An interventional study of The Difference Between The AI Model and Dentists Group and Deep Learning Models in Dental Plaque (Diagnosis) and Deep Learning, sponsored by Ankara Medipol University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 8 Years to 13 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.
Sponsored by Ankara Medipol University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Background: Dental plaque contributes to a number of common oral conditions such as caries, gingivitis, and periodontitis. As a result, detection and management of plaque is of great importance for the oral health of individuals. The primary objectives of this study were to design a deep learning model for the detection and segmentation of plaque in young permanent teeth and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the model. Methods: The dataset contains 506 dental images from 31 patients aged 8 to 13 years. Six state-of-the-art models were trained and tested using this dataset. The U-Net Transformer model was compared with three dentists for clinical applicability using 35 randomly selected images from the test set.
Dental plaque is defined as a microbial community embedded in a matrix composed of polymers derived from bacteria and the content of saliva that develops on the surface of the teeth. Microbial dental plaque is adsorbed onto the tooth surface within seconds after dental cleaning and persists functionally. These molecules primarily exist in the fluid of the subgingival sulcus, along with saliva, and demonstrate settlement in this area. The primary etiological factor for gingivitis and periodontitis is bacterial plaque, which can lead to the destruction of gingival tissues and periodontal attachment. In children, if oral hygiene is not established immediately after tooth eruption, and regular brushing habits are not instilled, the bacterial biofilm layer can settle on the tooth surfaces and gingival margins associated with the oral environment, initiating gingival inflammation.
The early detection and treatment of periodontal diseases at the initial stages in children are clinically important, as these conditions can intensify and lead to adverse outcomes in later periods. Bacterial plaque is the primary etiological factor for gingival diseases in children. Identifying and distinguishing microbial dental plaque by patients can be challenging. Plaques can be detected through routine clinical practice using periodontal probes and/or plaque-disclosing solutions. Although these methods are widely employed, they may yield subjective results. However, these assessment methods can be cumbersome, time-consuming, and unsuccessful in noncooperative children. Additionally, plaque-disclosing solutions used for microbial dental plaque detection may temporarily stain the oral mucosa and lips. The literature also includes digital imaging analyses such as laser-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy and HIS color space for the detection of microbial dental plaque. However, the drawbacks, such as the high cost of equipment and technical standardization, limit their use .
For these reasons, this study aims to develop an affordable and easily accessible artificial intelligence (AI) model for the early and accurate diagnosis of microbial dental plaque in children. The aim is to prevent various periodontal problems and provide motivation for oral hygiene by evaluating the diagnostic and detection performance of this AI model.
With advancements in artificial intelligence for image processing, research on detecting, segmenting, and quantifying dental plaque in images captured by dental cameras has significantly increased. One study attempted to detect dental plaque using an Enhanced K-Means machine learning algorithm. Additionally, a Mask R-CNN-based dental health Internet of Things (IoT) platform was developed to classify seven different oral diseases, including dental plaque, with a perfect accuracy rate for plaque recognition, although not for segmentation.
While the U-Net model is widely regarded as successful and mainstream in the domain of biomedical image processing, there are no studies in the literature on the analysis of dental plaque with U-Net and its variants. Additionally, no studies have been encountered regarding the analysis of dental plaque in young permanent teeth of children. Hence, this study endeavors to train six state-of-the-art artificial intelligence models, incorporating variations of the U-Net model, for the purpose of dental plaque prediction in young permanent teeth of children. Subsequently, their performances are meticulously summarized and presented for comprehensive analysis. Finally, to validate the clinical feasibility of the best performing model, statistical hypothesis tests are performed that compares the predictions of the AI model with the assessments from three dentists.
322 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Plaque; 54 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 59 across 286 interventional studies indexed under Dental Plaque.
Browse Dental Plaque studies →Ankara Medipol University is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
As artificial intelligence models, DeepLabV3+, Mask R-CNN (Detectron2), YOLOv8, U-Net, Super Vision U-net and U-Net Transformer models, which are state-of-the-art in semantic segmentation, were selected.
Diagnostic Test: Deep Learning Models
Using the prior knowledge (α = 0.05, β = 0.2) and an effect size of 0.61, the actual power of the comparison between the AI model (U-Net Transformer) and dentists on 34 test images is at least 80%, which is deemed sufficient. Therefore, randomly selected 35 images on the test dataset were labeled by three dentists without seeing the ground truth and were predicted by the AI model. Then, the intersection over union (IoU) score of these labeled and predicted images were calculated. The IoU score, which computes the ratio between the intersection and the union of two sets, is commonly used to evaluate the accuracy of prediction on semantic segmentation. To confirm clinical feasibility, three t-tests, which evaluates the difference between the means of two variables, were applied to IoU scores of dentists and IoU scores of the AI model and a p value \< .05 was considered statistically significant.
Diagnostic Test: The Difference Between The AI Model and Dentists Group
The clinical feasibility of the best performing model, statistical hypothesis tests are performed that compares the predictions of the AI model with the assessments from three dentists.
Also known as: The AI Model and Dentists Group
DeepLabV3+, Mask R-CNN (Detectron2), YOLOv8, U-Net, Super Vision U-net and U-Net Transformer were trained on 354 images and tested on 79 images.
Also known as: The Architecture of Deep Learning Models
Determination of IoU and Dice Coefficient values among six state-of-the-AI models
The IoU score, which computes the ratio between the intersection and the union of two sets, is commonly used to evaluate the accuracy of prediction on semantic segmentation. DeepLabV3+, Mask R-CNN (Detectron2), YOLOv8, U-Net, Super Vision U-net and U-Net Transformer were trained on 354 images and tested on 79 images. IoU and Dice Coefficient values were established among six state-of-the-AI models. As the IoU score increases, the prediction score increases. As the score increases, it becomes more distinctive in determining the model that gives results closest to the correct result.
Time frame: two weeks
Prediction scores of the dentists and U-Net Transformer on 35 test images
The prediction scores of the three dentists and the AI model (U-Net Transformer) on 35 test images
Time frame: two weeks
T-test results comparing the AI model and the three dentists
T-test results comparing AI model and three dentists Comparison of prediction scores of three dentists and AI model (U-Net Transformer) on 35 test images. AI model recorded IoU scores on 35 test images according to three dentists. AI model was compared with dentists on Recall, Dice Coefficient, IoU scores and Precision score. These scores were used to distinguish between false positive and true positive. In other words, although there is no plaque on teeth, does AI act as if there is plaque on teeth or does it show the real correct result?
Time frame: two weeks
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Ankara Medipol University