CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06617845Updated Oct 14, 2025

Optimizing Brain Stimulation Parameters

An interventional study of Stimulation Set A and B in Epilepsy; Seizure, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-14.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2020, registered Sep 2024).
  • Started Oct 2020; still recruiting 5 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A primary purpose of this study is to better understand what stimulation parameters work best for patients. For example, for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus (ANT), it is not clear what stimulation frequency leads is most effective. This study will help assess the effectiveness of low frequency or high frequency stimulation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsy; Seizure

Browse trials for

03

In context

Epilepsy

1,805 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 417 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 50 across 1,206 interventional studies indexed under Epilepsy.

Browse Epilepsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who are implanted with a brain stimulation device targeting the anterior nucleus of the thalamus per Mayo Clinic standard of care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients for whom clinical follow-up is not expected during the initial 6-8 months following implant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stimulation set A/B group

    Device will be set to use stimulation parameters from set A first (e.g. 145 Hz) and then from set B (e.g. low frequency stimulation).

    Device: Stimulation Set A and B

  • Experimental
    Stimulation set B/A group

    Device will be set to use stimulation parameters from set B first (e.g. low frequency stimulation) and then from set A (e.g. 145 Hz).

    Device: Stimulation Set A and B

Interventions

  • DeviceStimulation Set A and B

    Subjects will receive one stimulation parameter set first for 3 months and then the other for three months. Sets will include Set A (145 Hz high frequency stimulation) and Set B (Low frequency stimulation less than 40 Hz, which is similar to stimulation frequencies used during cortical stimulation). The 145 Hz stimulation will be set to cycling (1 min on, 5 min off) while the low frequency setting will be continuous. Both sets include stimulation parameter sets that have been used in clinical practice as a part of standard of care. However, it is unclear which set is better or whether they are similarly effective.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Seizure burden

    Using the Mayo Epilepsy Short Assessment as well as patient diaries, seizure frequency is determined.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 7 months, 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Mayo Post-Stimulation Activation score

    The Mayo Post-Stimulation Activation questionnaire is a 9-item survey measuring post-stimulation symptoms such as speech problems, numbness, muscle tightness, balance, lightheadedness, vision, mood changes, and memory. The questionnaire is ranked on a Likert scale of 1 - Mild; 2 - Moderate; 3 - Severe; 4 - N/A. The minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 4, where 1 represents less severe.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 7 months, 12 months

  2. Change in Mayo Epilepsy Short Assessment (MESA) score

    The Mayo Epilepsy Short Assessment (MESA) is a questionnaire measuring seizure frequency, seizure severity, quality of life, sleep, and mood. Seizure frequency is measured by number of seizures per month. Severity, life satisfaction, and sleep quality are measured from 1 (worst) to 10 (best). Mood and anxiety are measured on a 4-point scale with the following options (Not at all, Several days, More than half the days, Nearly every day).

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 7 months, 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06617845
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Brian N. Lundstrom (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
Start date
Oct 20, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 14, 2025

Study contacts

Amy Headlee
Contact
headlee.amy@mayo.edu
507-538-4107
Karla Crockett
Contact
crockett.karla@mayo.edu
507-538-4880

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion