An interventional study of PNF stretching and Static stretching group in Cerebral Palsy, sponsored by Gazi University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 6 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-20.
Sponsored by Gazi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and static stretching techniques on the balance and functional capabilities of children diagnosed with diplegic cerebral palsy (CP).
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and static stretching techniques on the balance and functional capabilities of children diagnosed with diplegic cerebral palsy (CP). The study consisted of a group of sixteen children, ranging in age from 8 to 16 years, who were diagnosed with bilateral hip flexor contracture and diplegic cerebral palsy. These children were classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I to III. The children were randomly divided into PNF and static stretching groups. Stretching techniques were applied 2 days a week for 4 weeks, with 6 repetitions in each session. The study assessed various parameters, including hip extension range of motion (ROM), muscle tone intensity based on the Modified Ashworth Scale, hip flexor shortness as determined by the Thomas Test, the time up and go (TUG) test, balance using the Pediatric Berg Balance Scale, and functional status evaluated through the Gilette Functional Walking Assessment Questionnaire.
1,891 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 439 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 34 is close to the median of 34 across 1,396 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.
Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →Gazi University is the lead sponsor of 548 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
PNF and static stretching methods were applied 2 days a week and 6 repetitions in each session for 4 weeks to the hip flexors. In addition to stretching, both of the groups received a routine treatment program consisting of gluteus maximus and quadriceps strengthening, balance, and walking exercises.
Other: PNF stretching
PNF and static stretching methods were applied 2 days a week and 6 repetitions in each session for 4 weeks to the hip flexors. In addition to stretching, both of the groups received a routine treatment program consisting of gluteus maximus and quadriceps strengthening, balance, and walking exercises.
Other: Static stretching group
Subjects lay supine on a treatment table, holding one knee to the chest and letting the other leg extend freely toward the floor at the end of the table. This protocol was adapted from previous studies. The hip joint was carefully and gradually lowered towards the floor, with the knee flexing at a 90-degree angle until the individual experienced a mild stretching sensation (Visual analog scale:4-6). Then, the subject performed a sub-maximal voluntary isometric contraction by utilizing the flexor muscles for 20 seconds while resisting the applied force exerted by an examiner through the utilization of a hand-held dynamometer (K-Force Muscle Control). The examiner proceeded to passively manipulate the leg to achieve the desired range of motion (ROM), maintaining it for 20 seconds. This process was repeated six times for each limb. The patient rested for 2 minutes before applying the same technique to the other side.
While the patient was lying supine, the hip and knee joints on the non-stretch side were kept in 90⸰ flexion. A sandbag was positioned on the side to be stretched, specifically proximal to the patella, in order to induce a moderate sensation of stretching in the patient. Subsequently, a force was exerted in the direction of hip extension for a duration of 30 seconds. Afterward, the patient was instructed to relax. This process was repeated a total of six times, with a designated 20-second rest period between each repetition. The patient took a two-minute rest before the same technique was applied to the other side. There was no specific order on which side to apply the technique.
Hip extension Range of motion in degrees
Hip extension ROM was measured with a digital goniometer while the patient was lying in the prone position, and the knee was flexed.
Time frame: 3 months
Thomas test
The degree of hip flexion contracture was determined using the Thomas test while the patient was supine. The opposite hip was passively moved in the flexion direction as much as possible by a second physiotherapist. In the meantime, the degree of hip flexion on the designated side was assessed using a digital goniometer and documented in degrees. This test was repeated 3 times, and the results were averaged.
Time frame: 3 months
Timed Up and Go test (TUG)
Functional status was assessed by the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). The time required for the patient to get up from the chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down was calculated in seconds. The test was repeated 3 times, and the data average was recorded.
Time frame: 3 months
The Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (PBBS)
The Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (PBBS) was used to evaluate dynamic balance skills in children with CP. The scale comprises 14 items including sitting balance,standing balance, sitting to standing/standing to sitting, transfers, stepping, reaching forward with outstretched arm, reaching the foor, turning, and placing foot on stool items. Each item ranked from 0 to 4. 0 shows inability to perform the instruction, while 4 shows the ability to perform without any difculty. Maximum total score is 56.
Time frame: 3 months
Gilette Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ)
Gillette Functional AssessmentQuestionnaire (FAQ) 22-item asks the respondent to 'Please ratehow easy it is for the patient to do the following activities'followed by brief descriptions of 22 locomotor skills the five-level (minumum:1, maximum:5) Likert response scale used for the 22 skill items was 'easy', 'a little hard', 'very hard', 'can't do at all',and 'too young for activity'.
Time frame: 3 months
Age in years
Age of patients will be recorded
Time frame: 3 months
Weight in kilograms
Weights of patients will be recorded
Time frame: 3 months
Height in meters
Heights of patients will be recorded
Time frame: 3 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Sep 2024 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 3 months.
Of 882 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cerebral Palsy, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31. This study's 3 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 900 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.