ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06582550Updated Sep 3, 2024

Effectiveness of Audiovisual Versus Written Postoperative Instructions for Patients Undergoing Minor Hand Procedures

An interventional study of Minor Hand Procedure in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Hand Cyst Ganglion and Trigger Finger, sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-03.

Sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The utility and effectiveness of video-based instructions (VBI) versus standard written instructions was not previously investigated in hand surgery; thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of audiovisual instruction as compared to regular verbal instructions given to patients undergoing common hand procedures, including instruction recall and compliance, patient education, patient satisfaction with the information given, patient satisfaction with operative experience.

Read the detailed description

Outcomes of hand surgery are greatly dependent on factors outside the operating theater as well. These include patient compliance to preoperative instructions that consist of proper surgical site care, proper positioning, and following occupational therapy protocols. Previous studies have shown that video-based information provide greater patient satisfaction than verbal instructions. Visual information was also reported to decrease patient anxiety regarding the procedure and increases patient education in terms of procedure risks and benefits(1-5). The utility and effectiveness of video-based instructions (VBI) versus standard written instructions was not previously investigated in hand surgery; thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of audiovisual instruction as compared to regular verbal instructions given to patients undergoing common hand procedures, including instruction recall and compliance, patient education, patient satisfaction with the information given, patient satisfaction with operative experience. The secondary objective is to evaluate if VBI result in better outcomes than standard written instructions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  • Hand Cyst Ganglion
  • Trigger Finger
03

In context

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

587 studies on the registry are indexed under Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; 134 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 60 across 443 interventional studies indexed under Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Browse Carpal Tunnel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre is the lead sponsor of 421 studies on the registry; 105 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Please ensure that ALL items below are satisfied to be included in the study.

  • Patient undergoing hand and/or upper extremity surgery with Dr. Thibaudeau
  • Patient ≥ 18 years old
  • Patient who comprehends instructions provided in English and/or French
  • Patient who can navigate the internet to complete an online post-operative questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Please ensure that NONE of the following items are selected to be included in the study.

  • Patient presenting with intra-articular, open, or pathological fractures
  • Patient presenting with associated tendon or nerve injuries
  • Patient receiving definitive surgery ≥21 days after injury
  • Patient with previous surgeries/deformity in the hand
  • Patient with pre-existing severe joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis, finger joint stiffness, or non-union)
  • Patient with medical to surgery
  • Patient who is unable to comply with rehabilitation
  • Patient who is unwilling to be followed up
  • Patient with dementia
  • Patient with significant mental illness
  • Patient who is unable to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Audiovisual Instruction Group

    Patients who require a hand surgery presenting to the clinic will be divided randomly; each participant is assigned by opening a prepared envelope with a dedicated group randomly, if the patient is assigned to group 1, they will receive standard printed instructions regarding their expected postoperative care, but if the patient is assigned to group 2, they will be provided with a barcode to scan to view audiovisual instructions regarding their post-operative course

    Procedure: Minor Hand Procedure

  • Active comparator
    Written Instruction Group

    Patients who require a hand surgery presenting to the clinic will be divided randomly; each participant is assigned by opening a prepared envelope with a dedicated group randomly, if the patient is assigned to group 1, they will receive standard printed instructions regarding their expected postoperative care, but if the patient is assigned to group 2, they will be provided with a barcode to scan to view audiovisual instructions regarding their post-operative course

    Procedure: Minor Hand Procedure

Interventions

  • ProcedureMinor Hand Procedure

    Unilateral minor hand procedure (carpal tunnel release, trigger finger A1 pulley release, lesion excision)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. patient satisfaction with the operative experience

    Questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with the operative experience will be distributed within a week in post operative visit

    Time frame: within 1 week

  2. patient instruction recall

    Questionnaire to assess patient instruction recall will be distributed within a week in post operative visit. It consists of 9 questions, the maximum score is 9 and indicates excellent recall.

    Time frame: within 1 week

  3. patient satisfaction with the information given

    Questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with the information givenwill be distributed within a week in post operative visit Overall, are you satisfied with the provided post-operative instructions for your hand surgery? Likert-scale 1-10 (with smile face) Overall, were the provided post-operative instructions for your hand surgery easy to understand? Likert-scale 1-10 (with smile face) Overall, did the provided post-operative instructions for your hand surgery had the appropriate amount of information? Likert-scale 1-10 (with smile face)

    Time frame: within 1 week

  4. patient compliance

    Questionnaire to assess patient instruction compliance will be distributed within a week in post operative visit. It consists of 13 questions, each with a score, with 13 being thre maximum patient compliance.

    Time frame: within 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nursing staff patient experience

    Nursing staff will be asked to present which patients reached out to clinic number/email with questions and if the instrutions decreased the incidence of such Assessed as binomial outcome Have you called your surgeon's office post-operatively regarding any unexpected post-operative course? Yes No Unsure

    Time frame: within 3 months

  2. Dash Scores

    Questionnaire to assess patient outcome will be distributed within a week in post operative visit Quick dash score QuickDASH DISABILITY/SYMPTOM SCORE= (sum of n responses) - 1 x 25, wherenis equal to the number of completed responses.

    Time frame: within 1 week

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06582550
Responsible party
Stephanie Thibaudeau (Assistant Professor of Plastic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 3, 2024
Start date
Sep 19, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 19, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 3, 2024

Study contacts

Rawan ElAbd, MD MSc
Contact
plastic.surgery@muhc.mcgill.ca
514-934-8025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion