ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06613295SABR-MESCCUpdated Sep 25, 2024

Separation Surgery Followed by Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) Versus SABR Alone for Spinal Metastases

An interventional study of SABR and Separation surgery in Solid Tumor, Spinal Neoplasms and Spinal Tumor, sponsored by Cancer Research Antwerp. Recruiting at 9 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-25.

Sponsored by Cancer Research Antwerp · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2025, 1 year 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2022, registered Feb 2024).
  • Started Mar 2022; still recruiting 4 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
128
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) compared to separation surgery followed by SABR in ambulatory patients with malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC).

The primary objective of the project is investigating the effect of SABR compared to separation surgery followed by SABR in ambulatory patients with MESCC on retaining ambulatory function. The primary endpoint of the study is ambulatory function 3 months post treatment defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid; being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, ...); not being able to walk. Secondary outcomes are local control, progression free survival, early and late adverse effects, quality of life, effect on pain and need for reintervention.

The aim is to randomise 128 patients 1:1 to either "separation surgery" followed by SABR (5x 8.0 Gy postoperative) (control arm) vs. SABR alone (5x 8.0 Gy) (study arm).

Patients will be evaluated at 3 and 6 months after treatment with MRI scan, quality of life questionnaires, anamnestic and clinical evaluation at clinical follow ups for assessment of ambulatory function, acute and late toxicity and need for reintervention. Moreover, at 6 weeks, 12 months and 24 months after treatment a teleconsult for assessment of ambulatory function, and need for reintervention will be performed.

Read the detailed description

In this study, patients with malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), Bilsky grade 1c, 2 and 3 who are ambulatory with or without aid (rollator, cane, one persons help) will be treated by separation surgery followed by SABR (5x 8.0 Gy postoperative) (control arm) or SABR alone (5x 8.0 Gy) (study arm). The primary objective of the study is investigating the effect of SABR compared to separation surgery followed by SABR in ambulatory patients with MESCC on retaining ambulatory function. The primary endpoint of the study is ambulatory function 3 months post treatment defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid; being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, ...); not being able to walk. Secondary outcomes are local control, progression free survival, early and late adverse effects, quality of life, effect on pain and need for reintervention.

For each participant, the study starts once written informed consent is provided and is composed by 4 study phases: a screening phase, randomisation, a treatment phase and a follow-up phase.

The screening phase will allow for assessment of subject eligibility before randomisation and treatment. Demographic data, disease and spinal metastases characteristics and previous anticancer therapies will be recorded. Once all screening procedures are completed, eligibility will be determined according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Randomisation will be performed in a 1:1 ratio to the control arm (separation surgery followed by SABR) and the study arm (SABR) using an electronic randomisation tool in the eCRF.

Treatment will be aimed to start as soon as possible, but certainly within 21 days after randomisation (surgery or upfront SABR). Surgical planning is done by the treating neurosurgeon in the participating center where the patient was included. Image-guided fractionated SABR using a SIB technique to the high-dose PTV will be delivered in 5 fractions of 8 Gy to a total of 40 Gy and to the conventional-dose PTV delivered simultaneously in 5 fractions of 4 Gy to a total of 20 Gy.

At 6 weeks (+/-1 week) after the last RT session following information will be obtained (preferentially by digital consult):

  1. Ambulatory status defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid, being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, ...), not being able to walk
  2. WHO performance status
  3. Acute and late toxicity assessment: as measured with CTCAE version 5.0
  4. Need for re-intervention, date and type of reintervention (surgery or radiotherapy), reason (wound infection, neurologic decline, loss of ability to walk or other)
  5. Pain response: VAS pain score
  6. Survival data (survival status, date of death, primary cause of death)

At 3 and 6 months (+/-3 weeks) after the last RT session following information will be obtained by physical or digital consult:

  1. Ambulatory status defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid, being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, ...), not being able to walk
  2. WHO performance status
  3. Concomitant medications and systemic anticancer therapies
  4. QoL according to the EORTC QLQ-C15 \& BM22 questionnaires
  5. Acute and late toxicity assessment: as measured with CTCAE version 5.0
  1. Need for re-intervention, date and type of reintervention (surgery or radiotherapy), reason (wound infection, neurologic decline, loss of ability to walk or other) 6. Pain response: VAS pain score 7. Physical examination: body weight 8. Local control 9. Survival data (survival status, date of death, primary cause of death)

At 12 and 24 months (+/-3 weeks) after the last RT session following information will be obtained (preferentially by digital consult):

  1. Ambulatory status defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid, being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, ...), not being able to walk
  2. Need for re-intervention, type of reintervention
  3. Survival data (survival status, date of death, primary cause of death)
  4. Local control (only if information is available in medical record as per standard of care)
02

Conditions studied

  • Solid Tumor
  • Spinal Neoplasms
  • Spinal Tumor
03

In context

Spinal Neoplasms

18 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Neoplasms; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 128 is above the median of 71 across 11 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Neoplasms.

Browse Spinal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Cancer Research Antwerp is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of a solid malignant tumour (preferentially proven;alternatively obtained by spinal surgical procedure)
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Histological, radiological or scintigraphical evidence of spinal (no limitation in the number of sites of metastases)
  • Spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) \<13 (i.e. no need for stabilisation of the spine) (see Appendix 6)
  • Spinal metastasis with MESCC: ESCC grade 1c, 2 and 3 (see Appendix 7)
  • Ambulatory: being able to walk 10m without aid or with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help).
  • estimated to be at least 3 months.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status of 0-2 (some help) (see Appendix 3)
  • Patient has given written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contra indication for MRI scan (e.g. pacemaker)
  • Previous RT or surgery at the level of the affected vertebrae
  • Non-solid primary tumours (e.g. lymphoma, multiple myeloma, germ cell tumours)
  • Non ambulatory at presentation
  • More than 3 affected vertebrae in one target site
  • More than 2 treatment sites
  • SINS ≥ 13 (unstable spine)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
128 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Separation surgery followed by stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy

    Surgery will take place within 21 days after randomisation. Surgical planning is done by the treating neurosurgeon in the participating center where the patient was included. The goal of separation surgery for intraspinal MESCC is to remove intraspinal epidural disease to allow a margin between the spinal cord (or cauda equina) and the treated radiotherapy volume, and to provide histological diagnosis or confirmation of the metastasis. The decompression should be as minimal invasive as possible, i.e. only intraspinal tumour tissue should be removed, while preserving as much as possible all of surrounding spinal structures. Separation surgery must be followed by SABR after minimum 2 and maximum 4 weeks postoperatively. Image-guided fractionated SABR using a SIB technique to the high-dose PTV will be delivered in 5 fractions of 8 Gy to a total of 40 Gy and to the conventional-dose PTV delivered simultaneously in 5 fractions of 4 Gy to a total of 20 Gy.

    Radiation: SABR · Procedure: Separation surgery

  • Experimental
    Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy

    SABR will start within 21 days of randomisation. Image-guided fractionated SABR using a SIB technique to the high-dose PTV will be delivered in 5 fractions of 8 Gy to a total of 40 Gy and to the conventional-dose PTV delivered simultaneously in 5 fractions of 4 Gy to a total of 20 Gy.

    Radiation: SABR

Interventions

  • RadiationSABR

    SABR

  • ProcedureSeparation surgery

    Separation surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of ambulant patients at 3 months

    The ambulatory status is scored binary (without or with aid vs not being able to walk)

    Time frame: 3 Months post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Local recurrence rate

    Time between date of study registration and date of local recurrence

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post treatment

  2. Time to loss of ambulation

    Time between date of study registration and date of loss of ambulation (in days)

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post treatment

  3. Progression free survival (PFS)

    Time between date of study registration and date of local recurrence

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post treatment

  4. Overall survival

    Time between date of study registration and date of death of any cause or last follow-up

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post treatment

  5. Number of patients with re-intervention and time to re-intervention (surgery, RT, …)

    Time between date of treatment and date of re-intervention

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post treatment

  6. Acute and late toxicity

    Incidence of Adverse Events as assessed by the CTCAE version 5.0

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post treatment

  7. Quality of life measurement by QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaires

    Difference in QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C15-PAL scale scores

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post treatment

  8. Pain response (VAS score)

    Improvement by ≥ 2 points on the pain (VAS score) at the treatment site

    Time frame: Up to 6 months post treatment

07

Study locations

3 of 9 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2025, 35 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2024
First posted
Sep 25, 2024
StartActual
Mar 7, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Mar 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2027
Last update
Sep 25, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06613295
Lead sponsor
Cancer Research Antwerp
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2024
Start date
Mar 7, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2024

Study contacts

Charlotte Billiet, MD, PhD
Contact
gza.cancertrials@zas.be
03234433759
Charlotte Billiet, MD, PhD
principal investigator · ZAS Augustinus

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion