CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06656078Updated Jan 13, 2025

Comparison of Effect of Different Methods of Cognitive Loading on Gait of Normal Healthy Students

An interventional study of 1. WORKING MEMORY TASK: and 2. VISUAL AND VERBAL FLUENCY TASK in Cognitive Load, Performance, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 17 Years to 20 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-13.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
17 Years to 20 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Comparison of effect of different methods of cognitive loading on gait of normal healthy students.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Load, Performance
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years to 20 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female students from colleges of Abbottabad.
  • Age limit (17 to 20) According to (FSC admission criteria age of the student should not be more than 18 to enter the college.)
  • Healthy individuals without any neurological and MSK disorder. (screening will be done before performing the test on the student, questions regarding the above-mentioned conditions and consent will be signed before starting the test)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any student with visible physical deformity or MSK disorder will not be included in this research (15)
  • Any student with a psychiatric or neurological disorder will not be included (16)
  • Any student with cardiac abnormality will be excluded from this research (17)
  • Any student who does not fall in this age group will not be included in this research.
  • Colleges outside Abbottabad will not be included in this research.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
82 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1 male

    All members of group number 1 who fall in the eligibility criteria will undergo three different types of cognitive loading. Three types of cognitive loading will be applied randomly to eliminate any bias. Each Method will be applied three times with pre and post-recordings to ensure reliability.

    Other: 1. WORKING MEMORY TASK: · Other: 2. VISUAL AND VERBAL FLUENCY TASK · Other: 3. MOTOR TASK:

  • Experimental
    Group 2 female

    All members of group number 2 who fall in the eligibility criteria will undergo three different types of cognitive loading. Three types of cognitive loading will be applied randomly to eliminate any bias. Each Method will be applied three times along with pre and post-recordings to ensure reliability.

    Other: 1. WORKING MEMORY TASK: · Other: 2. VISUAL AND VERBAL FLUENCY TASK · Other: 3. MOTOR TASK:

Interventions

  • Other1. WORKING MEMORY TASK:

    Arithmetic task: backward counting with serial 3 subtractions out loud. Group 1 and Group 2 participants will be asked to count backwards with serial 3 subtractions out loud while walking 10 meters. There is considerable disruption of performance because of simultaneous articulatory suppression. However, when errors were observed they were calculated to be numerically close to the correct figure which suggests that performance was not completely disrupted by suppression of articulation.

  • Other2. VISUAL AND VERBAL FLUENCY TASK

    Modified Stroop test or Stroop colour word test: Participants are asked to name the colour of ink that each word is printed. It is the most frequent test used to show attention bias in anxiety patients. This test will appear on the mobile phone in their hands while they walk to increase the effect of cognitive loading.

  • Other3. MOTOR TASK:

    Carrying a tray with four glasses filled with water. Participants will be asked to hold a tray of glasses filled with water and walk 10 meters to calculate the effect of cognitive loading on gait.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Walking speed (m/s)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures the walking speed with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.93). Walking speed usually decreases if the participant performs a task that challenges dynamic balance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Walking speed (m/s)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures the walking speed with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.93). Walking speed usually decreases if the participant performs a task that challenges dynamic balance.

    Time frame: During Cognitive loading tests

  3. Walking speed (m/s)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures the walking speed with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.93). Walking speed usually decreases if the participant performs a task that challenges dynamic balance.

    Time frame: Immediately after Cognitive loading tests

  4. Gait symmetry (%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures gait symmetry with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.65) Gait symmetry tends to decrease if the participant undergoes a task that includes dynamic balance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Gait symmetry (%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures gait symmetry with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.65) Gait symmetry tends to decrease if the participant undergoes a task that includes dynamic balance.

    Time frame: During Cognitive loading tests

  6. Gait symmetry (%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures gait symmetry with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.65) Gait symmetry tends to decrease if the participant undergoes a task that includes dynamic balance.

    Time frame: Immediately after Cognitive loading tests

  7. Step length(m)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step length with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.94). Step length usually increases with challenged dynamic balance-based activities.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Step length(m)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step length with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.94). Step length usually increases with challenged dynamic balance-based activities.

    Time frame: During Cognitive loading tests

  9. Step length(m)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step length with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.94). Step length usually increases with challenged dynamic balance-based activities.

    Time frame: Immediately after Cognitive loading tests

  10. Step time(s)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step time with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.84). Step time increases under the effect of dynamic balance-based activities.

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Step time(s)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step time with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.84). Step time increases under the effect of dynamic balance-based activities.

    Time frame: During Cognitive loading tests

  12. Step time(s)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step time with moderate to excellent reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.84). Step time increases under the effect of dynamic balance-based activities.

    Time frame: Immediately after Cognitive loading tests

  13. Step time variability(%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step time with moderate to poor reliability while the participant is walking normally (ICC=0.51). Step time variability tends to increase if a participant undergoes dynamic balance-based activities.

    Time frame: Baseline

  14. Step time variability(%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step time with moderate to poor reliability while the participant is walking normally (ICC=0.51). Step time variability tends to increase if a participant undergoes dynamic balance-based activities.

    Time frame: During Cognitive loading tests

  15. Step time variability(%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step time with moderate to poor reliability while the participant is walking normally (ICC=0.51). Step time variability tends to increase if a participant undergoes dynamic balance-based activities.

    Time frame: Immediately after Cognitive loading tests

  16. Step length variability(%)

    For gait activity, the G\&B app measures step length variability with moderate to poor reliability while the participant is walking normally (ICC=0.16). step length variability tends to increase with activities that involve dynamic balance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  17. Step length asymmetry(%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step length asymmetry with moderate to poor reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.6). Step length asymmetry tends to increase with tasks that include dynamic balance.

    Time frame: During Cognitive loading tests

  18. Step length asymmetry(%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step length asymmetry with moderate to poor reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.6). Step length asymmetry tends to increase with tasks that include dynamic balance.

    Time frame: Immediately after Cognitive loading tests

  19. Step time asymmetry(%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step time asymmetry with moderate reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.68). Step time asymmetry tends to increase with activities that include dynamic balance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  20. Step time asymmetry(%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step time asymmetry with moderate reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.68). Step time asymmetry tends to increase with activities that include dynamic balance.

    Time frame: During Cognitive loading tests

  21. Step time asymmetry(%)

    For gait activity, the Gait and Balance mobile app (G\&B) measures step time asymmetry with moderate reliability while the participant is walking normally with (ICC=0.68). Step time asymmetry tends to increase with activities that include dynamic balance.

    Time frame: Immediately after Cognitive loading tests

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Riphah international university
    Islamabad, Punjab 44030, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06656078
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 24, 2024
Start date
Oct 24, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024
Completion
Dec 30, 2024
Last update
Jan 13, 2025

Study contacts

Imran Amjad, PhD
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion