ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06628765Updated Nov 12, 2024

Two Types of Single-use Flexible Ureteroscopies for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones in Children

An interventional study of 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) and 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S) in Urinary Stone, sponsored by The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 0 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-12.

Sponsored by The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The single-use digital flexible Ureteroscopy (fURS) is commonly used for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones. The size of the outer diameter of the fURS can affect the safety, efficacy, and medical costs of the treatment. Particularly for children, their ureters are thinner and more tortuous compared to adults, which places higher demands on medical devices. The investigators are interested in determining if the performance of the two different sizes of fURS (6.3 Fr vs. 8.6 Fr) are equivalent. This study will have guiding significance for the selection of upper urinary tract stones surgery in children in the future.

Read the detailed description

The single-use digital fURS is a sterile, disposable, flexible endoscope. Compared to traditional reusable digital flexible endoscopes, single-use digital fURS has lower maintenance costs, is easier to operate, and effectively avoids cross-infection between patients. With technological advancements, the size of single-use digital fURS has become increasingly slim, making them particularly suitable for children with narrow and tortuous ureters who suffered urinary stones. Currently, the single-use digital fURS used in our unit has an outer diameter of 8.6Fr. For younger children, the success rate of the first insertion of the fURS is still relatively low. When the fURS cannot pass through the ureter, it is necessary to actively dilate the ureter with a balloon in one stage, or passively dilate it with a urethral stent during the procedure to facilitate a second-stage fURS procedure. This not only increases the risk of ureteral injury but also incurs additional medical expenses. Recently, HugeMed Company has launched a single-use digital fURS with an outer diameter of 6.3 Fr, which is currently the thinnest single-use fURS in the world, and its effectiveness and safety have been preliminarily verified in clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the 6.3 Fr fURS (HU30S) and the 8.6 Fr fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) in the clinical treatment of upper urinary tract stones in children.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Stone

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Urinary Stone
  • Flexible Ureteroscopy
  • Children
03

In context

Urinary Calculi

94 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Calculi; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 120 across 61 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Calculi.

Browse Urinary Calculi studies →

Lead sponsor

The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 69 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for individual renal stones ranging in size from 5 mm to 20 mm in all intrarenal locations (If there are multiple stones present, the total stone burden in cross section should not exceed 20 mm)
  • Patients \< 14 years
  • For children younger than 8 years old, the form is signed by the parents; for children older than 8 years old, the informed consent form is signed by both the parents and the child themselves.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with uncontrolled urinary tract infections or coagulation disorders and other for surgery before the operation.
  • Children with severe renal insufficiency, anatomical or functional solitary kidney, known nephrocalcinosis, and other significant comorbidities that are not suitable for participating in the study.
  • Children who refuse to participate in this study.
  • Any other reason that in the opinion of the investigator would make the participant unsuitable for enrollment in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC)

    8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) arm received 8.6 Fr single-use fURS

    Device: 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC)

  • Experimental
    6.3 Fr single-use fURS (HugeMed, HU30S)

    6.3 Fr single-use fURS (HugeMed, HU30S) arm received 6.3 Fr single-use fURS

    Device: 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S)

Interventions

  • Device8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC)

    Comparative device

  • Device6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S)

    Device being tested

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The success rate of the first fURS insertion

    The first insertion of fURS is successful without the need for balloon dilation or passive dilation with a stent.

    Time frame: During the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ureteral access sheath placement (Yes/No)

    Whether a ureteral access sheath is placed during the procedure

    Time frame: During the procedure

  2. Balloon dilation rate

    Due to difficulty in passing the fURS through the ureter, balloon dilation of the ureter is performed during the procedure

    Time frame: During the procedure

  3. Pre-placement rate of double-J stents

    Due to difficulty in passing the fURS through the ureter, the double-J stent is placed during the surgery to passively dilate the ureter, facilitating a second-stage fURS procedure

    Time frame: During the procedure

  4. Surgical duration

    From the initiation of fURS insertion to the completion of lithotripsy, the fURS is withdrawn from the body

    Time frame: During the procedure

  5. Blood loss

    Intraoperative blood loss

    Time frame: During the procedure

  6. Indwelling catheter duration

    Indwelling catheter duration postoperatively

    Time frame: Three days postoperatively

  7. Postoperative hospital stay

    Postoperative hospital stay

    Time frame: Up to one week postoperatively

  8. Perioperative complications

    Pain (e.g. dysuria and lumbar pain), Hematuria, Frequency and urgency of urination, Fever

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to two months postoperatively

  9. Stone-free rate at 4 weeks postoperatively

    Stone-free status was evaluated at 4-week and defined as a single residual fragment ≤2 mm

    Time frame: 4 weeks postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2025, 6 months after the start.

Of 31 interventional studies with no phase under Urinary Calculi, half reached primary completion within 74 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 79. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 28, 2024
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
StartActual
Oct 8, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Apr 8, 2025
CompletionEst.
Apr 8, 2025
Last update
Nov 12, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06628765
Lead sponsor
The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Responsible party
Hongbo Liu (Principal Investigator, The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
Start date
Oct 8, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 8, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 8, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 12, 2024

Study contacts

Aimei Ma
Contact
maaimei@zju.edu.cn
+86 15888864134
Hongbo Liu
principal investigator · Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion