ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06629675MuSiCUpdated Apr 16, 2025

Make Every Step Count: Personalised Music Feedback to Walking for People Living With COPD

An interventional study of Music walking application BeatClearWalker (BCW) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease and Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease, sponsored by University of Leicester. Recruiting at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-16.

Sponsored by University of Leicester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 12 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by University of Leicester — 5 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive · University of Leicester.

Started
2025
the only one that year
No phase
3 of 12
3 open now
Registered
11th of 12
by date

Among the 12 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by University of Leicester, this one is the only one that started in 2025, is one of 3 with no phase, and was the 11th registered.

By phase

12 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Observational7 · 2 open
No phasethis study3 · 3 open
Phase 21 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2016; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2025.

What they test

Size and results

Median enrollment 80 across the 5 interventional studies, 160 across the 7 observational. Of the 6 that completed or were terminated, 3 (50%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 12 studies in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive by University of Leicester, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is an evidence-based intervention to effectively manage the physiological and psychological effects of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The aims of PR are to improve symptoms of COPD, increase exercise capacity, increase independency, improve overall behaviour related to health (like exercising more), and enhance quality of life. The cornerstone of PR programmes is aerobic exercise prescription. Typically, walking exercise is used, and the prescription is individualised for each patient based on their maximal walking exercise capacity. However, adherence to walking exercise is challenging for service users, particularly when unsupervised at home. The use of music during exercise shows promise as a tool to decrease the perception of fatigue and increase motivation, but the integration of music via smartphone applications to support walking exercise adherence during PR has not been explored. This project aims to assess if a new mobile application BeatClearWalker (BCW) intervention is practical, acceptable, and effectively used by people living with COPD. The app is designed to help people living with COPD attending PR adhere to their prescribed walking pace during exercise. The BCW app provides real-time, personalised music feedback through music degradation to optimise the dose of walking exercise.

Read the detailed description

Previous research has shown that adherence to the prescribed walking exercise intensity is challenging for individuals with COPD and that methods to provide further support are needed. Using activity monitors and trackers to give feedback can increase the walking exercise participation of people living with COPD. However, it has been reported that more than half of steps taken during exercise were below the prescribed pace. It is possible to individually prescribe exercise intensity by deriving cadence (steps taken per minute) from the ISWT and ESWT using activity monitor. Furthermore, activity monitors have been used to measure level of adherence to the intensity of the prescribed walking exercise prescriptions in the context of PR and chronic respiratory diseases.

Listening to music in daily life can decrease stress and improve the psychological well-being. Implementing music to enhance exercise performance has been utilised with different populations. Auditory feedback in the form of listening to music is one example where exercising to music can be utilised as distraction from fatigue perception or used as a motivational tool to exercise in a healthy population. Previous studies have investigated the effect of listening to music while exercising at different intensities and music tempos on fatigue perception and have shown a positive effect in decreasing the perception of fatigue. In addition, the effect of choosing the preferred versus non-preferred music genre on repeated sprints showed significant improvement in motivation to exercise and lower perceived exertion rates in the preferred music genre group. Similarly, in COPD, listening to music as distractive auditory stimuli while exercising decreases breathlessness and fatigue symptoms resulting in increased aerobic capacity and HRQOL. In another study, individuals with COPD who listened to music while performing high-intensity exercise, showed a reduction in dyspnoea, which was associated with higher tolerance of high-intensity exercise as measured by endurance time. The findings of a previous study showed that participants who listened to music can perform significantly more exercise compared to participants who listened to grey noise or silence. Paced walking to music with COPD participants showed significant improvement in dyspnoea, exercise tolerance, HRQoL and fatigue. In the context of unsupervised walking exercise among individuals living with COPD, paced walking to interval beeps sound as such in metronomes to maintain the walking exercise intensity had been investigated previously. In a prospective observational clinical trial, the effect of home-based PR on exercise capacity and HRQoL using paced walking to metronome was investigated. The results showed improvements in maximal exercise capacity (six minute walk test: 6MWT) and HRQoL (SGRQ). However, the constant rhythm such as in metronome style feedback may not be interesting overtime which can make walking exercises less engaging and lead to reduced motivation for long-term adherence.

Combining the effect of paced walking when listening to 'metronome style' feedback and preferred music to support walking exercise might offer a more enjoyable way to coach people living with COPD to walk for exercise at their prescribed intensity. This principle has been investigated in adult without reported diseases population using a mobile application (app), the BeatClearWalker (BCW), as shown in the link (https://youtu.be/MLy4GA8_eUc?si=oQL3mklA2bRKbnQl). The BCW is a fitness smartphone application that monitors walking cadence and helps individuals to walk at their individually-prescribed cadence and maintain that cadence. The app is designed to work on smartphones run by Android software only. Despite a considerable number of fitness applications that monitor walking distance, this is the first application designed to support walking and provide real-time feedback about cadence through music sound quality. The application allows service users to listen to any music while walking and apply dynamic live audio feedback to help individuals to walk at and maintain the pre-set individualised target walking cadence which can be entered on the application. The real-time, hands-free audio feedback is noticeable and designed to disrupt the quality of the played music. The feedback comes in two forms: (1) clear music, similar when listening to any typical music played in streaming music player or (2) degradation of music audio quality. The music will play without effect if the individuals walk at or above their targeted cadence. Once the walking cadence drops below the targeted, the quality of the music will be degraded and will return to normal once the individual reaches the targeted cadence again.

03

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
  • Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease

Keywords

  • Auditory feedback
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases
  • Digital Health Technology
  • Exercise
  • Exercise adherence
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation
  • Mobile applications
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing and able to provide for participation in the study.
  • The patient is referred for PR at the UHL.
  • The patient has a confirmed diagnosis of using spirometry (based on GOLD criteria)
  • Male or female, aged 18+ years.
  • Able to communicate in written and spoken English.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide valid .
  • Lack of motivation to participate in PR programme.
  • Any- absolute or relative to exercise training.
  • Has had a cardiac event within last 6 weeks
  • Severe psychiatric disorders
  • Patients with a history of MRSA +ve screens (patients can be assessed and given an exercise programme but cannot attend the classes. Patients need to have 3 consecutive -ve MRSA swabs before they can attend).
  • Unable to understand written or spoken English.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Music Walking Application BeatClearWalker (BCW)

    As it is a single-arm feasibility study, all participants will be allocated to one arm, receiving routine personalised walking exercise while listening to music from the smartphone using the music walking application BeatClearWalker during their Pulmonary rehabilitation Programme.

    Device: Music walking application BeatClearWalker (BCW)

Interventions

  • DeviceMusic walking application BeatClearWalker (BCW)

    The music walking application (BCW) is a smartphone application that can monitor the walking pace and allow individuals to listen to music and give immediate feedback so they can correct their walking pace to match their target walking speed, as prescribed by the healthcare professional. The application provides real-time audio feedback in the form of music; the music sound quality will reduce whenever the walking speed drops below or exceeds the participant\'s target walking speed. Simply, the application will work to supervise service users while exercising walking. The investigators are trying to assess the feasibility of this application with service users during their Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme (at the hospital/ home) to find out how participants interact with listening to music while exercise walking and how well they're able to keep to their target speed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of recruited participants who do not use the BCW app.

    Time frame: Post PR 6-8 weeks.

  2. The proportion of recruited participants who complete the follow-up assessment.

    Time frame: Upon the completion of the PR programme at 6-8 weeks.

  3. The proportion of patients who meet the eligibility criteria.

    The percentage of eligible from those who were screened against the eligibility criteria

    Time frame: 11 months

  4. The proportion of individuals with COPD who express interest in participating in the study.

    Time frame: 11 months

  5. The proportion of eligible participants who provide consent to enrol.

    After meeting the eligibility criteria at the screening stage.

    Time frame: 11 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnoea Scale

    Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnoea Scale , measuring the level of breathlessness. Scale: Minimum value: 1 Maximum value: 5. The higher the score, the worse the outcome (breathlessness).

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-PR) and Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

  2. Generic Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

    The EQ-5D-5L evaluates generic health status, with five dimensions of health assessed. Scale: The descriptive system results in a single score; higher scores generally indicate worse outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-PR) and Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

  3. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2)

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2) is a brief screening tool for generalized anxiety disorder, measuring the frequency of anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks. Scale: Minimum score is 0, and Maximum score is 6. Higher scores indicate worse anxiety symptoms. A score of 3 points is the preferred cut-off for identifying possible cases and in which further diagnostic evaluation for generalized anxiety disorder is warranted.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-PR) and Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

  4. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7)

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a 7-item scale that measures the severity of generalized anxiety disorder symptoms over the past two weeks. Scale: The following cut-offs correlate with level of anxiety severity: Score 0-4: Minimal Anxiety Score 5-9: Mild Anxiety Score 10-14: Moderate Anxiety Score greater than 15: Severe Anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-PR) and Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

  5. Walking exercise time at an individually prescribed cadence over the total time spent in walking exercise (Percent).

    Data of the walking exercise will be collected during PR from BCW exercise log.

    Time frame: Data collected after each walking exercise session during the PR programme (6-8 weeks).

  6. Walking exercise time below the individually prescribed cadence. (Percent)

    Data of the walking exercise will be collected during PR from BCW exercise log.

    Time frame: Data collected after each walking exercise session during the PR programme (6-8 weeks).

  7. The proportion of time spent walking over the prescribed walking exercise duration as measured during the Endurance Shuttle Walking test. (Percent)

    Data will be collected after each walking exercise session during PR from BCW exercise log.

    Time frame: Data collected after each walking exercise session during the PR programme (6-8 weeks).

  8. Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS).

    It will assess the adherence levels of individuals to their exercise prescription. Scale: The score range, 0 to 24. Higher scores generally indicate better adherence (24 indicates best adherence). The scale will be used post pulmonary rehabilitation programme

    Time frame: Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

  9. Walking exercise time above the prescribed cadence. (Percent)

    Data of the walking exercise will be collected during PR from BCW exercise log.

    Time frame: Data collected after each walking exercise session during the PR programme (6-8 weeks).

  10. Exercise Capacity test (Incremental Shuttle Walking test [ISWT])

    Incremental Shuttle Walking Test, Distance walked in meters

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-PR) and Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

  11. Exercise Capacity (Endurance Shuttle Walking test [ESWT])

    Endurance Shuttle Walking Test (ESWT), Time walked in seconds.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-PR) and Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

  12. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) measures the severity of depression based on 9 criteria over the past 2 weeks. Scale: Minimum score: 0, Maximum score: 27. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. Total scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cutpoints for mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-PR) and Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

  13. CRQ-SR (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire - Self-Reported)

    Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire - Self-Reported (CRQ-SR) measures quality of life in individuals with chronic respiratory diseases. Scale: Minimum and maximum values vary by subscale. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-PR) and Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

  14. Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) measures the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past 2 weeks. Scale: A PHQ-2 score ranges from 0-6. A score of 3 as the optimal cutpoint when using the PHQ-2 to screen for depression. If the score is 3 or greater, major depressive disorder is likely.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-PR) and Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

  15. COPD Assessment Test (CAT)

    The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) evaluates the impact of COPD on the individual life. Scale: Minimum score: 0, Maximum score: 40. Higher scores indicate worse health status.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-PR) and Follow-up (Post-PR, at 6-8 weeks).

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory
    Leicester, Leicestershire LE3 9QP, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
  • University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL)
    Leicester, Leicestershire LE3 9QP, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2025; primary completion for Sep 2025, 4 months later.

Of 1,094 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,181 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 26, 2024
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
StartEst.
Apr 20, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 12, 2025
CompletionEst.
Sep 26, 2025
Last update
Apr 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06629675
Collaborators
University of Strathclyde, University Hospitals, Leicester
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
Start date
Apr 20, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 12, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 26, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 16, 2025

Study contacts

Omar Alhothaly, MSc
Contact
oaea3@leicester.ac.uk
+441162502758
Mark Orme, PhD
Contact
mwo4@leicester.ac.uk
Mark Orme, PhD
principal investigator · University of Leicester
Linzy Houchen-Wolloff, PhD
study director · NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Sally J Singh, PhD
study chair · NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion