety
  • Presence of malignancy or strong suspicion of malignancy that may alter the planned surgical approach.
  • History of two or more pelvic surgeries or suspected severe pelvic adhesions (rectovaginal examination suggesting rectovaginal endometriosis or limited uterine mobility).
  • History of peritoneal dialysis, pelvic radiation therapy and pelvic tuberculosis treated with laparoscopic surgery.
  • Patients with prolapse or pelvic inflammation.
  • Diabetes mellitus with poor blood glucose control.
  • Body mass index greater than 30 kg/m².
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    TU-LESS for hysterectomy

    Patients diagnosed with enlarged uteri following a bimanual examination, with confirmation of the size and nature of the enlargement through imaging techniques such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

    Procedure: TU-LESS

  • Experimental
    vNOTES for hysterectomy

    Patients diagnosed with enlarged uteri following a bimanual examination, with confirmation of the size and nature of the enlargement through imaging techniques such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

    Procedure: vNOTES

Interventions

  • ProcedureTU-LESS

    patients in TU-LESS group will receive transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) for hysterectomy

  • ProcedurevNOTES

    patients in vNOTES group will receive transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (TU-LESS) for hysterectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative liquid diet

    the proportion of patients able to consume a liquid diet post-surgery

    Time frame: within 24 hours postoperatively

  2. passing flatus

    the proportion of patients able to pass flatus

    Time frame: within 24 hours postoperatively

  3. self-urination after catheter removal

    The proportion of patients regaining the ability to urinate without assistance after catheter removal

    Time frame: within 24 hours postoperatively

  4. ambulation

    The proportion of patients regaining mobility after catheter removal

    Time frame: within 24 hours postoperatively

  5. hospital stay

    The percentage of patients discharged within 2 days after surgery

    Time frame: within 2 days postoperatively

  6. examination of pelvic fuction

    The assessment of pelvic floor function involves evaluating Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI), Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) and Sexual Dysfunction. The PISQ-IR (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire) is a validated tool specifically designed to evaluate sexual function in the context of pelvic floor. It is a tool that measures sexual function specifically for women affected by pelvic floor disorders, such as urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

    Time frame: within 2 days postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain

    It is measured by the VAS score. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be').

    Time frame: at 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively

  2. The duration of operation

    It will be measured in min utes, starting from the initiation of the skin (or vag inal) incision and concluding upon the completion of the skin (or vaginal) suturing. If a frozen biopsy is needed during the operation, the increased time for the frozen biopsy should be subtracted. However, pa tients for whom the surgical method is changed due to the result of the frozen biopsy should be excluded.

    Time frame: during operation

  3. amount of bleeding

    Time frame: during operation

  4. Intraoperative complications and postoperative complications

    We use the Clavien-Dindo classification to rank a complication in an objective and reproducible manner. It consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). The introduction of the subclasses a and b allows a contraction of the classification into 5 grades (I, II, III, IV and V) depending on the size of the population observed or the of the focus of a study.

    Time frame: within 3 months

  5. abdominal scars assessment

    The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) will be used. It consists of two separate scales: the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale and measures scar quality (i.e. how the scar looks and feels) from both perspectives. The observer scores six items: vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, surface roughness, pliability, and surface area. The patient scores six items: pain, pruritus, color, thickness, relief, and pliability. All included items are scored on the same polytomous 10-point scale, in which a score of 1 is given when the scar characteristic is akin to 'normal skin' and a score of 10 reflects the 'worst imaginable scar'. All items are summed to give a total scar score, and therefore, a higher score represents a poorer scar quality.

    Time frame: both at 3 and 6 months after surgery

  6. the total dosage of analgesics taken

    also categorized by analgesic type

    Time frame: during the first 24 hours following surgery

  7. The Female Sexual Function Index(FSFI)

    Using either a paper sheet or online questionnaire

    Time frame: both at baseline and 6 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • West China Second University Hospital
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT, Ricci L, Bedocchi L, Galanti B, Vadora E. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1561-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127596. PubMed 12501064 ↗
  • Zhang W, Deng L, Yang F, Liu J, Chen S, You X, Gou J, Zi D, Li Y, Qi X, Wang Y, Zheng Y. Comparing the efficacy and safety of three surgical approaches for total hysterectomy (TSATH): protocol for a multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):e074478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074478. PubMed 38199630 ↗
  • Chen X, Zhang M, Gao M, Wu Y, He Y, Liu J, Cui H, Jin H. Protocol for a study comparing the efficacy of hysterectomy in patients with enlarged uterus via TU-LESS and vNOTES: a single-blind, prospective randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Nov 26;15(11):e103174. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103174. PubMed 41298256 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06663553
Lead sponsor
West China Second University Hospital
Responsible party
Hongyu Jin (lecturer and gynecological surgeon, West China Second University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 29, 2024
Start date
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion