ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05154188PACIFICUpdated Mar 28, 2024

Post Approval Study to Assure the ContInued saFety and effectIveness of Neuro Cochlear Implant System in Adult Users

An observational study in Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral, Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe and Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound, sponsored by Oticon Medical. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-28.

Sponsored by Oticon Medical · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

On June 23, 2021, the Oticon Medical Neuro Cochlear Implant System (NCIS) was granted premarket approval (PMA) in the US to treat individuals 18 years or older, with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, who obtain limited benefit from appropriately fitted hearing aid(s).

To help assure the continued safety and effectiveness of an approved device, a post-approval study was required as a condition of approval under 21 CFR 814.82(a)(2).

The purpose of this study is to provide longer-term data on the safety and effectiveness of the Neuro Cochlear Implant System under general conditions of use in the postmarket environment.

Read the detailed description

The post-approval study will be an open-label, prospective, multi-center, single-arm, non-randomized, self-controlled clinical trial in 10 clinical sites in the US.

The purpose of this study is to provide longer-term data on the safety and effectiveness of the Neuro Cochlear Implant System under general conditions of use in the postmarket environment. This study will be conducted as a prospective, non-controlled, non-randomized study in 10 clinical sites.

A total of 60 subjects, newly treated will be enrolled. Study subjects will be followed for 3 years post implantation of the device with a target follow-up rate of 80% at the end of the study

The primary safety endpoint is the comparison of the type and frequency of adverse events and serious adverse events observed during the study period. The effectiveness endpoints will include the within-subject differences for sentence recognition as evaluated with the AzBio test.

The study will include the following visits: baseline, 1-month post-surgery (activation date), 3 months, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months, and 36-months post-activation. Each participant will serve as their own control with baseline measurements.

The total estimated duration of the study is 60 months: 24 months of recruitment and 36 months of subject participation.

The first patient is expected to be included within 6 months of study approval (obtained on August 19, 2021).

02

Conditions studied

  • Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral
  • Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe
  • Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound

Keywords

  • candidates for a cochlear implantation surgery
  • patients aged 18 years and older
03

In context

Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

346 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; 100 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 70 across 86 observational studies indexed under Hearing Loss, Sensorineural.

Browse Hearing Loss, Sensorineural studies →

Lead sponsor

Oticon Medical is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  • The current post-approval study concerning the NCIS will enroll a total of 60 subjects, newly treated. Patients will be regular candidates for a cochlear implantation surgery, according to the indication criteria of the Neuro Cochlear Implant System and the device will be used according to its intended purpose.
  • 60 subjects must meet the eligibility criteria
  • The patient can be an existing audiology patient of the CI clinic or can be referred from an outside hearing aid clinic

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals 18 years of age or older
  • Obtain limited benefit from appropriately fitted hearing aids
  • Bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss _ Severe-to-profound hearing loss is determined by a pure-tone average (PTA) superior or equal (≥) to 70 dB HL at 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz. Limited benefit from amplification is defined by scores of 50% or less on a validated sentence recognition test in quiet (AzBio sentences), in the best-aided listening condition _

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous cochlear implantation
  • Ossification or any other cochlear anomaly that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array
  • Active external or middle ear infections or tympanic membrane perforation in the ear to be implanted
  • Presence of medical to middle-ear or inner-ear surgery or anesthesia as required
  • Diagnosis of retro-cochlear pathology
  • Diagnosis of auditory neuropathy
  • Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the surgical procedure and use of the prosthetic device
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with all requirements
  • Additional cognitive, medical, or social handicaps that would prevent completion of all study requirements
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceNeuro Cochlear Implant system

    Patients will be regular candidates for a cochlear implantation surgery, according to the indication criteria of the Neuro Cochlear Implant System and the device will be used according to its intended purpose

    Also known as: Neuro ZtiCLA implant, Neuro ZtiEVO implant, Neuro 2 Sound Processor, Neuro 2 SP, Neuro Zti

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stability of improvement of speech perception performance at 12- and 36-months post-activation with AzBio sentence scores.

    Average scores for AzBio sentence tests will be recorded in Quiet at 12- and 36-months post-activation and compared to pre-operative (baseline) measures. The AzBio sentence test is a validated sentence recognition test in quiet and has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.

    Time frame: At 12- and 36-months post-activation (visit 9 and visit 11)

  2. Safety outcome

    Occurrence and severity of all adverse events and serious adverse events occuring during the study period. All device failures (internal and external parts) will be documented.

    Time frame: From Visit 1(8- 12 weeks pre-surgery) to Visit 12 (36 Months post-activation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stability of improvement of speech perception performance at 12- and 36-months post-activation with CNC-words scores.

    Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) scores will be recorded in Quiet at 12- and 36-months post-activation and compared to pre-operative (baseline) measures. The CNC word test has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.

    Time frame: At 12- and 36-months post-activation (visit 9 & visit 12)

  2. Stability of outcomes over time using AzBio Sentence scores at 1 month in Quiet.

    Scores for AzBio sentence tests will be recorded in Quiet at 1-month post-activation in quiet and compared to pre-operative (baseline) measures. The AzBio sentence test is a validated sentence recognition test in quiet and has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.

    Time frame: At 1 month post-activation (Visit 6)

  3. Stability of outcomes over time using AzBio sentences in Quiet and Noise at 3- ; 6- and 24-months post-activation

    Average scores for AzBio sentence tests will be recorded in Quiet at 3- ; 6- and 24-months post-activation and compared to pre-operative (baseline) measures. The AzBio sentence test is a validated sentence recognition test and has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.

    Time frame: at 3 months(visit 7), 6 months (visit 9) and 24 months (visit 11)

  4. Stability of outcomes over time using CNC word scores at 3-, 6- and 24-months

    Average scores for CNC word test will be recorded at 3-, 6- and 24 months post-activation and compared to pre-operative (baseline) measures. The Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word test has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.

    Time frame: At 3 months(visit 7), 6 months (visit 9) and 24 months (visit 11)

  5. Stability of outcomes over time for patients under a bimodal condition (i.e., patient wearing a contralateral hearing aid).

    Average scores for AzBio sentence tests will be recorded in Noise (at +10dB SNR), at 3- and 12-months post-activation and compared to pre-operative (baseline) measures. The AzBio sentence test is a validated sentence recognition test and has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.

    Time frame: At 3-months post activation (visit 7) and 12 months (visit 9)

  6. Longitudinal measures of patient reported outcomes in a newly-implanted population

    Patient reported outcome (PRO) measures including quality of life, listening effort and tinnitus at 6-,12-,24- and 36 months post-activation

    Time frame: At 6-,12-,24- and 36 months post-activation (Visits 8,9,11,12)

  7. Longitudinal measures of cognitive abilities in a newly implanted population

    Scores on a cognitive assessment at 12-24 and 36 months post-activation

    Time frame: At 12-24 and 36 months post-activation (Visits 9,11,12)

  8. Longitudinal programming parameters (T- and C- levels)

    T and C levels collected at all intervals

    Time frame: At activation (Visit 5), then from 3 months post-activation (V7) throught study completion (an average of 3 years post activation)

  9. Longitudinal device functionality measures (impedances)

    Electrode impedances collected at all intervals

    Time frame: At activation (Visit 5), then from 3 months post-activation (V7) throught study completion (an average of 3 years post activation)

  10. Pedictors of outcomes: Electrode impedances collected at all intervals

    Electrode impedances collected at all intervals

    Time frame: At surgery visit (Visit 3 baseline visit) then from activation, 1-month post surgery( visit 5) throught study completion (an average of 3 years post activation)

  11. Pedictors of outcomes: eCAP responses collected in the operating room

    eCAP responses collected in the operating room

    Time frame: From activation (visit 5) throught study completion (an average of 3 years post activation)

  12. Proportion of major postsurgical complications and AEs over time

    Surgeon perception of handling of the Neuro Zti and electrode array as well as information related to surgical technique

    Time frame: At surgery visit (i.e. visit 3, baseline visit, )

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2025; primary completion for Feb 2027, 17 months later.

Of 42 observational studies under Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, half reached primary completion within 49 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13. This study's planned 17 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 13, 2021
First posted
Dec 13, 2021
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 2029
Last update
Mar 28, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05154188
Lead sponsor
Oticon Medical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 13, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 28, 2024

Study contacts

Michel HOEN, PHD
Contact
MHOE@oticonmedical.com
+33679191047
Phil Segel, PHD
Contact
phsg@oticonmedical.com
+1 908 200 1751 (mobile)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion