CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06598059DEE-REXUpdated Mar 2, 2026

Safety and Efficacy of a Drug Eluting Slim Modiolar Electrode Array

An interventional study of Cochlear implant and Dexamethasone in Hearing Loss, sponsored by Cochlear. Active, not recruiting at 11 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-02.

Sponsored by Cochlear · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical study will test a new type of cochlear implant known as CI632D. This experimental cochlear implant has been designed to slowly release a drug called dexamethasone. Dexamethasone works to ease inflammation and reduce tissue injury, which is common after any type of surgery. The goal is to learn if the dexamethasone in the CI632D implant lessens these reactions inside the ear following surgery and if this makes the implant work as well, or even better, in improving hearing than what would be expected with a standard cochlear implant. The study will be conducted in adults with sensorineural hearing loss, a type of hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or auditory nerve (the nerve that carries sound signals from the ear to the brain). The study participants will receive the CI632D experimental implant and will complete tests to see how well they are hearing and how well the implant is working.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hearing Loss

Keywords

  • cochlear implant
  • dexamethasone
  • fibrosis
03

In context

Hearing Loss

1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is above the median of 40 across 764 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss.

Browse Hearing Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

Cochlear is the lead sponsor of 91 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (94%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older, at time of consent.
  • Postlinguistic moderately severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, defined by a four frequency (500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz) pure-tone average unaided threshold (PTA4) ≥ 60 decibels hearing level (dB HL), in the ear to be implanted (For this study, moderately severe is defined by a four-frequency, pure-tone average threshold (PTA4) over the range 500 through 4000 Hz of more than 55 dB HL through 70 dB HL, inclusive. Profound is defined by a PTA4 of more than 90 dB HL).
  • Pure-tone average unaided threshold (500 through 4000 Hz) ≥ 30 dB HL, in the contralateral ear.
  • Preoperative aided word score ≤ 40% correct in the ear to be implanted.
  • Evidence of pneumococcal vaccination (e.g., Pneumovax) according to local guidelines.
  • Candidate is proficient in the language used to assess speech perception performance.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intra-axial (within the brain) lesions or deafness due to lesions of the acoustic nerve affecting the ear to be implanted.
  • Middle ear infection (including acute otitis media, chronic otitis media, suppurative otitis media, or serous drainage) in the ear to be implanted either at the time of surgery or within 3 months prior to enrolment.
  • Active autoimmune disease or active immunosuppressive therapy.
  • Presence of a tympanic membrane perforation or a history of otologic surgery within 3 months prior to enrolment, in the ear to be implanted.
  • Previously reported diagnosis of auditory neuropathy, in the ear to be implanted.
  • Previously reported diagnosis, in the ear to be implanted, of Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome (LVAS), Meniere's disease, or cochlear hydrops.
  • Ossification, otosclerosis, malformation or any other cochlear anomaly, such as common cavity, that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array, in the ear to be implanted.
  • Current cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts or drains, existing perilymph fistula, skull fracture or CSF leaks.
  • Previously reported diagnosis of bacterial meningitis.
  • Known allergic reaction or contraindication to dexamethasone or corticosteroids.
  • Severe, or poorer, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss prior to 5 years of age, as reported by the subject. (For this study, severe is defined by a PTA4 of more than 70 dB HL through 90 dB HL, inclusive).
  • Severe, or poorer, sensorineural hearing loss for more than 20 years, as reported by the subject, in the ear to be implanted.
  • Prior cochlear implantation in either ear.
  • Medical plan for cochlear implantation during the clinical investigation, contralateral to the ear to be implanted.
  • Medical or psychological conditions that contraindicate general anaesthesia, surgery, or participation in the clinical investigation as determined by the Investigator.
  • Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations inherent to the surgical procedure(s) and prosthetic devices, as determined by the Investigator.
  • Women who are pregnant.
  • Additional disabilities that may affect the subject's participation or safety during the clinical investigation.
  • Unable or unwilling to comply with all the requirements of the clinical investigation as determined by the investigator.
  • Investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families. Immediate family is defined as spouse, parent, child, or sibling.
  • Cochlear employees or employees of Contract Research Organisations or contractors engaged by Cochlear for the purposes of this investigation.
  • Current participation, or participation in another interventional clinical study/trial in the past 30 days, involving an investigational drug or device unless Cochlear sponsored and determined by Investigator or Sponsor to not impact this investigation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Drug-eluting electrode array (CI632D)

    Participants will be implanted with the slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array.

    Device: Cochlear implant · Drug: Dexamethasone

Interventions

  • DeviceCochlear implant

    CI632D cochlear implant

    Also known as: CI632D, Slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array

  • DrugDexamethasone

    CI632D, dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implant

    Also known as: CI632D, Slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Coprimary endpoint 1: Mean monopolar 1 plus 2 (MP1+2) impedances (kOhms) at 3 months postactivation

    Impedance will be measured across the active electrodes of the implant for each participant.

    Time frame: On day of implantation and at 1- and 3-months postactivation

  2. Coprimary endpoint 2: Mean change in word recognition score in the best unilateral listening mode in quiet from preimplantation to 3 months postactivation

    Within-subject change in consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet (% correct) calculated as the average across 2 runs of the test conducted on each participant. CNC word score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 3-months postactivation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean within-subject change in the global score of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of hearing scale (SSQ12) from preimplantation to postimplantation

    Within-subject change in Global SSQ12 scores at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. The global SSQ12 score ranges from 0-10, higher the score the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation

  2. Mean within-subject change in sentence recognition score in the best unilateral listening mode in noise from preimplantation to postimplantation

    Within-subject change in AzBio sentence in noise score at a +10 dB Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. AzBio score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation

  3. Mean within-subject change in sentence recognition score in the best bilateral listening mode in noise from preimplantation to postimplantation

    Within-subject change in AzBio sentence in noise score at a +10 dB Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. AzBio score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation

Other outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants who experience an adverse event and the proportion of participants who experience a device deficiency throughout the study

    Adverse events will be recorded as overall, by severity, by relatedness to device or procedure, or by seriousness. Device deficiency will be recorded as overall and by type.

    Time frame: From implantation to 12-months postimplantation (study end)

07

Study locations

11 sites
  • UCLA Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Rocky Mountain Ear Center
    Englewood, Colorado 80113, United States
  • University of Iowa
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • Henry Ford Health
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Washington University
    St Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
    New York, New York 10010, United States
  • NYU Langone Health
    New York, New York 10017, United States
  • Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center
    New York, New York 11042, United States
  • University Hospitals
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06598059
Lead sponsor
Cochlear
Collaborators
University of Iowa, LWB Consulting, Althea Anagnostopoulos Harrington, MV Clinical Research, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Jan 3, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2026
Completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 2, 2026

Study contacts

Aaron Parkinson, PhD
study director · Cochlear

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion