CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06567847Updated Aug 11, 2025

Neurocognitive Exercises for Ankle Instability

An interventional study of Neurocognitive Enriched Exercise and Multimodal Exercise in Ankle Sprains, sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-11.

Sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the general population, 19.0-26.6 per 1000 cases of ankle instability have been reported, while in the athletic population, the rate is 11.3 per 1000. Ankle instability also predisposes individuals to recurrent instability, leading to persistent symptoms. After ankle injuries, temporary increases in afferent activity, along with long-term deficits in somatosensory information from ligaments, may cause central neuroplasticity that affects sensorimotor function. This central neuroplasticity can lead to permanent dysfunctions in the affected limb, thereby increasing the likelihood of developing and maintaining chronic ankle instability (CAI). In addition to the association between impaired balance and reduced proprioception with CAI, it has been reported that the central nervous system may fail to manage joint stress due to its inability to discern load on the ligaments.

Impaired neurocognition has been linked to decreased performance and higher rates of re-injury. Deficiencies in neuromuscular control, motor learning, or other neurocognitive components related to an individual's performance and safety may affect the ability to respond appropriately in a dynamic environment. Any deficiencies in these neurocognitive processes can hinder the successful completion of tasks.

The aim of this study is to comparatively examine the effects of neurocognitively enriched rehabilitation versus traditional rehabilitation on re-injury risk, balance, and proprioception in individuals with a history of ankle instability.

Read the detailed description

Voluntary participants who have been diagnosed with lateral ankle instability will be included in the study. Signed voluntary consent will be obtained from participants. Participants will be divided into two groups. Study groups will be as follows: a) Neurocognitive Enriched Exercise, b) Multimodal Exercise.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ankle Sprains

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Neuroplasticity
  • Reinjury
  • Chronic ankle instability
  • Physiotherapy
03

In context

Ankle Injuries

352 studies on the registry are indexed under Ankle Injuries; 72 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 56 across 273 interventional studies indexed under Ankle Injuries.

Browse Ankle Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa is the lead sponsor of 680 studies on the registry; 208 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The documented unilateral ankle instability confirmed through clinical examinations (drawer test, talar tilt test) and MRI in cases requiring differential diagnosis.
  • A history of an initial ankle sprain occurring at least 6 months ago.
  • The presence of a recurrent sense of giving way that started at least 6 months ago and has been intermittently persistent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a history of previous surgery in the lower extremity.
  • Identification of organic and non-organic lesions such as cartilage injuries, periarticular tendon tears, and impingement syndromes.
  • The existence of a fracture accompanying instability in the foot-ankle.
  • Presence of congenital deformities in the foot-ankle.
  • Diagnosis of talus osteochondral lesion.
  • Diagnosis of ankle arthritis.
  • Presence of medial ligament lesion.
  • Existence of peripheral neuropathy.
  • Presence of additional rheumatological diseases.
  • Regular moderate-level exercise for at least 3 days a week in the last 6 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Neurocognitive Enriched Exercise

    Individuals with a diagnosis of lateral ankle instability who underwent supervised neurocognitive enriched exercise under the guidance of a physiotherapist for 8 weeks, 2 days a week.

    Other: Neurocognitive Enriched Exercise

  • Active comparator
    Multimodal Exercise

    Individuals with a diagnosis of lateral ankle instability who underwent supervised routine exercise under the guidance of a physiotherapist for 8 weeks, 2 days a week.

    Other: Multimodal Exercise

Interventions

  • OtherNeurocognitive Enriched Exercise

    An intervention planned, progressed, and conducted under the supervision of a physiotherapist, which enriches strengthening, balance, range of motion, stretching, and mobilization exercises with neurocognitive elements.

  • OtherMultimodal Exercise

    Supervised and progressively advanced interventions that include strengthening, balance, range of motion, stretching, and mobilization exercises.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)

    It is a 30-point, 9-item scale measuring the severity of functional ankle instability. Lower scores indicate functional ankle instability. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for this valid and reliable scale is 3 points.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 6 months

  2. Surface Electromyography-maximum voluntary isometric contraction

    Electrode placements will be performed in accordance with the European Recommendations from Surface EMG for Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles (SENIAM).

    Time frame: change from baseline at 6 months

  3. Surface Electromyography-muscles' normal functional activities

    Electrode placements will be performed in accordance with the European Recommendations from Surface EMG for Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles (SENIAM).

    Time frame: change from baseline at 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ultrasonography

    The pennation angles of the peroneal, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscle groups will be evaluated and recorded using ultrasonographic imaging. The pennation angle will be defined as the angle between the muscle fascicle and the superficial aponeurosis.

    Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks

  2. Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Pain during activity in the ankle will be assessed with a pain NPRS, a numbered scale of 11 points. On this scale, "0" indicates no pain, and "10" indicates the most severe pain imaginable.

    Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks

  3. Joint Range of Motion Evaluation

    During the assessments, three repeat measurements will be made using an electronic goniometer. For goniometric measurement, the pivot point will be placed on the lateral malleolus. The fixed arm will be kept parallel to the lateral midline of the fibula. The moving arm, on the other hand, will follow the lateral midline of the 5th metatarsal bone.

    Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks

  4. Tampa Kinesiophoby Scoring

    It is a 17-item scale developed to assess the fear of movement/re-injury. The lowest possible score on the test is 17; the highest score is 68; and a score higher than 37 is an indicator of poor health outcomes.

    Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks

  5. Star Excursion Test

    Physical performance that requires strength, flexibility, and proprioception is assessed through a dynamic test evaluating dynamic postural control and lower extremity injury risk associated with musculoskeletal injuries. The protocol of the test involves maintaining balance on the ipsilateral leg while reaching as far as possible with the contralateral leg.

    Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks

  6. Single Leg Stance Test

    Participants' standing balance will be assessed. Initially, one foot will be positioned on a firm and flat surface with the entire lower extremity in full extension, while the other lower extremity is positioned with the hip and knee flexed at 90 degrees. With their eyes closed, participants will start the timing when the foot not being tested loses contact with the ground, and the timing will stop when they place their foot back on the ground or when there is a significant increase in body sway.

    Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks

  7. The Side Hop Test

    It is a test that assesses the functional stability of patients. Patients will be asked to stand on one leg on the affected extremity. They will then be required to perform 10 jumps over two pre-determined strips that are spaced 30 cm apart.

    Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks

  8. Global Rating of Change Scale-GRC

    It will be used to evaluate patient satisfaction. It is designed to determine the amount of improvement or worsening of the patient over time. In our study, GRC consisting of 5 levels between -2 and +2 value ranges (-2: I am much worse, -1: I am worse, 0: I am the same, 1: I am better, 2: I am much better) was preferred.

    Time frame: 2 times for 52 weeks

  9. Reproduction Test

    While the eyes of the individuals are closed, the ankle joints will be positioned and a goniometric measurement will be performed. Then, the patient will be brought to the starting position and asked to achieve the same movement. The difference between the two measurements will be recorded.

    Time frame: 3 times for 24 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University
    Istanbul, 34752, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gribble PA, Bleakley CM, Caulfield BM, Docherty CL, Fourchet F, Fong DT, Hertel J, Hiller CE, Kaminski TW, McKeon PO, Refshauge KM, Verhagen EA, Vicenzino BT, Wikstrom EA, Delahunt E. Evidence review for the 2016 International Ankle Consortium consensus statement on the prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;50(24):1496-1505. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096189. Epub 2016 Jun 3. PubMed 27259753 ↗
  • Owoeye OBA, Palacios-Derflingher LM, Emery CA. Prevention of Ankle Sprain Injuries in Youth Soccer and Basketball: Effectiveness of a Neuromuscular Training Program and Examining Risk Factors. Clin J Sport Med. 2018 Jul;28(4):325-331. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000462. PubMed 29864071 ↗
  • van Dijk CN, Vuurberg G. There is no such thing as a simple ankle sprain: clinical commentary on the 2016 International Ankle Consortium position statement. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;51(6):485-486. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096733. Epub 2016 Oct 18. No abstract available. PubMed 27797735 ↗
  • Xue X, Ma T, Li Q, Song Y, Hua Y. Chronic ankle instability is associated with proprioception deficits: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci. 2021 Mar;10(2):182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Oct 2. PubMed 33017672 ↗
  • Suttmiller AMB, McCann RS. Neural excitability of lower extremity musculature in individuals with and without chronic ankle instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2020 Aug;53:102436. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102436. Epub 2020 Jun 1. PubMed 32505988 ↗
  • Needle AR, Lepley AS, Grooms DR. Central Nervous System Adaptation After Ligamentous Injury: a Summary of Theories, Evidence, and Clinical Interpretation. Sports Med. 2017 Jul;47(7):1271-1288. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0666-y. PubMed 28005191 ↗
  • Wilke J, Groneberg DA. Neurocognitive function and musculoskeletal injury risk in sports:A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2022 Jan;25(1):41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 9. PubMed 34303619 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06567847
Lead sponsor
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Collaborators
Bezmialem Vakif University, Acıbadem Atunizade Hospital
Responsible party
Aysenur Erekdag (Principal Investigator, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 23, 2024
Start date
Nov 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2025

Study contacts

Ayşenur Erekdağ, MSc
Contact
aysenurerekdag@gmail.com
+902124012600 ext. 4639
Ipek Yeldan, PhD
Contact
ipekyeldan@gmail.com
+902128663700
Ayşenur Erekdağ, MSc
principal investigator · Bezmialem Vakif University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion