ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06642090EDU-HDUpdated Feb 12, 2025

Educational Program for Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

An interventional study of Educational intervention for patients undergoing hemodialysis in Morocco in Hemodialysis, Self-care and End Stage Renal Disease, sponsored by Cadi Ayyad University. Completed at 1 site in Morocco. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-12.

Sponsored by Cadi Ayyad University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on improving knowledge, self-care practices, and treatment adherence among hemodialysis patients at the Youssoufia Hemodialysis Center, located in the Marrakech-Safi region.

Participants will be divided into two groups: an intervention group and a control group. Only the intervention group will receive in-depth training on end-stage renal disease (ESRD), available treatments, potential complications, as well as dietary recommendations and self-care practices tailored for managing arteriovenous fistulas (AVF). The study will assess changes in patients' knowledge, their self-care practices, as well as specific measures such as dry weight, interdialytic weight, and biological markers (calcium, phosphate, and PTH levels).

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the impact of an educational intervention on improving knowledge, self-care practices, and treatment adherence among hemodialysis patients at the Youssoufia Hemodialysis Center, located in the Marrakech-Safi region.

Methodology: Participants will be recruited from adult patients on hemodialysis for more than three months. They will be randomized into two groups: an intervention group, which will receive educational training, and a control group, which will receive usual care without educational intervention. Sociodemographic and clinical criteria will be collected through the examination of patient medical records.

Intervention: The educational program will consist of six sessions led by a pedagogy expert, in collaboration with a nephrologist a dietitian and hemodialysis nurses. The sessions will cover topics such as end-stage renal disease (ESRD), available treatments, potential complications, as well as dietary recommendations and self-care practices for managing arteriovenous fistulas (AVF).

Evaluations: Outcomes will be measured using validated questionnaires to assess knowledge, self-care practices, and treatment adherence. Biological measures (calcium, phosphate, and PTH levels, dry weight and interdialytic weight) will be taken before the intervention and two months after, in accordance with the center's usual assessments.

The questionnaires will be administered before the intervention and one month after the training to measure changes in patients' knowledge and practices.

Ethical Considerations: The study will adhere to all ethical considerations, including obtaining informed consent and the right for participants to withdraw at any time. The program has already received approval from the ethics committee, and it will also be approved by a nephrologist and a dietitian prior to implementation.

Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed using SPSS. Paired t-tests and independent t-tests will be used to compare results between groups. For non-normally distributed variables, non-parametric tests will be applied. Additionally, linear regression analysis will be conducted to examine associations between variables.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemodialysis
  • Self-care
  • End Stage Renal Disease

Keywords

  • Hemodialysis
  • Arteriovenous fistula self-care
  • Therapeutic adherence
  • Patient knowledge
  • Educational program
03

In context

Kidney Failure, Chronic

2,108 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic; 273 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is above the median of 57 across 1,569 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic.

Browse Kidney Failure, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Cadi Ayyad University is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) for at least 3 months
  • Patients aged > 18 years
  • Patients can understand Arabic
  • Patients expressing written to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria :

  • Patients with impaired consciousness or memory
  • Patients with communication impairments (auditory or verbal)
  • Patients with psychological impairment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control Group: Standard Care in Hemodialysis

    This arm of the study includes 34 patients undergoing hemodialysis who will notany intervention. Participants will continue to receive the usual care provided by the hemodialysis center. No educational sessions will be delivered in this group. Clinical outcomes, including health parameters, will be assessed in comparison to those in the intervention group after the study period.

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    This intervention group includes 36 patients at a public hemodialysis center in the Marrakech-Safi region. this group will engage in an educational program designed to enhance their understanding of chronic kidney disease and promote self-care for venous access. The curriculum covers topics such as disease etiology, symptoms, hemodialysis principles, medication roles, and dietary recommendations. The ultimate objective is to improve treatment adherence and optimize the management of dry weight and interdialytic weight, surpassing the standard care received by the control group.

    Behavioral: Educational intervention for patients undergoing hemodialysis in Morocco

Interventions

  • BehavioralEducational intervention for patients undergoing hemodialysis in Morocco

    This is the first educational intervention in Morocco to improve the knowledge, self-care, and biological characteristics of patients undergoing hemodialysis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hemodialysis Adherence

    * Assessment Tool: End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRDAQ) * Score Range: 0-600 * Unit: Numerical scale * Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better adherence to hemodialysis sessions.

    Time frame: Assessed in both groups before the intervention and after one month of intervention.

  2. Interdialytic Weight (IDW)

    Assessment Tool: Patients' records Unit: Kilograms (Kg) Measurement Method: Equal to the average of three successive interdialytic weights recorded

    Time frame: Assessed before the intervention and 2 months after the intervention.

  3. Assessment of Patient Knowledge

    This measure assesses patients' level of knowledge before and after the intervention. the tool used is the litératie questionnaire (specific to hemodialysis patients) by Shih et al. Score ranges from 0 to 26. a high score indicates high knowledge.

    Time frame: Assessment before the intervention and after one month, in both groups

  4. Self-Care of the Arteriovenous Fistula

    This measure will examine patients' self-care practices regarding their arteriovenous fistula (AVF) before and after the intervention. The tool is the "scale assessment of self-care behaviors with arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis" (ASBHD-AVF), with scores ranging from 16 to 80. A high score indicates high-level fistula self-care.

    Time frame: Assessment before the intervention and after 1 months in both groups.

  5. Medication Adherence

    * Assessment Tool: End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRDAQ) * Score Range: 0-200 * Unit: Numerical scale * Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better adherence to prescribed medications.

    Time frame: Assessed in both groups before the intervention and after one month of intervention.

  6. Diet Adherence

    * Assessment Tool: End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRDAQ) * Score Range: 0-200 * Unit: Numerical scale * Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better adherence to dietary recommendations

    Time frame: Assessed in both groups before the intervention and after one month of intervention.

  7. Fluid Restriction Adherence

    * Assessment Tool: End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRDAQ) * Score Range: 0-200 * Unit: Numerical scale * Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better adherence to water intake restrictions.

    Time frame: Assessed in both groups before the intervention and after one month of intervention.

  8. Overall Therapeutic Adherence

    * Assessment Tool: End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRDAQ). * Score Range: 0-1200 * Unit: Numerical scale * Interpretation: Higher overall scores indicate stronger adherence across all areas.

    Time frame: Assessed in both groups before the intervention and after one month of intervention

  9. Dry Weight

    * Assessment Tool: Patients' records * Unit: Kilograms (Kg)

    Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (last dry weight) and 2 months after the intervention.

  10. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    * Assessment Tool: Derived from patients' records * Unit: Kilograms per square meter (Kg/m²) * Calculation Method: BMI = Dry Weight (Kg) / Height (m²) using height from patients' records.

    Time frame: Calculated before the intervention (using last dry weight) and 2 months after the intervention.

  11. Calcium Level

    * Assessment Tool: Routine biological assessments (from patients' records) * Unit: Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)

    Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (from the last routine biological assessment) and 2 months after the intervention (from the routine biological assessment taken at least 2 months after the intervention).

  12. Phosphate Level

    * Assessment Tool: Routine biological assessments (from patients' records) * Unit: Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)

    Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (from the last routine biological assessment) and 2 months after the intervention (from the routine biological assessment taken at least 2 months after the intervention).

  13. Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)

    * Assessment Tool: Routine biological assessments (from patients' records) * Unit: Picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)

    Time frame: Assessed before the intervention (from the last routine biological assessment) and 2 months after the intervention (from the routine biological assessment taken at least 2 months after the intervention).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Disease Acceptance.

    - Assessment of disease acceptance: just before educational intervention. The score ranges from 8 to 40 points; a score of 8 indicates extremely low acceptance of the disease, and 40 indicates extremely high acceptance.

    Time frame: Assessment before the intervention, in both groups.

  2. Assessment of Perception of Social Support

    Assessment of perceived social support: just before the intervention, using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, scores range from 12 to 84. Higher scores express stronger feelings of being socially supported

    Time frame: Assenssement just before the educational intervention in both groups

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Youssoufia Hemodialysis Center, Youssoufia, Marrakech-Safi Region, Morocco
    Youssoufia, Marrakech-Safi, Morocco
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared for several reasons. First and foremost, protecting the confidentiality of participants is a priority. Given the sensitive nature of the data collected, it is essential to ensure that the identity and personal information of participants remain protected. Secondly, the logistical requirements associated with preparing the data for sharing can be complex and may require resources that we are unable to mobilize at this time. Finally, we aim to maintain the integrity of the data by limiting access to researchers with the necessary expertise and qualifications to analyze it. We are committed to adhering to ethical and regulatory standards for data protection throughout the study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06642090
Lead sponsor
Cadi Ayyad University
Responsible party
MAZZI Loubna (Principal Investigator, Cadi Ayyad University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 15, 2024
Start date
Oct 15, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 5, 2025
Completion
Feb 5, 2025
Last update
Feb 12, 2025

Study contacts

Loubna MAZZI, phD Candidate
principal investigator · Laboratory of Pharmacology, Neurobiology, Anthropobiology and Environment, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University
Mohamed CHERKAOUI, phD
study chair · Laboratory of Pharmacology, Neurobiology, Anthropobiology and Environment, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University
Abdelhafid BENKSIM, phd
study director · Laboratory of Pharmacology, Neurobiology, Anthropobiology and Environment, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion