ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06615960PMSUpdated Sep 27, 2024

Safety and Effectiveness of PANAF-Premium TM Snake Venom Antiserum As Standard Treatment for Snakebites

An observational study in Snake Bites, sponsored by Premium Serums & Vaccines Pvt.Ltd.. Recruiting at 1 site in Cameroon. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-27.

Sponsored by Premium Serums & Vaccines Pvt.Ltd. · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2025, 1 year 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Aug 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
112
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Snakebite envenomation (SBE) is a major public health problem in many developing countries. Standard snake antivenom (SA) remains the primary treatment and has been shown to reduce mortality in observational studies conducted in several sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. Although it is relatively available in other endemic contexts such as Asia and Latin America, there have been major challenges with the reliable supply of effective products in sub-Saharan Africa for many years. Premium Serums \& Vaccines Pvt. Ltd. (PSVPL) recently introduced its SA brand, namely PANAF-Premium TM, manufactured to address unmet treatment needs in the local context. This serum has received WHO approval for use in sub-Saharan Africa and is used in Cameroon with neutralizing efficacy for 24 species represented in Africa.

This is an open-label, Phase IV post-marketing surveillance study to collect safety and effectiveness data systematically following the administration of PANAF-Premium TM. The study will describe the types, severity, and number of adverse events recorded following the administration of PANAF-Premium TM and its effectiveness for snakebite management. Epidemiological data will also be collected, along with information on the snake species typically responsible for bites in the North region of Cameroon, the type of envenomation, the total dose of SA required for reversal of envenomation, and the total time required for clinical recovery. This will complement the international and national pool of pharmacovigilance data.

Read the detailed description

Background: Snakebite envenomation (SBE) is a major public health problem in many developing countries. Conventional snake antivenom (SA) remains the primary treatment and has been shown to reduce mortality in observational studies conducted in several sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. Although it is relatively available in other endemic contexts such as Asia and Latin America, there have been major challenges with the reliable supply of effective products in sub-Saharan Africa for many years. Premium Serums \& Vaccines Pvt. Ltd. (PSVPL) recently introduced its SA brand, namely PANAF-Premium TM, manufactured to the latest standards, providing a solution to address unmet treatment needs in the local context. This serum has received WHO approval for use in sub-Saharan Africa and is used in Cameroon with neutralizing efficacy for 24 species represented in Africa. Since antivenom is of animal origin, it can cause adverse reactions ranging from mild itching to fatal anaphylaxis; therefore, patients should be treated appropriately or given prophylactic premedication. Approximately 20% of cases may develop early (within a few hours) or late (five days or more) allergic reactions after administration of snake antivenom. This open-label, Phase IV post-marketing surveillance study aims to collect safety and effectiveness data systematically following administration of PANAF-Premium TM. The study will describe the types, severity, and number of adverse events recorded following administration of PANAF-Premium TM and its effectiveness for snakebite management. Additionally, epidemiological data will be collected regarding the snake species typically responsible for bites in the North Cameroon region, the type of envenomation, the total dose of SA required for reversal of envenomation, and the total time required for clinical recovery. This will also contribute to the international and national pool of pharmacovigilance data.

Method: An open-label, Phase IV post-marketing surveillance trial will be conducted to describe the types, severity, and number of adverse events recorded during snakebite management. The average dose of SA used will be identified, and the duration of recovery, as well as the type of snakes prevalent in the area, will be explored. Eligible patients will be admitted to the hospital, and case management will be in accordance with the standard protocol followed in Cameroon and adapted from the guidelines of the African Society of Venomology. Any medication or procedure necessary to save the patient will be permitted. If antivenom serum is needed, the study drug to be used is PANAF-Premium TM (Snake Venom Antiserum-Pan Africa), manufactured by Premium Serums \& Vaccines Pvt. Ltd. Any suspicious or unexpected serious adverse events (SAEs) will be recorded immediately and reported to the sponsor/ethics committee for further action. There will be no restrictions on the use of any concomitant medication or other interventions or investigations mandated by the patient\'s clinical condition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Snake Bites

Browse trials for

03

In context

Snake Bites

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Snake Bites; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 112 is above the median of 99 across 19 observational studies indexed under Snake Bites.

Browse Snake Bites studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Premium Serums & Vaccines Pvt.Ltd. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will recruit participants with a history of snakebites or unknown bites showing signs of envenomation requiring Snake Antiserum. Participants will come from health districts in Mayo Oulo, Gashiga, Poli, and Garoua I, located in the North region of Cameroon. One facility in each district has been selected based on prior snakebite cases: Garoua Regional Hospital, Poli District Hospital, Mayo Oulo District Hospital, and Gashiga District Hospital. No specific gender ratio is required, as previous studies have shown no differences in treatment effectiveness or safety between genders.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients of both sex and of any age, with history of snakebites/unknown bites received in study sites

  • Willingness to participate in the study by signing the Form (ICF)
  • Presence of one or more signs of envenomation detected by clinical examination including positive clot test. Patient may present with one or more of following visible clinical signs and symptoms of snake envenomation being local or systemic -

Defining local and systemic envenomation

  1. Local envenomation- (I) Presence of bite marks with or without oozing of blood, blistering and change in color of skin.

    (ii) Rapidly progressive or massive swelling involving more than half of the bitten limb within few hours of bite (without tourniquet) (iii) Development of enlarged tender lymph nodes draining the bitten part within couple of hours after bite

  2. Systemic envenomation- (i) Neurotoxic syndrome- signs of neuro-paralysis like blurring of vision, double vision, difficulty in swallowing, sleepy feeling, drooping of head, slurring of speech and the voice may become indistinct with shallow breathing, ptosis, ataxia, respiratory paralysis and generalized flaccid paralysis.

(ii) Hemotoxic syndrome- spontaneous systemic bleeding, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and abdominal tenderness suggestive of gastro-intestinal or retro-peritoneal bleed and/or renal damage, coagulopathy detected by 20 min WBCT with or without external bleeding and shock and a clinical condition/envenomation serious enough to administer SA will be eligible for enrolment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants not able to give consent
  • Participants who are unable to understand the nature, scope, significance and consequences of this clinical trial
  • Pre-existing renal disease, uncontrolled chronic obstructive airway disease, congestive heart failure or previous myocardial infarction and consumption of diuretics, anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs have been causes for exclusion in a few earlier studies as these illnesses and medications could have altered the clinical and laboratory profile of patients with envenomation.
  • Known history of to the drug or to drugs with a similar chemical structure
  • Simultaneous participation in any clinical trial involving administration of an investigational medicinal product within 30 days prior to clinical trial beginning
  • Participants with a physical or psychiatric condition which at the investigator's discretion may put the subject at risk, may confound the trial results, or may interfere with the subject's participation in this clinical trial
  • Known or persistent abuse of medication, drugs or alcohol Others conditions may include evidence of neurological, cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease as far as can be assessed by history of participants, physical examination, and/or laboratory examinations.

NB: Patient previously sensitized with equine antiserum such as Tetanus or Diphtheria antitoxin or patients having received treatment with adrenaline, antihistamine, or as a part of treatment at primary health care center and pregnancy will not be excluded. Since this is a post-marketing study, these patients will be included, and this information will be factored in while collating and analyzing data.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
112 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety of Panaf Premuim

    Measured by the frequency and severity of the recorded Adverse events based on clinical evaluation using DAAD (Division of AIDS grading of AE) grading classification.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Safety of Panaf Premium

    Measured by the factors associated with the occurrence of adverse events, assessed through clinical evaluation and review of concomitant medication.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Effectiveness of Panaf Premium

    Measured by the number of days required to control toxicity, defined as the time in days to achieve reversal of a positive Whole Blood Clotting Test (WBCT) in cases of hemotoxic envenomation, and/or the time to reverse clinical signs and symptoms based on the African Society of Venimology's classification and grading of envenomation.

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Effectiveness of Panaf Premium

    Effectiveness will be measured by the average dose of snake antivenom administered and documented throughout the patient\'s follow-up, with complete recovery defined by the resolution of symptoms according to the African Society of Venimology\'s classification and grading system

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Identification of Snake Species Responsible for Envenomation

    This outcome will be assessed by identifying the snake species responsible for envenomation, based on the description provided by the patient, clinical evaluation, and, where available or laboratory analysis. The investigator will document the snake species involved using classification systems as per guidelines of the African Society of Venimology

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Snake bite epidemiology

    This outcome will be assessed by calculating the proportion of patients who present with envenomation, categorized by age, sex, and clinical syndrome (e.g., neurotoxic, hemotoxic, or cytotoxic). Data will be collected using patient demographic information, clinical assessments, and envenomation classification systems based on the African Society of Venimology guidelines.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Garoua Regional Hospital
    Garoua, North, Cameroon
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gutierrez JM, Calvete JJ, Habib AG, Harrison RA, Williams DJ, Warrell DA. Snakebite envenoming. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Sep 14;3:17063. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.63. Erratum In: Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Oct 05;3:17079. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.79. PubMed 28905944 ↗
  • Visser LE, Kyei-Faried S, Belcher DW. Protocol and monitoring to improve snake bite outcomes in rural Ghana. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004 May;98(5):278-83. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)00065-8. PubMed 15109550 ↗
  • Schiermeier Q. Africa braced for snakebite crisis. Nature. 2015 Sep 17;525(7569):299. doi: 10.1038/525299a. No abstract available. PubMed 26381961 ↗
  • Chippaux JP, Habib AG. Antivenom shortage is not circumstantial but structural. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Dec;109(12):747-8. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trv088. No abstract available. PubMed 26626337 ↗
  • Brown NI. Consequences of neglect: analysis of the sub-Saharan African snake antivenom market and the global context. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001670. Epub 2012 Jun 5. PubMed 22679521 ↗
  • Gutierrez JM. Global Availability of Antivenoms: The Relevance of Public Manufacturing Laboratories. Toxins (Basel). 2018 Dec 24;11(1):5. doi: 10.3390/toxins11010005. PubMed 30586868 ↗
  • Potet J, Smith J, McIver L. Reviewing evidence of the clinical effectiveness of commercially available antivenoms in sub-Saharan Africa identifies the need for a multi-centre, multi-antivenom clinical trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jun 24;13(6):e0007551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007551. eCollection 2019 Jun. PubMed 31233536 ↗
  • Habib AG, Warrell DA. Antivenom therapy of carpet viper (Echis ocellatus) envenoming: effectiveness and strategies for delivery in West Africa. Toxicon. 2013 Jul;69:82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Jan 20. PubMed 23339853 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — This has not yet been decided for the moment

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 27, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06615960
Lead sponsor
Premium Serums & Vaccines Pvt.Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 27, 2024
Start date
Aug 26, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 26, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 27, 2024

Study contacts

Tatiana Djikeussi
Contact
chokokamfile@gmail.com
+237655190562
Lorraine Guedem
Contact
neklorraine2@gmail.com
+237693374545
Khadillar
study director · Premuim serums

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion