ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06554691Markers4CareUpdated Dec 2, 2025

Understanding the Immune System's Role in Tree Nut and Peanut Allergies: Key Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring and Treatment Targets

An observational study in Food Allergy, Food Allergy in Children and Food Allergy Peanut, sponsored by Luxembourg Institute of Health. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in Luxembourg. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-02.

Sponsored by Luxembourg Institute of Health · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90
Ages
2 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Peanut and tree nuts belong to the main elicitors of pediatric food allergy and are the main cause of near fatal reactions in children requiring emergency management. Oral immunotherapy has emerged as an alternative treatment option for the management of food allergies, to enhance patients' safety and quality of life. Monitoring if the therapy is working relies on oral food challenges during the course of treatment. There is a clear need for reliable biomarkers that are reflective of the clinical progression during oral food challenges and during immunotherapy that would help with patient stratification and possibly for personalized treatment approaches in the future

The aim of this study is to measure immune parameters in the blood of nut-allergic participants during oral food challenges and during the course of oral immunotherapy.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  1. Identify immune markers that correlate with clinical reactivity
  2. Identify immune changes and markers that correlate with immunotherapy outcome

Researchers will compare these immune parameters between nut-allergic participants on oral immunotherapy and with nut-allergic participants on avoidance diet. Additionally, we will also compare the immune parameters of these nut-allergic participants with those healthy adults.

Read the detailed description

Background: The prevalence of peanut together with tree nut allergies have increase over the years and accounts for most of the life-threatening reactions even to minute doses of the allergen. Consequently, peanut and tree-nut allergies cause significant physical and mental burden to patients and their caretakers due to anxiety and fear of anaphylaxis from accidental exposures, stress from following a strict elimination diet, lack of proactive management plan and due to the low probability of natural recovery of such allergies. For decades, the management relied on a strict avoidance of the culprit foods. Oral immune therapy (OIT) is a ground breaking alternative modality to strict avoidance diets. OIT consist of gradual introduction of low doses of the implicated food allergen with the aim to modulate the patient's immune response and help build immunological and clinical tolerance. Though OIT has its strong advantages, the clinical outcome is variable among the patients. Therefore, there is a clear need for reliable ex-vivo biomarkers that are reflective of the clinical progression and therapy outcome that could aid with a more accurate patient stratification for personalized treatment approaches in the future.

Aims: This project aims at measuring immune targets, antibodies, immune cells and immune mediators, in patients' blood during oral food challenges (OFCs) and during the course of standard-of-care oral immunotherapy to identify new immune markers correlating to with the clinical outcome of the treatment. The identification of immune modifications during OIT will allow us to endotype patients and possibly aid in unraveling markers of food challenges and therapy progression as well as OIT outcome.

Luxembourg partners: The Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Department of Infection and Immunity (DII; head Prof. M. Ollert) has the scientific project lead (Principal Investigator Dr. A. Kuehn). Main clinical partners are Dr. F. Codreanu-Morel and Dr. V. Petit-Cordebar from the National Unit of Immunology-Allergology, Centre Hospitalier (CHL), Luxembourg. Medical Principal Investigator for healthy controls is Dr. Alessia Pochesci, MD, Clinical and Epidemiological Investigation Center (CIEC), Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Luxembourg. The Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg (IBBL) will prepare and store a subset of clinical samples until use. Other biological samples are prepared and stored at DII, LIH. Clinical samples (blood, sera, plasma,stool) will be analyzed at DII, LIH.

Project implementation: The clinicians at CHL will perform detailed clinical examinations of participants including skin prick test (SPT), serological analysis for specific IgE and food challenges to the implicated food allergen as per their routine clinical practice at the National Unit of Immunology-Allergology (CHL). Based on the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) guidelines and procedures established at CHL, all peanut- and tree-nut-allergic participants eligible for the study will undergo a baseline OFC. OFC is adapted from PRACTALL protocol and allergen doses are adjusted according to the clinical reactivity of the patient.

For participants eligible for immunotherapy (N= 30 Peanut-OIT and N=30 Tree nut-OIT), the OIT is based on the established protocol at the clinic and adapted from the current literature. Briefly, participant ingest incremental doses of the allergen (peanut/tree nut) at home until they reach a maintenance dose of 300 mg nut-protein in approximately 26 weeks (6 months). This initial phase of OIT is termed as the build-up phase. This is then followed by continued daily intake of this maintenance dose. After a minimum of 12 months of the maintenance phase of OIT, participants undergo another final OFC at the hospital to assess for desensitization to peanut or tree nut. Participants follow up at the hospital every 6 months i.e at end of the build-up phase, after 6 months and after 12 months of daily intake of maintenance dose.

Participants who are not eligible for OIT (N=30 peanut and tree-nut allergic) and who are on avoidance diet, are also followed up every 6 months for 18 months. However, final OFC will not be done for these participants.

The data collection of the study participants is carried out by the medical lead.

In addition, healthy adults (N=20) tolerating any type of nut and without any known food allergies will be recruited as controls. Dr. Alessia Pochesci, CIEC, LIH is responsible for the data collection from these healthy participants.

Blood sample collection:

i) For OIT group:

  • During the baseline and final OFC , blood samples will be collected at the beginning, during and at the end of the food challenge in three different vials.
  • During OIT follow-up, a one-time blood sample will be collected at the end of the build-up phase and after 6 months of maintenance phase in addition to the routine blood collection during these follow-up visits.

ii) For avoidance group:

  • During the baseline OFC , blood samples will be collected at the beginning, during and at the end of the food challenge.
  • During follow-up visits, one-time blood sampling will be taken six monthly i.e. at 6, 12 and 18 months after the baseline OFC.

iii) Healthy Adult participants: A one-time blood sampling will be done.

Stool sample collection:

Stool sample will be collected from nut-allergic participants at baseline and after the completion of a minimum of 18 months of the study duration using commercial at-home stool sampling kits. Participants receive a collection kit, containing special sampling tubes, accessories and instructions.

Collected clinical samples will be pseudonymized at the clinical centers. A synonym list containing the information on the identify of the participants recruited and their corresponding pseudonym, will be available at the clinical center only (medical investigators). Personal data is protected under the regulation (EU) 2016/679 of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data (GDPR) and the law of 1 August 2018 on the organization of the National Data Protection Commission and the General Data Protection Act.

02

Conditions studied

  • Food Allergy
  • Food Allergy in Children
  • Food Allergy Peanut
  • Tree Nut Allergies
  • Allergy;Food
  • Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy

Keywords

  • food allergy
  • peanut allergy
  • tree nut allergy
  • nut allergy
03

In context

Food Hypersensitivity

376 studies on the registry are indexed under Food Hypersensitivity; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is below the median of 151 across 120 observational studies indexed under Food Hypersensitivity.

Browse Food Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Luxembourg Institute of Health is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

For peanut and tree nut-allergic cohort, participants are selected from the Immnulogy and Allergology Deparment at the Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg.

For the healthy adults cohort, participants are recruited from the Luxembourg population.

Eligibility criteria

For Peanut and Tree nut Allergic participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • More than 2 years
  • Male or Female
  • Allergic to peanut (assessed by anamnesis, skin reactivity testing, sera testing for specific IgE)
  • Sign an

Exclusion criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Less than 2 years of age
  • Co-existing chronic medical condition such as cardiovascular disorders
  • Peanut or tree nut-allergic patients/families who are unwilling to undergo oral food challenges

The eligible participants will be assigned to the oral immunotherapy (OIT) group but if they are not eligible for OIT based on either on the reasons mentioned below, they will be assigned to the avoidance group.

Reasons for ineligibility of OIT :

  • risk of poor compliance with immunotherapy
  • lack of understanding of the OIT protocol
  • uncontrolled asthma
  • incompatibility with lifestyle (regular intense physical activities, multiple vacations)
  • unwilling to undergo OIT
  • long-term or frequent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • multiple nut allergy with no direct clinical benefit of OIT to one nut
  • co-existing comorbidities such as active systemic diseases, active , eosinophilic esophagitis.

For Healthy Controls

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults
  • Male or Female
  • Sign an Informed Consent
  • Tolerates any type of nut
  • No known food allergy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Co-existing chronic medical condition such as cardiovascular disorders
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
18 Months
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Oral Immunotherapy

    Participants in this group undergo oral immunotherapy as part of their routine management of their nut allergies

  • Avoidance diet

    Participants in this group are on strict avoidance diet as part of their nut allergy management

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Baseline Immunophenotyping of peanut versus tree nut allergic participants

    To identify the baseline immuonophenotypes using mass cytometry/flow cytometry for peanut versus tree nut-allergic participants and to correlate these findings with the oral food challenge and oral immunotherapy outcome.

    Time frame: From enrollment to after 18 months of oral immunotherapy

  2. Immune changes during Oral Food Challenge and Immune changes from baseline to 18 months of Oral Immunotherapy

    To investigate and map immune changes reflective of inflammation and cell migration during oral food challenge (OFC) and oral immunotherapy (OIT) in children with nut allergy. We will compare the immune profiles from OFC samples before commencing OIT vs OFC after 18 months of OIT. The immnue changes will also be compared to those nut-allergic participants on avoidance diet.

    Time frame: From enrollment to after 18 months of immunotherapy (for oral immunotherapy group) and from enrollment to the end of 18 months follow up for avoidance diet group

Secondary outcomes

  1. Integration of the immune cell changes observed from the primary outcome with the serological and other immunological parameters

    Serological parameters such as specific IgE and immune mediators such as cytokines measured at baseline and follow up visits will be correlated with the immune cell changes observed from the primary outcome

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of 18 months of immunotherapy (for oral immunotherapy group) and to the end of 18 months follow up (for the avoidance group)

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg
    Luxembourg, 1210, Luxembourg
  • Clinical and Epidemiological Investigation Center, Luxembourg Institute of Health
    Luxembourg, 1210, Luxembourg
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Luce S, Chinthrajah S, Lyu SC, Nadeau KC, Mascarell L. Th2A and Th17 cell frequencies and regulatory markers as follow-up biomarker candidates for successful multifood oral immunotherapy. Allergy. 2020 Jun;75(6):1513-1516. doi: 10.1111/all.14180. Epub 2020 Jan 31. No abstract available. PubMed 31930521 ↗
  • Bajzik V, DeBerg HA, Garabatos N, Rust BJ, Obrien KK, Nguyen QA, O'Rourke C, Smith A, Walker AH, Quinn C, Gersuk VH, Farrington M, Jeong D, Vickery BP, Adelman DC, Wambre E. Oral desensitization therapy for peanut allergy induces dynamic changes in peanut-specific immune responses. Allergy. 2022 Aug;77(8):2534-2548. doi: 10.1111/all.15276. Epub 2022 Mar 14. PubMed 35266148 ↗
  • Monian B, Tu AA, Ruiter B, Morgan DM, Petrossian PM, Smith NP, Gierahn TM, Ginder JH, Shreffler WG, Love JC. Peanut oral immunotherapy differentially suppresses clonally distinct subsets of T helper cells. J Clin Invest. 2022 Jan 18;132(2):e150634. doi: 10.1172/JCI150634. PubMed 34813505 ↗
  • Santos AF, Du Toit G, O'Rourke C, Becares N, Couto-Francisco N, Radulovic S, Khaleva E, Basting M, Harris KM, Larson D, Sayre P, Plaut M, Roberts G, Bahnson HT, Lack G. Biomarkers of severity and threshold of allergic reactions during oral peanut challenges. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Aug;146(2):344-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.03.035. Epub 2020 Apr 18. PubMed 32311390 ↗
  • Calise J, DeBerg H, Garabatos N, Khosa S, Bajzik V, Calderon LB, Aldridge K, Rosasco M, Ferslew BC, Zhu T, Smulders R, Wheatley LM, Laidlaw TM, Qin T, Chichili GR, Adelman DC, Farrington M, Robinson D, Jeong D, Jones SM, Sanda S, Larson D, Kwok WW, Baloh C, Nepom GT, Wambre E; IMPACT. Distinct trajectories distinguish antigen-specific T cells in peanut-allergic individuals undergoing oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Jul;152(1):155-166.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.03.020. Epub 2023 Mar 30. PubMed 37003475 ↗
  • Zhou X, Yu W, Lyu SC, Macaubas C, Bunning B, He Z, Mellins ED, Nadeau KC. A positive feedback loop reinforces the allergic immune response in human peanut allergy. J Exp Med. 2021 Jul 5;218(7):e20201793. doi: 10.1084/jem.20201793. Epub 2021 May 4. PubMed 33944900 ↗
  • Wanniang N, Boehm TM, Codreanu-Morel F, Divaret-Chauveau A, Assugeni I, Hilger C, Kuehn A. Immune signatures predicting the clinical outcome of peanut oral immunotherapy: where we stand. Front Allergy. 2023 Oct 2;4:1270344. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1270344. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37849958 ↗
  • Neeland MR, Andorf S, Manohar M, Dunham D, Lyu SC, Dang TD, Peters RL, Perrett KP, Tang MLK, Saffery R, Koplin JJ, Nadeau KC. Mass cytometry reveals cellular fingerprint associated with IgE+ peanut tolerance and allergy in early life. Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 27;11(1):1091. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14919-4. PubMed 32107388 ↗
  • Sampson HA, Gerth van Wijk R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Sicherer S, Teuber SS, Burks AW, Dubois AE, Beyer K, Eigenmann PA, Spergel JM, Werfel T, Chinchilli VM. Standardizing double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology PRACTALL consensus report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Dec;130(6):1260-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.017. No abstract available. PubMed 23195525 ↗
  • Pajno GB, Fernandez-Rivas M, Arasi S, Roberts G, Akdis CA, Alvaro-Lozano M, Beyer K, Bindslev-Jensen C, Burks W, Ebisawa M, Eigenmann P, Knol E, Nadeau KC, Poulsen LK, van Ree R, Santos AF, du Toit G, Dhami S, Nurmatov U, Boloh Y, Makela M, O'Mahony L, Papadopoulos N, Sackesen C, Agache I, Angier E, Halken S, Jutel M, Lau S, Pfaar O, Ryan D, Sturm G, Varga EM, van Wijk RG, Sheikh A, Muraro A; EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy Guidelines Group. EAACI Guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2018 Apr;73(4):799-815. doi: 10.1111/all.13319. Epub 2017 Dec 5. PubMed 29205393 ↗
  • Schoos AM, Bullens D, Chawes BL, Costa J, De Vlieger L, DunnGalvin A, Epstein MM, Garssen J, Hilger C, Knipping K, Kuehn A, Mijakoski D, Munblit D, Nekliudov NA, Ozdemir C, Patient K, Peroni D, Stoleski S, Stylianou E, Tukalj M, Verhoeckx K, Zidarn M, van de Veen W. Immunological Outcomes of Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in Food Allergy. Front Immunol. 2020 Nov 3;11:568598. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.568598. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33224138 ↗
  • Zhang L, Chun Y, Arditi Z, Grishina G, Lo T, Wisotzkey K, Agashe C, Grishin A, Wang J, Sampson HA, Sicherer S, Berin MC, Bunyavanich S. Joint transcriptomic and cytometric study of children with peanut allergy reveals molecular and cellular cross talk in reaction thresholds. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Jun;153(6):1721-1728. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.12.028. Epub 2024 Jan 23. PubMed 38272374 ↗
  • Klueber J, Czolk R, Codreanu-Morel F, Montamat G, Revets D, Konstantinou M, Cosma A, Hunewald O, Skov PS, Ammerlaan W, Hilger C, Bindslev-Jensen C, Ollert M, Kuehn A. High-dimensional immune profiles correlate with phenotypes of peanut allergy during food-allergic reactions. Allergy. 2023 Apr;78(4):1020-1035. doi: 10.1111/all.15408. Epub 2022 Jun 24. PubMed 35700055 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 38 months after the start.

Of 42 non-industry observational studies under Food Hypersensitivity, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 250. This study's planned 38 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 43 studies reached it within 42 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 250.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 12, 2024
First posted
Aug 15, 2024
StartActual
Oct 2, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Dec 2, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06554691
Lead sponsor
Luxembourg Institute of Health
Collaborators
Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 15, 2024
Start date
Oct 2, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 2, 2025

Study contacts

Annette Kuehn
principal investigator · Luxembourg Institute of Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion