CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06626347TREAT-EDUpdated Jun 22, 2026

Telemedicine for Reach, Education, Access, and Treatment for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support

An interventional study of TREAT-ED Virtual Group Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 26 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-22.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 26 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Emerging adults with type 1 diabetes are a vulnerable population. While diabetes self-management and education is known to offer opportunities to develop self-management skills required to achieve and maintain short- and long-term diabetes outcomes, emerging adults are reported to have poor clinic attendance and in turn low participation in diabetes self-management education and support services. This pilot study aims to test a novel approach to diabetes self-management education and support that incorporates technological and applied learning-driven methods delivered through group telemedicine visits to improve emerging adults engagement in diabetes self-management education and support with the ultimate goal of improving diabetes outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Diabetes self-management education and support is considered a cornerstone of care and essential in helping people navigate self-management decisions and activities. Despite evidence that diabetes self-management education and support is a critical component of diabetes care, participation remains low. Emerging adulthood has been described as the distinct period between 18 and 25 years when adolescents work to achieve autonomy and explore life possibilities in moving toward adulthood. Suboptimal self-management has been identified as a major problem in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes, a particularly vulnerable group with an increased risk for poor diabetes-related outcomes. In its current form diabetes self-management education and support has been cited for not meeting the needs of emerging adults, when emerging adults have expressed interest in diabetes self-management education and support delivered with peer-supported, technological and applied learning-driven methods. To address these challenges, we are applying information gained from the literature and key stakeholder groups to our established Telemedicine for Reach, Education, Access and Treatment (TREAT) delivery model with a specific focus on diabetes self-management education and support. TREAT-ED (for self-management EDucation) will be designed to specifically engage emerging adults by integrating diabetes self-management education and support objectives to support informed decision making, self-care, and preparation for transfer to adult care, to improve outcomes. Diabetes care and education specialists will lead TREAT-ED with a cohort of emerging adults and will 1) help to organize and facilitate group sessions delivered through telehealth and 2) use continuous blood glucose monitoring reports as personalized examples to drive established diabetes self-management education and support content. With user-centered design techniques we developed and built and will now evaluate implementation determinants and test the TREAT-ED model. Feasibility assessment of the impact of the model on emerging adult patient participation in diabetes self-management education and support along with clinical, psychosocial and behavioral outcomes will be examined. We hypothesize that models that rely on current day strategies to engage emerging adults at high risk for diabetes-related problems with effective self-management skills will improve diabetes self-management education and support engagement and outcomes. If proven to be effective, this model is one that could be adapted for emerging adults who have transferred to adult diabetes care and other patient populations throughout the United States.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

Keywords

  • Type 1 Diabetes
  • Emerging Adults
  • Telemedicine
  • Health Care Delivery
  • Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support
  • Visit Attendance
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 577 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49 is above the median of 40 across 2,649 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 26 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (ICD10 E10.xx, O24.0x)
  • 18 to 26 years of age at time of study enrollment
  • Able to communicate via videoconferencing platform
  • Intending to maintain status as a patient at participating clinical sites throughout the study duration
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not have a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (ICD10 E10.xx, O24.0x)
  • Less than 18 or older than 26 years old at time of enrollment
  • Do not intend to maintain their care at participating clinical sites throughout the duration of the study
  • Are unable to communicate via telemedicine
  • Has other concerns that may interfere significantly with their ability to participate in the intervention (ongoing health issues, personal events, etc.)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TREAT-ED

    * Emerging adult patients with type 1 diabetes assigned to groups of eight participants on average. * Four diabetes self-management education and support group sessions delivered virtually each session lasting 30-45 minutes. * Group sessions scheduled at intervals decided up on by participants.

    Other: TREAT-ED Virtual Group Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support

Interventions

  • OtherTREAT-ED Virtual Group Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support

    TREAT-ED is an innovative group telehealth delivery model designed to engage emerging adults in DSMES services. TREAT-ED sessions are facilitated by a Diabetes Care and Education Specialist and include content centered around the ADCES7 Self-Care Behaviors and applied learning strategies, e.g., case scenarios integrating glucose monitoring, and group discussions to drive knowledge transfer and skill development for diabetes self-care behaviors within the context of issues that are salient to the target population.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of diabetes self-management education and support sessions attended

    Possible range is 0 to 4 sessions.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in empowerment at 6 months

    Empowerment will be assessed with the 8-item Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form. Individual items are scored from 1 to 5; total scores are the average of all individual items. Higher scores indicate a greater sense of empowerment.

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 6 months

  2. Change from baseline in readiness for transition at 6 months

    Transition readiness and self-management skill level will be assessed with the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire. Individual items are scored from 1 to 5; total scores are the average of all individual items. The higher the score, the greater the readiness for transition to adult care.

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 6 months

  3. Change from baseline in self-efficacy at 6 months

    Self-efficacy will be assessed using the 10-item Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Self-Management scale. Individuals items are scored from 1 to 10; total scores are the average of all individual items. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 6 months

  4. Change from baseline in diabetes distress at 6 months

    Diabetes distress will be assessed with the Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System: CORE SCALE. The CORE SCALE includes 8 items. Individual items are scored from 1 to 5; total scores are the average of all individual items. The higher the score, the greater the level of distress.

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 6 months

  5. Change in percentage of patients with glycemic control from baseline to 6 months.

    Glycemic control defined as clinically measured hemoglobin A1c value of 7% or less. Values will be identified through medical record review.

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 6 months

  6. Percentage of time in target glycemic range (70-180 mg/dL)

    Time in target glycemic range (70-180 mg/dL) is evaluated in 14 day periods using data recorded on continuous glucose monitoring systems and documented in the electronic health record system. This data will only be available for participants who use a continuous glucose monitor and provide data for documentation.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months

  7. Number of acute care visits

    Number of emergency room visits and hospital admissions related to type 1 diabetes; documented in the medical record system.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months

  8. Number of diabetes clinic visits attended

    Diabetes clinic visits with an endocrinologist are recommended to occur every three months or more frequently as needed at the participating institution and are documented in the medical record.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UPMC Childrens Hospital of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Mar 17, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified IPD that underlies results reported in publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06626347
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Ingrid Libman (Associate Professor of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 3, 2024
Start date
Nov 8, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2026
Completion
May 31, 2026
Last update
Jun 22, 2026

Study contacts

Ingrid Libman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh
Linda Siminerio, RN, PhD, CDCES
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion