CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06651268Updated Oct 28, 2024

Effectiveness of Topical Vancomycin in Reducing Sternal Wound Infections Post-Cardiac Surgery

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of while Group B (vancomycin group, n=12) had vancomycin powder applied during closure. T in Wound Complication and Cardiac Surgery, sponsored by Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-28.

Sponsored by Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Title: The Role of Vancomycin Powder in Reducing Sternal Wound Infections Following Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction:

Sternal wound infections (SWIs) are significant complications in cardiac surgery, leading to serious issues like mediastinitis, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. This study explores the potential of topical vancomycin powder to reduce SWIs when added to the standard use of systemic antibiotics.

Objectives:

To assess the effectiveness of vancomycin powder in preventing SWIs post-cardiac surgery.

To determine its impact on postoperative hospital stays.

Study Design and Methodology:

A randomized controlled trial will be conducted at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, with 24 patients (12 in each group).

Group A will receive standard wound closure, while Group B will receive vancomycin powder applied to the sternal wound.

Postoperative wound assessments will be conducted at 48 hours, 7 days, and 1 month.

Ethical Considerations:

Ethical approval will be obtained, and informed consent will be sought from all participants

Read the detailed description

The sternotomy approach is widely used in cardiac surgeries, making sternal wound infections a significant concern. These infections can lead to serious complications, including sepsis, reoperation, and increased healthcare costs. Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis is a common practice, but local antibiotic application at the surgical site could further reduce the risk of infection. Vancomycin, due to its effectiveness against gram-positive bacteria, is an ideal candidate for local application. Previous studies in orthopedic surgeries have demonstrated reduced infection rates with vancomycin powder, but its efficacy in cardiac surgery has not been thoroughly explored. This study aims to investigate whether local application of vancomycin powder reduces the incidence of sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery compared to standard care. Additionally, it will evaluate secondary outcomes such as hospital stay duration, postoperative morbidity, and wound-related complications, including dehiscence and the need for reoperation.

The study will be a randomized controlled trial conducted at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. A total of 24 patients undergoing cardiac surgery will be randomly allocated to either a control group (standard closure technique) or an intervention group (1 gram of vancomycin powder applied locally before sternal closure). Both groups will receive systemic antibiotic prophylaxis as part of routine care.

This study aims to provide evidence on the efficacy of local vancomycin powder application in reducing sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery. If successful, it could offer a simple, cost-effective intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgery patients. Further research may be needed to validate the findings and support its widespread implementation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Wound Complication
  • Cardiac Surgery
03

In context

Wound Infection

382 studies on the registry are indexed under Wound Infection; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 150 across 296 interventional studies indexed under Wound Infection.

Browse Wound Infection studies →

Lead sponsor

Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • .Patients aged between 21 and 80 years were included in the study.
  • Both male and female participants were eligible.
  • Patients undergoing various adult cardiac surgical procedures, including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), atrial septal defect (ASD) repair, ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair, and valve replacement, were considered for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who did not provide informed consent were excluded from the study.
  • Individuals with a known sensitivity to vancomycin were not eligible.
  • Pediatric patients were excluded.
  • Patients undergoing redo surgeries were also excluded from participation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    while Group B (vancomycin group, n=12) had vancomycin powder applied during closure. T

    Drug: while Group B (vancomycin group, n=12) had vancomycin powder applied during closure. T

  • Other
    : Group A (control, n=12) received standard closure techniques without vancomycin powder

    Group A (control, n=12) received standard closure techniques without vancomycin powder

    Drug: while Group B (vancomycin group, n=12) had vancomycin powder applied during closure. T

Interventions

  • Drugwhile Group B (vancomycin group, n=12) had vancomycin powder applied during closure. T

    while Group B (vancomycin group, n=12) had vancomycin powder applied during closure. T

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of sternal wound infections (SWIs) following cardiac surgery

    Incidence of sternal wound infections (SWIs) following cardiac surgery in patients who receive vancomycin powder application compared to those who do not. The infections would be diagnosed based on clinical signs such as redness, pain, swelling, and purulent discharge at the wound site.

    Time frame: he patients will be evaluated at three key time points: 48 hours post-surgery 7 days post-surgery 1 month post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cardiac Surgery
    Karachi, Sindh 74201, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Due to privacy issue

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06651268
Lead sponsor
Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College
Responsible party
Qaiser Aziz (Head of Cardiac Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2024
Start date
Nov 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2024

Study contacts

Qaiser Aziz qaiserazizdr@hotmail.com, FCPS
Contact
qaiserazizdr@hotmail.com
+923362405480

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion