CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06627491Updated Oct 9, 2024

Influence of Fast and Slow Imagined Muscle Contractions on Muscle Function or Central Nervous System Properties

An interventional study of Imagined muscle contractions in Healthy, sponsored by Kennesaw State University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-09.

Sponsored by Kennesaw State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn if imagining fast or slow muscle contractions causes different responses for nervous system excitability and muscle function in young, healthy males and females in. The main questions are:

Does imagining fast muscle contractions cause greater nervous system excitability compared to imagining slow muscle contractions?

Does imagining fast muscle contractions increase muscle function compared to imagining slow muscle contractions?

A control condition (rest) will be compared with two intervention conditions: imagining fast and imagining slow conditions, to determine if the fast and slow increase outcomes more than control and if fast has the greatest response.

Participants will:

  • Attend 4 laboratory visits
  • Perform 50 imagined contractions fast or slow, but with no physical movement
  • Physical muscle contractions and non-invasive brain stimulation would be completed before and after each condition.
Read the detailed description

Participants will complete 4 laboratory visits in a randomized order, including a familiarization session, a control condition, and 2 conditions involving imaginary muscle contractions. During visits involving imaginary muscle contractions, participants will complete 2 sets of 25 repetitions of either fast (i.e., less than 1 second to peak torque increase torque as fast as possible) or slow (i.e., 3 seconds to peak torque) isometric elbow flexions. Before and after each condition, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation will be delivered to the primary motor cortex to measure the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials and the duration of the resulting silent periods in the bicep brachii to quantify changes in corticospinal excitability and inhibition, respectively. Rapid maximal voluntary isometric contractions will be used to measure changes in rate of torque development, peak torque, and rate of muscle activation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy

Keywords

  • Muscle strength
  • Nervous System
  • Motor Imagery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kennesaw State University is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Be between the ages of 18 - 30
  • Healthy (no medical conditions)
  • If female, must be taking the same monophasic oral contraceptive for the past 6 months
  • Have a body mass index between 18.5 - 30 kg/m2
  • Have not performed structured cardiovascular or resistance exercise in past 3 years
  • Be right-handed
  • Not currently taking stimulants, antipsychotic, anxiety, or depression medications
  • Have not suffered an upper extremity musculoskeletal injury within the past year

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is not deemed appropriate depending on your responses to the TMS-specific questionnaire
  • Being ambidextrous
  • Although rare, you will be excluded if discernable muscle activation responses are not possible via TMS
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
18 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Participants will rest quietly with eyes closed during the control condition.

  • Experimental
    Fast

    Participants will imagine 2 blocks of 25 fast muscle contractions separated by 30 sec

    Behavioral: Imagined muscle contractions

  • Experimental
    Slow

    Participants will imagine 2 blocks of 25 slow muscle contractions separated by 30 sec

    Behavioral: Imagined muscle contractions

Interventions

  • BehavioralImagined muscle contractions

    The intervention involved imagining, with no physical movement, of muscle contractions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in rate of torque development as measured by newton-meters per second

    A measure of the capacity to increase muscle torque rapidly as determined by the slope of the torque-time curve

    Time frame: Baseline, minute 20

  2. Change in nervous system excitability as measured by electromyographic waveform aplitude following motor cortex stimulation

    A measure of excitability for the corticospinal tract

    Time frame: Baseline, minute 20

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in isometric bicep strength as measured by newton-meters of torque

    Isometric strength of a muscle

    Time frame: Baseline, minute 20

  2. Change in agonist muscle activation as measured by electromyography amplitude

    A measure of the capacity at which the muscle is activated by the nervous system

    Time frame: Baseline, minute 20

  3. Change in antagonist co-activation as measured by electromyography amplitude

    A measure of the capacity at which the antagonist muscle is activated by the nervous system

    Time frame: Baseline, minute 20

  4. Change in rate of agonist muscle activation as measured by electromyography amplitude

    A measure of how quickly the nervous system activates the muscle

    Time frame: Baseline, minute 20

  5. Change in nervous system inhibition as measured by electromyographic waveform aplitude following motor cortex stimulation

    A measure of inhibition for the corticospinal tract

    Time frame: Baseline, minute 20

Other outcomes

  1. Self-reported ability to imagine movements as measured by Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised as measured on a scale from 8 to 56

    Survey that estimates one's capacity to imagine movement. A higher score indicates better imagination.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Level of vividness for imagining the imagined contractions as measured by 7-point likert scale as measured from 1 to 7

    A 7-point likert scale is used to to determine how vivid one's imagination was for the conditions. A higher score indicates greater difficulty imagining the movement.

    Time frame: 20 minutes after baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Kennesaw State University
    Kennesaw, Georgia 30144, United States
    • Garrett Hester, Ph.D. · Contact · ghester4@kennesaw.edu · 470-578-4267
    • Garrett Hester, Ph.D. · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Non-identifying IPD will be provided upon a reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06627491
Lead sponsor
Kennesaw State University
Responsible party
Garrett Hester (Associate Professor of Exercise Science, Kennesaw State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 4, 2024
Start date
Oct 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2024

Study contacts

Garrett Hester, Ph.D.
Contact
ghester4@kennesaw.edu
470-578-4267

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion