CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06636370DENSE-2Updated May 11, 2026

Supplemental Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breast Tissue: the DENSE-2 Trial

An interventional study of Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and Abbreviated MRI (AB-MRI) in Breast Cancer, sponsored by C.H. van Gils. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to female participants aged 49 Years to 72 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-11.

Sponsored by C.H. van Gils · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
49 Years to 72 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Women with extremely dense breasts (nearly all glandular and connective tissue, little fatty tissue) have a 3-6 times higher risk of breast cancer than women with very low breast density. Moreover, due to the masking effect of the dense tissue, any breast tumours present are more difficult to detect in these women. With the results of the DENSE trial, the investigators showed that among women with extremely dense breasts, a combination of MRI and mammography could detect tumours earlier than mammography only. As the implementation of MRI in the screening program induces considerable costs and capacity requirements, the Dutch Ministry of Health would like to investigate whether cheaper and acceptable alternatives can be implemented more easily. In the DENSE-2 study, proposed here, we will investigate contrast-enhanced mammography and an abbreviated form of MRI as alternatives, in a large-scale randomized trial, within the current population-based screening program.

Read the detailed description

Women with extremely dense breast tissue have a higher risk of developing breast cancer and at the same time, mammography has limited value for these women. Currently, these women are not offered supplemental screening. Therefore, the investigators of the DENSE-2 trial will study supplemental CEM and AB-MRI screening in women with extremely dense breast tissue within the population-based breast cancer screening program because these modalities are expected to have higher diagnostic accuracy than tomosynthesis and ultrasound. In addition, these modalities are expected to be less expensive and require less capacity than a full MRI protocol as examined in the DENSE trial. For both CEM and AB-MRI, no results are currently available from a prospective screening study. The DENSE-2 trial is a randomized controlled trial comparing two intervention arms (CEM [intervention arm A] and abbreviated MRI [intervention arm B]) each with mammography [control arm C].

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • breast cancer screening
  • extremely dense breasts
  • early detection
  • contrast-enhanced mammography
  • abbreviated MRI
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36,000 is above the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with C.H. van Gils as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
49 Years to 72 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant in the Dutch population-based breast cancer screening program with a negative mammography result (BI-RADS classification 1 or 2).
  • Extremely dense breast tissue (assessed with Quantra software, category D).
  • Age between 49-72 years (women are invited to the Dutch screening program in the year they turn 50, so the minimum age is 49 years. The maximum age for inclusion is 72 years to ensure that women can still participate in a second round of supplemental screening).
  • Living in the service area (travel distance of up to 60 km) of the 15 participating hospitals.
  • Absence of breast implants (Quantra cannot provide an accurate density determination for breasts with implants).
  • No objection to data sharing.
  • Not a participant in the DENSE trial or STREAM trial (participants in the DENSE and STREAM trials are known to the Dutch screening organization).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The additional exclusion criteria for the intervention arms are checked after randomization and recruitment (this order is due to the pre-randomization design):

  • Presence of in-body metals (only for AB-MRI, this involves specific metals and is asked by telephone).
  • Previous allergic reaction to the provided contrast agent.
  • Renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate \<30 ml/min) (only for CEM, is checked for with questionnaire I and possibly renal function measurement).
  • Severe claustrophobia (only for AB-MRI).
  • Severe obesity (weight >150 kg) (only for AB-MRI).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    This group receives biennial mammography only within the current Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening program. This group will not be informed about the study (pre-randomisation design)

  • Experimental
    Contrast-enhanced Mammography (CEM)

    This group receives supplemental screening with CEM after a negative mammography result in the Dutch National Breast Cancer screening program

    Diagnostic Test: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)

  • Experimental
    Abbreviated MRI (AB-MRI)

    This group receives supplemental screening with AB-MRI after a negative mammography result in the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening program

    Diagnostic Test: Abbreviated MRI (AB-MRI)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testContrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)

    This intervention group receives supplemental screening with CEM after a negative screening result within the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening program

  • Diagnostic testAbbreviated MRI (AB-MRI)

    This intervention group receives supplemental screening with AB-MRI after a negative screening result within the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening program

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Interval Cancer Rate

    Measured as a breast cancer diagnosed in between two screening rounds

    Time frame: 0 - 3 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Advanced Cancer detectio Advanced Cancer rate

    Advanced cancer is defined as TNM stage II or higher

    Time frame: 0 - 3 year

  2. Cancer detection rate

    The number of breast cancers detected by CEM or AB-MRI

    Time frame: 0 - 3 year

  3. False positive rate

    The number with a false positive result after CEM or AB-MRI

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  4. Participant experience with CEM - 1

    screen-specific item questionnaire (SSI)

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  5. Participant experience with CEM - 2

    Self-developed questionnaire

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  6. Participant experience with CEM - 3

    Focus group interviews

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  7. Participant experience with AB-MRI - 1

    screen-specific item questionnaire (SSI)

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  8. Participant experience with AB-MRI - 2

    Self-developed questionnaire

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  9. Participant experience with AB-MRI - 3

    Focus group interviews

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  10. Health-professional experience with CEM

    Self-developed questionnaire

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  11. Health-professional experience with AB-MRI

    Self-developed questionnaire

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  12. Estimated rate of overdiagnosis

    Simulation with the MISCAN software

    Time frame: 0-5 years

  13. Cost-effectiveness

    Simulation with the MISCAN software

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  14. Breast tumor size

    mm

    Time frame: 0-5 years

  15. Breast tumor stage

    TNM classification

    Time frame: 0-5 years

  16. Positive Predictive Value (PPV)

    Using the histological diagnosis as the reference test

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  17. Biopsy rate

    Per 1000 women screened with one of the modalities

    Time frame: 0-5 year

  18. Referral rate

    Per 1000 women screened per screening modality

    Time frame: 0-5 years

  19. Mortality rate

    Simulation with MISCAN software

    Time frame: 0-5 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • UMC Utrecht
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06636370
Lead sponsor
C.H. van Gils
Collaborators
University Medical Center Groningen, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Radboud University Medical Center, Rijnstate Hospital, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Maastricht University Medical Center, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Erasmus Medical Center, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, St. Antonius Hospital, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), Bevolkingsonderzoek Nederland, Borstkankervereniging Nederland
Responsible party
C.H. van Gils (Professor Dr., UMC Utrecht) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 10, 2024
Start date
Nov 11, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
May 11, 2026

Study contacts

Carla van Gils, Prof
Contact
dense-2@umcutrecht.nl
0031-88-7568181
Evelyn Monninkhof, Dr.
Contact
e.monninkhof@umcutrecht.nl
Carla van Gils, Prof.
principal investigator · UMC Utrecht

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion