CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06638840Updated Apr 25, 2025Results posted

Pediatric Performance and Satisfaction of Oticon Medical Ponto on Softband.

An observational study in Hearing Loss, sponsored by Oticon Medical. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-25.

Sponsored by Oticon Medical · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is a non-interventional, observational, study on users of Ponto sound processors who use their sound processors on a softband solution. The purpose of this study is to assess subjective benefit by evaluating performance and overall satisfaction of the Ponto on a Ponto Softband in pediatric users.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hearing Loss

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hearing Loss

1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 87 across 270 observational studies indexed under Hearing Loss.

Browse Hearing Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

Oticon Medical is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Ponto sound processor users

Inclusion criteria

  • currently using Oticon Medical Ponto sound processor on Oticon Medical Softband

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PEACH Overall Score

    Overall score from the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children questionnaire (PEACH questionnaire). PEACH score is calculated as percentage of the maximum score (thus score is on a scale of 0-100%). Higher score indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

  2. Quiet PEACH

    Quiet score from the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children questionnaire (PEACH questionnaire). PEACH score is calculated as percentage of the maximum score (thus score is on a scale of 0-100%). Higher score indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

  3. Noise PEACH

    Overall score from the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children questionnaire (PEACH questionnaire). PEACH score is calculated as percentage of the maximum score (thus score is on a scale of 0-100%). Higher score indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

  4. Total GCBI Score

    Total score on the Glasgow Childrens Benefit Inventory (GCBI) questionnaire. Score is calculated on a scale of -100 to +100. The higher the score, the more benefit.

    Time frame: Single time point for completing survey

  5. Psycho Social GCBI Score

    Psycho social score on the Glasgow Childrens Benefit Inventory (GCBI) questionnaire. Score is calculated on a scale of -100 to +100. The higher the score, the more benefit.

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

  6. Physical Health GCBI Score

    Physical health score on the Glasgow Childrens Benefit Inventory (GCBI) questionnaire. Score is calculated on a scale of -100 to +100. The higher the score, the more benefit.

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

  7. Behavior GCBI Score

    Behavior score on the Glasgow Childrens Benefit Inventory (GCBI) questionnaire. Score is calculated on a scale of -100 to +100. The higher the score, the more benefit.

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

  8. Vitality GCBI Score

    Vitality score on the Glasgow Childrens Benefit Inventory (GCBI) questionnaire. Score is calculated on a scale of -100 to +100. The higher the score, the more benefit.

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

  9. Use of Sound Processor

    Survey question: "Think about how much your child used their sound processor(s) over the past two weeks. On an average day, how many hours did they use the sound processor(s)?"

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

  10. Hearing Benefit

    Survey question: "Think about a situation where your child wanted to hear better, before receiving their sound processor. Over the past two weeks, how much has the sound processor(s) helped in that situation?"

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

  11. Overall Satisfaction - Ponto Experience

    Survey question: "How satisfied overall are you with your child's Ponto experience?"

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

  12. Satisfaction With Softband

    Survey question: "How satisfied overall are you with your child's softband?"

    Time frame: Single timepoint for completion of survey

07

Results

Posted Apr 25, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParticipants
Started64
Completed47
Not completed17

Outcome measures

PrimaryPEACH Overall Score

Overall score from the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children questionnaire (PEACH questionnaire). PEACH score is calculated as percentage of the maximum score (thus score is on a scale of 0-100%). Higher score indicate better performance.

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
PEACH Overall Score
Score on a scaleParticipants
PEACH Overall Score76.1 ± 14.4
PrimaryQuiet PEACH

Quiet score from the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children questionnaire (PEACH questionnaire). PEACH score is calculated as percentage of the maximum score (thus score is on a scale of 0-100%). Higher score indicate better performance.

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Quiet PEACH
Score on a scaleParticipants
Quiet PEACH81.0 ± 12.8
PrimaryNoise PEACH

Overall score from the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children questionnaire (PEACH questionnaire). PEACH score is calculated as percentage of the maximum score (thus score is on a scale of 0-100%). Higher score indicate better performance.

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Noise PEACH
Score on a scaleParticipants
Noise PEACH70.3 ± 18.0
PrimaryTotal GCBI Score

Total score on the Glasgow Childrens Benefit Inventory (GCBI) questionnaire. Score is calculated on a scale of -100 to +100. The higher the score, the more benefit.

Time frame:
Single time point for completing survey
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Total GCBI Score
Score on a scaleParticipants
Total GCBI Score38.6 ± 27.4
PrimaryPsycho Social GCBI Score

Psycho social score on the Glasgow Childrens Benefit Inventory (GCBI) questionnaire. Score is calculated on a scale of -100 to +100. The higher the score, the more benefit.

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Psycho Social GCBI Score
Score on a scaleParticipants
Psycho Social GCBI Score27.9 ± 42.9
PrimaryPhysical Health GCBI Score

Physical health score on the Glasgow Childrens Benefit Inventory (GCBI) questionnaire. Score is calculated on a scale of -100 to +100. The higher the score, the more benefit.

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Physical Health GCBI Score
Score on a scaleParticipants
Physical Health GCBI Score24.0 ± 13.3
PrimaryBehavior GCBI Score

Behavior score on the Glasgow Childrens Benefit Inventory (GCBI) questionnaire. Score is calculated on a scale of -100 to +100. The higher the score, the more benefit.

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Behavior GCBI Score
Score on a scaleParticipants
Behavior GCBI Score61.0 ± 34.5
PrimaryVitality GCBI Score

Vitality score on the Glasgow Childrens Benefit Inventory (GCBI) questionnaire. Score is calculated on a scale of -100 to +100. The higher the score, the more benefit.

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Vitality GCBI Score
Score on a scaleParticipants
Vitality GCBI Score37.8 ± 30
PrimaryUse of Sound Processor

Survey question: "Think about how much your child used their sound processor(s) over the past two weeks. On an average day, how many hours did they use the sound processor(s)?"

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Use of Sound Processor
ParticipantsParticipants
Less than 1 hour1
1 to 4 hours4
4 to 8 hours15
More than 8 hours43
None1
PrimaryHearing Benefit

Survey question: "Think about a situation where your child wanted to hear better, before receiving their sound processor. Over the past two weeks, how much has the sound processor(s) helped in that situation?"

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Hearing Benefit
ParticipantsParticipants
Helped not at all0
Helped slightly3
Helped moderately11
Helped quite a lot14
Helped very much35
Not answered1
PrimaryOverall Satisfaction - Ponto Experience

Survey question: "How satisfied overall are you with your child's Ponto experience?"

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Satisfaction - Ponto Experience
ParticipantsParticipants
Very much37
Quite a lot12
Moderately13
Slightly1
Not at all1
PrimarySatisfaction With Softband

Survey question: "How satisfied overall are you with your child's softband?"

Time frame:
Single timepoint for completion of survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Satisfaction With Softband
ParticipantsParticipants
Very much14
Quite a lot22
Moderately18
Slightly5
Not at all5

Adverse events

Collected over The study is a survey and did not include adverse event assessment. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Participants———

Baseline characteristics

All 64 participants who participated in the survey

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Participants
Mean6.0 ± 4.0
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Participants
Gender — Male35
Gender — Female28
Gender — Do not wish to say1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Participants
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Participants
United States64
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Oticon Medical
    Somerset, New Jersey 08873, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 26, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06638840
Lead sponsor
Oticon Medical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 15, 2024
Start date
Jul 11, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 2, 2024
Completion
Oct 2, 2024
Results posted
Apr 25, 2025
Last update
Apr 25, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion