CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06572150MIXT-DBSUpdated Feb 12, 2025

Minimal Electrophysiology and Imaging Enhanced Deep Brain Stimulation

An interventional study of Deep Brain Stimulation - Minimal Electrophysiology and Deep Brain Stimulation - Standard in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by Nova Scotia Health Authority. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-12.

Sponsored by Nova Scotia Health Authority · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to learn if Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery can be streamlined for patients being treated for Parkinson's disease. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can a streamlined DBS surgery protocol with minimal electrophysiology and imaging (MiXT) safely replace the current use of intraoperative electrophysiology?
  • Are we able to improve the efficiency, lower the invasiveness, and improve the clinical outcomes for patients undergoing DBS surgery?

Researchers will compare patients undergoing DBS surgery with this streamlined protocol to patients who previously underwent DBS surgery with the standard protocol to see if the accuracy, clinical outcomes, and efficiency improve.

Participants will undergo the standard protocol for DBS work-up and follow-up, but with minimal intraoperative electrophysiological testing.

Read the detailed description

In deep brain stimulation (DBS), accurate implantation of the stimulation electrode into the surgical target is crucial for a successful clinical outcome. The classic technique for surgical planning uses stereotactic atlases developed from a limited number of post-mortem samples. To better account for individual variability, imaging- and electrophysiology-based techniques have been developed. Electrophysiological techniques may offer intraoperative insight into anatomical positioning. Macrostimulation and microelectrode recording are gold-standards for simulating the therapeutic effects of stimulation during surgery, as well as predicting the threshold of stimulation-induced side effects. However, these techniques result in increased procedural time, reduced accuracy due to brain shift, and increased procedural risk due to the up to five electrode penetrations through brain tissue for testing. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) deliver stimulation across the test and final implanted electrode to predict distance to the motor tract, and have been previously shown by our group to be an effective predictor of therapeutic threshold and side effects.

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used to directly visualize target structures for individual patients, such as the subthalamic nucleus (STN), internal globus pallidus (GPi), and ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM). However, differentiating between the target and surrounding tissue is challenging for some surgical targets, and pre-surgical MRI may give imprecise coordinates of brain structures due to brain shift during surgery. Advances in machine learning have led to the development of software for assisting with detecting surgical targets from MRI images and for merging intraoperative images with the preoperative MRI images to represent the stereotactic space and verify the electrode position within the operating room setting.

Currently, our center uses MEPs, microelectrode recordings, and macrostimulation with software and intraoperative imaging plan and conduct DBS surgeries. Macrostimulation and microelectrode recordings may be redundant with the introduction of intraoperative MEP testing. This study aims to assess the safety, accuracy and clinical outcomes of using the streamlined procedure of MEP testing with imaging and assistive software only. This technique will be referred to as the MiXT technique.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Deep Brain Stimulation
  • Motor evoked potentials
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Nova Scotia Health Authority is the lead sponsor of 255 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient qualifying for deep brain stimulation for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease
  • Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of consent
  • Electrical or other devices that preclude the performance of magnetic resonance imaging
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Minimal Intraoperative Electrophysiology

    Participants undergoing DBS for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease

    Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation - Minimal Electrophysiology

  • Other
    Standard Intraoperative Electrophysiology

    Participants who previously underwent DBS surgery for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease

    Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation - Standard

Interventions

  • ProcedureDeep Brain Stimulation - Minimal Electrophysiology

    Participants will undergo standard work-up and follow-up for DBS, but with minimal intraoperative electrophysiological testing.

  • ProcedureDeep Brain Stimulation - Standard

    Participants underwent DBS surgery with standard intraoperative electrophysiological testing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of implanted electrode position

    The distance between the final implanted electrode and the planned electrode, as measured on imaging software.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in disease score units on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale

    Assessment of therapeutic effects using the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

  2. Change in disease score units on the Parkinsons Disease Questionnaire

    Assessment of therapeutic effects using the Parkinsons Disease Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

  3. Efficiency of Surgery

    Assessment of operating room times and length of stay in hospital

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  4. Intraoperative intensity of stimulation in milliampere

    Intraoperative intensity of stimulation in milliamp, which elicits an activation of contralateral muscle groups (musculus interosseus dorsalis and the musculus tibialis anterior)

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  5. Safety of streamlined protocol

    Number of adverse events (neurological deficits, infections, hemorrhages), hardware complications (e.g. electrode dislocation and breakage), psychiatric side effects (e.g. depression, hypomania, obsessive behaviour), and unexpected stimulation induced side effects

    Time frame: 4, 16, and 52 weeks post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Queen Elizabeth Health Science Centre
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3A7, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06572150
Lead sponsor
Nova Scotia Health Authority
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 26, 2024
Start date
Oct 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 12, 2025

Study contacts

Lutz Weise, MD, PhD
Contact
lutz.weise@nshealth.ca
902-473-6850
Lutz Weise, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Nova Scotia Health Authority

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion