ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06572358Updated Mar 3, 2025

A Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of Test Product in Healthy Adult Human Subjects Having Symptoms of Gut Dysbiosis (Heart Burn, Bloating, Constipation and Gut Immunity).

An interventional study of MetProUltima in Gut Dysbiosis, sponsored by NovoBliss Research Pvt Ltd. Completed at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-03.

Sponsored by NovoBliss Research Pvt Ltd · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is prospective, open-label, single-arm, proof of science, clinical safety and efficacy study of MetProUltima in healthy adult human subjects having symptoms of Gut Dysbiosis (heart burn, bloating, constipation).

Read the detailed description

A total of up to 14 subjects will be enrolled to get 12 evaluable subjects complete the study.

The potential subjects will be screened as per the inclusion \& exclusion criteria only after obtaining written informed consent from the subjects. Subjects having symptoms of gut dysbiosis like burning sensation, bloating nausea and altered bowel habit, digestion issues, aching joints and high tendency of falling sick, chronic fatigue, constipation, diarrhoea will be enrolled in the study. The subjects will be instructed to visit the facility as per the below visits.

Visit 01 (Day -01): Screening, Blood Sample Collection Visit 02 (Day 01): Enrolment, Faecal Sample Collection, Test Product Dispensing Visit 03 (Day 45 ±2 Days): Treatment usage period, Evaluations Visit 04 (Day 90 ±2 Days): Treatment usage period, Evaluations and End of study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gut Dysbiosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dysbiosis

188 studies on the registry are indexed under Dysbiosis; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 60 across 132 interventional studies indexed under Dysbiosis.

Browse Dysbiosis studies →

Lead sponsor

NovoBliss Research Pvt Ltd is the lead sponsor of 47 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age: 18 to 65 years (both inclusive) at the time of consent.
  2. Sex: Healthy males and healthy non-pregnant/non-lactating females.
  3. Females of must have a self-reported negative pregnancy test.
  4. Subject should have refrigerator at their home for storage of test product.
  5. Subjects having history of falling sick frequently in two months.
  6. Subjects having gut dysbiosis with either of these three symptoms which includes burning sensation, bloating, nausea, altered bowel habit, digestion issues, aching joints and high tendency of falling sick, chronic fatigue, constipation, diarrhoea etc.
  7. If the subject is of childbearing potential, is practicing and agrees to maintain an established method of (IUD, hormonal implant device/injection, regular use of birth control pills or patch, diaphragm, condoms with spermicide or sponge with spermicidal jelly, cream or foam, partner vasectomy or abstinence).
  8. Subjects are willing to give written and are willing to come for regular follow-up.
  9. Subjects who commit not to use other probiotics, symbiotic, prebiotics, medicated treatments or food having high probiotics other than the test product for the entire duration of the study.
  10. Subject who has not participated in a similar investigation in the past three months.
  11. Willing to use test product throughout the study period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject with suspected or proved organic causes of constipation, such as Hirschsprung's disease, hypothyroidism, or structural anomalies of the anal canal.
  2. Subject with present condition of allergic response to any probiotic product.
  3. Subjects under chronic medication (e.g. aspirin-based products, anti-inflammatories, anti-histamines, corticotherapy etc.) that might influence the outcome of the study.
  4. Subjects with any major diseases of the cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary or endocrine systems.
  5. History of alcohol or drug addiction.
  6. Subjects with a history of major gastrointestinal complications (i.e. Crohn's disease, ulcer, cancer, ulcerative colitis).
  7. Subjects who have self-reported immuno-compromised ( positive, on anti-rejection medication, rheumatoid arthritis).
  8. Pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the study period.
  9. Subjects participating in other similar product or therapeutic trials within the last four weeks.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MetProUltima

    Test product Name: MetProUltima Marketed By\| Manufactured By: Meteoric Biopharmaceuticals Private Limited Mode of Usage: Take one capsule after each meal, twice daily. Frequency: Twice a Day Route of Administration: Oral

    Other: MetProUltima

Interventions

  • OtherMetProUltima

    Test product Name: MetProUltima Marketed By\| Manufactured By: Meteoric Biopharmaceuticals Private Limited Mode of Usage: Take one capsule after each meal, twice daily. Frequency: Twice a Day Route of Administration: Oral

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in stool consistency based on the Bristol Stool Criteria

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in stool based on the Bristol Stool Criteria categorizes stools into one of seven stool types ranging from type 1 (hard lumps) to type 7 (watery diarrhoea).

    Time frame: Baseline before usage of the test product on Day 01, and after usage of the test product on Day 45 and on Day 90

  2. Change in faecal microbiota using 16s Metagenome sequencing

    To evaluate the effectiveness of test product in terms of change in faecal microbiota using 16s Metagenome sequencing

    Time frame: Baseline at Day 1, and on Day 90.

  3. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of frequency of sensation of defecation

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of frequency of sensation of defecation according to a 5-point Likert scale, with a score ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 20 (very severe symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  4. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of bloating

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of bloating in which scoring done as less than 1 week=1, less than1 month=2, less than 2 months=3 and more than 2 months=4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  5. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of nausea

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of nausea where scoring determined no nausea=0, mild nausea=1-2, moderate nausea 3-6, and severe nausea7-9

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  6. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of altered bowel habit.

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of altered bowel habit in which scoring done as less than 1 week=1, less than1 month=2, less than 2 months=3 and more than 2 months=4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  7. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of digestion issues

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of digestion issues in which scoring done on yes or no

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  8. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of aching joints

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of aching joints in which scoring done as less than 1 week=1, less than1 month=2, less than 2 months=3 and more than 2 months=4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  9. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of chronic fatigue

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of chronic fatigue in which scoring done as less than 1 week=1, less than1 month=2, less than 6 months=3 and more than 6 months=4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  10. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Frequency of bowel movements

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Frequency of bowel movements in which scoring done 1-2 times per 1-2 days=1 and less than once per month=4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  11. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Completeness: feeling incomplete evacuation

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Completeness: feeling incomplete evacuation in which scoring done never=0 and always=4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  12. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Time: minutes in lavatory per attempt

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Time: minutes in lavatory per attempt in which scoring done Less than 5=0 and More than 30=4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  13. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Failure: unsuccessful attempts for evacuation per 24 hours

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Failure: unsuccessful attempts for evacuation per 24 hours in which scoring done never=0 and More than 9 =4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  14. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Difficulty: painful evacuation effort

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Difficulty: painful evacuation effort in which scoring done never=0 and always =4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  15. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Pain: abdominal pain

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Pain: abdominal pain in which scoring done never=0 and always =4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  16. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Assistance: type of assistance

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for Assistance: type of assistance in which scoring done without assistance=0 and Digital assistance or enema =2

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  17. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for History: duration of constipation (years)

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of constipation for History: duration of constipation (years) in which scoring done 0=0 and more than 20 =4

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

  18. Abbreviated physical examinations in terms of diarrhoea

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the test product by performing abbreviated physical examinations in terms of diarrhoeawhere score, severe diarrhea - having more than 10 loose, watery stools in a single day (24 hours). Moderate diarrhea -having more than a few but not more than 10 diarrhea stools in a day and Mild

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness by biomarkers like CRP (C reactive protein).

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product by Biomarkers like CRP(C reactive protein)

    Time frame: baseline Day 01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  2. Effectiveness by biomarkers like IL-6 (Interleukin-6).

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product by Biomarkers IL-6 (Interleukin-6)

    Time frame: baseline Day 01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  3. Effectiveness of the test product in terms of subject perception questionnaire where scoring by licert scale where 1 = not at all and 5=Extremely

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of subject perception questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline before usage of the test product on Day 01 and after usage of the test product, on Day 45 and on Day 90

  4. change in lab parameters-Hemoglobin

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Hemoglobin

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  5. change in lab parameters-Hematocrit

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Hematocrit

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  6. change in lab parameters-RBC Counts (Red Blood Corpuscle)

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters RBC Counts (Red Blood Corpuscle)

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  7. change in lab parameters-MCV (Mean corpuscular volume)

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters MCV (Mean corpuscular volume)

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  8. change in lab parameters-MCH (mean corpuscular hemoglobin)

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters MCH (mean corpuscular hemoglobin)

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  9. change in lab parameters-MCHC (Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration)

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters MCHC (Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration)

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  10. change in lab parameters-RDW (Red cell distribution width)

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters RDW (Red cell distribution width)

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  11. change in lab parameters-WBC Counts (White blood cells)

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters WBC Counts (White blood cells)

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  12. change in lab parameters-Neutrophils

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Neutrophils

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  13. change in lab parameters-Lymphocytes

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Lymphocytes

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  14. change in lab parameters-Eosinophils

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Eosinophils

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  15. change in lab parameters-Monocytes

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Monocytes

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  16. change in lab parameters-Basophils

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Basophils

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  17. change in lab parameters-RBC morphology

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters RBC morphology

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  18. change in lab parameters-Platelet Count

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Platelet Count

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  19. change in lab parameters-Random Blood Sugar

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Random Blood Sugar

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  20. change in lab parameters-Total Serum Cholesterol

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Total Serum Cholesterol

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  21. change in lab parameters-Triglyceride

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Triglyceride

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  22. change in lab parameters-HDL (High-density lipoprotein cholesterol)

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters HDL (High-density lipoprotein cholesterol)

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  23. change in lab parameters-LDL (Low-density lipoprotein)

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters LDL (Low-density lipoprotein)

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  24. change in lab parameters-Serum Creatinine

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in lab parameters Serum Creatinine

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  25. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Color

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Color

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  26. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Transparency

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Transparency

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  27. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Specific Gravity

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Specific Gravity

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  28. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -pH

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -pH

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  29. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Albumin

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Albumin

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  30. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Glucose

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Glucose

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  31. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Bile Salts

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Bile Salts

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  32. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Bile Pigments

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Bile Pigments

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  33. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Bilirubin

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Bilirubin

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  34. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Urobilinogen

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Urobilinogen

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  35. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Ketone

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Ketone

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  36. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Nitrite

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Nitrite

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  37. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -RBCs (Red Blood Corpuscle)

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -RBCs (Red Blood Corpuscle)

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  38. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Leucocyte

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Leucocyte

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  39. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -WBC (White blood cell)

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -WBC (White blood cell)

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  40. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Epithelial Cell

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Epithelial Cell

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  41. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Casts

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Casts

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  42. change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Crystals

    To assess the effectiveness of the test product in terms of change in Urine Routine and Microscopy -Crystals

    Time frame: Baseline on Day -01 and after usage of the test product on Day 90.

  43. Adverse events

    Safety will be determined by treatment-emergent adverse events such as allergies, diarrhoea, bloating, nausea, headache assessed by the study investigator.

    Time frame: Baseline Day 1, Day 45 and on Day 90

07

Study locations

1 site
  • NovoBliss Research Pvt.Ltd
    Ahmadabad, Gujarat 382481, India
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2024 to primary completion in Feb 2025, 3 months.

Of 71 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dysbiosis, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 28. This study's 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 83 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 11, 2024
First posted
Aug 27, 2024
StartActual
Oct 22, 2024
Primary completionActual
Feb 7, 2025
CompletionActual
Feb 7, 2025
Last update
Mar 3, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06572358
Lead sponsor
NovoBliss Research Pvt Ltd
Collaborators
Meteoric Biopharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2024
Start date
Oct 22, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 7, 2025
Completion
Feb 7, 2025
Last update
Mar 3, 2025

Study contacts

Dr. Nayan K Patel
principal investigator · NovoBliss Research Pvt Ltd

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion