ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06578026Updated Aug 29, 2024

Developing Resilience Skills and Social Competence in Youth in a School Setting

An interventional study of Resilience Builder Program in Psychosocial Functioning, sponsored by The Catholic University of America. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 9 Years to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-29.

Sponsored by The Catholic University of America · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2016, registered Aug 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
169
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
9 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Our study aimed to answer the question: Can a resilience-based intervention improve the psychosocial and educational outcomes of students with psychosocial difficulties? We examined the effectiveness of a resilience-based group intervention, the Resilience Builder Program® (RBP), with students in low-SES school settings to determine if this treatment improves psychosocial and educational outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Enhancing resilience is valuable to youth from economically marginalized communities given that they often face greater challenges and hardships than their peers from more affluent communities.

Efforts to increase resilience skills in these youth are hampered because they disproportionately encounter barriers in access to mental health interventions. Implementing school-based services may be optimal to address these inequalities. This project explores the effectiveness of a school-based group intervention (the Resilience Builder Program®) related to resilience and academic functioning in a sample of children from economically marginalized communities. Students (N = 169) with social-emotional difficulties were recruited from five elementary schools and randomly assigned to participate in the Resilience Builder Program® (RBP) immediately or following a semester delay. Participants, their parents, and teachers completed measures of resilience and academic functioning. Repeated-measures analysis of variance compares groups across time (pre-, post-intervention) on psychosocial and academic outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psychosocial Functioning

Keywords

  • resilience
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The Catholic University of America is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • psychosocial deficits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • psychosis
  • extreme aggression
  • autism
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
169 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Received the Resilience Builder Program intervention

    Behavioral: Resilience Builder Program

  • No intervention
    Control

    Did not receive the Resilience Builder Program

Interventions

  • BehavioralResilience Builder Program

    The Resilience Builder Program® group therapy will meet for one class period once a week during the semester (12 sessions). The group aims to improve resilience skills: areas such as the ability to control emotions and behavior, social skills and interactions with peers, problem-solving skills, ability to be flexible in different situations, self-esteem, and optimistic thinking. The groups involve the group leader presenting a new topic and skill, the students discussing this topic and developing strategies associated with the skill, the students practicing the skill while getting feedback from the group leader, and a period focused on self-control strategies. A letter reviewing each session will be sent home to the parent/guardian each week. Also, each child will be asked to do an assignment between weekly sessions to help him/her practice new skills.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Resiliency scales for children and adolescent (RSCA)

    self-report of child's resilience; score 0-100; higher scores = stronger resilience

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Behavior assessment system for children, 2nd edition (BASC)

    parent, child, and teacher report across varied psychosocial subscales; score 0-100; scores vary based on subscale, higher scores can indicate greater impairment or better functioning

    Time frame: 1 month

Other outcomes

  1. Academic competence evaluation scales (ACES)

    teacher report of student's academic engagement and motivation; score 0-100; higher scores = better functioning

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Montgomery County Public Schools
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No plans to share with other researchers

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2016 to primary completion in Mar 2020, 44 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 24, 2024
First posted
Aug 29, 2024
StartActual
Jun 16, 2016
Primary completionActual
Mar 13, 2020
CompletionActual
Mar 13, 2020
Last update
Aug 29, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06578026
Lead sponsor
The Catholic University of America
Responsible party
Brendan Rich (Associate Professor, The Catholic University of America) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 29, 2024
Start date
Jun 16, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 13, 2020
Completion
Mar 13, 2020
Last update
Aug 29, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion