CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06554483Updated May 29, 2025

The Effects of Neuroscience Based Proprioceptive Exercise Training

An interventional study of Exercise in Chronic Knee Pain, Pain, Chronic and Elderly, sponsored by Pamukkale University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-29.

Sponsored by Pamukkale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neuroscience based proprioceptive exercise trainig using laser pointer (nbpet) is a new aproach exercise training method. In this study, This study aimed to investigate the effects of nbpet using laser pointer on different fonctional parameters.

Read the detailed description

This study aim to investigate the effects of nbpet using laser pointer on different fonctional parameters.

Participants will divide into two groups (experimental and control ). Joint position errors will evaluate with the jonit position error assessment method, range of motion with a goniometer, kinesiophobia with the Tampa kinesiophobia scale, pain with the Mc Gill pain scale, quality of life with the Older People Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQoL-brief), and mobility with the time up and go test. Both groups will include in the exercise program with proprioceptive exercise training for 2 sessions per week for 6 weeks. In addition, the experimental group will train with nbpet using laser pointer at the same time.

Properioceptive training A proprioceptive training regimen will establish with Swiss balls. The proprioceptive activities is advanced on a weekly basis in order to test the patient\'s balance in response. Patients have training in three stages: beginning, intermediate, and advanced. Each exercise will perform as 3x10 repetitions. Between sets, 2-3 minutes rest breaks will given. The beginning phase will applied in the 1st and 2nd weeks, the intemediate phase in the 3rd and 4th weeks, and the advanced phase in the 5th and 6th weeks. The proprioceptive rehabilitation protocol is based on a previous study. All the program will conducted by one experienced physiotherapist.

Neuroscience based proprioceptive training using laser pointer A pre-created wallpaper indicating various directions will fix on the wall 90 cm away from the patient (at the level of the patient\'s knee when the patient was standing upright) . Then, the laser pointer (producted by NMC training system) will fix to the patient\'s knee with the help of a velcro so as not to interfere with the patient\'s knee movement.

At the beginning of the exercise, the patient is asked to move the light on the laser pointer to the midpoint of the wallpaper. The patient is then asked to follow the instructions on the wallpaper by moving the knee in flexion-extension, medio-lateral directions. These instructions are continued throughout the exercise in different directions. Meanwhile, the patient is asked to perform mild cognitive tasks such as counting numbers, names of people starting with any letter, city names or animal names. The training continues for approximately 20 minutes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Knee Pain
  • Pain, Chronic
  • Elderly

Browse trials for

03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Pamukkale University is the lead sponsor of 331 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • having a history of knee pain for 6 months or longer
  • having unilateral knee pain, being 60 years of age or older, and completing the assessments.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • being under 60 years of age, having bilateral knee pain
  • being diagnosed with a disease that may cause knee pain (osteatritis, meniscus rupture, ACL rupture...)
  • having knee pain for less than 6 months
  • have visual and hearing impairments that affect exercise, having knee extension limitations.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    neuroscience based proprioceptive exercise training group

    Neuroscience based proprioceptive training using laser pointer A pre-created wallpaper indicating various directions is fixed on the wall 90 cm away from the patient (at the level of the patient's knee when the patient is standing upright). Then, the laser pointer (producted by NMC training system) will fixed to the patient's knee with the help of a velcro so as not to interfere with the patient's knee movement. At the beginning of the exercise, the patient is asked to move the light on the laser pointer to the midpoint of the wallpaper. The patient is then asked to follow the instructions on the wallpaper by moving the knee in flexion-extension, medio-lateral directions. These instructions are continued throughout the exercise in different directions. Meanwhile, the patient is asked to perform mild cognitive tasks such as counting numbers, names of people starting with any letter, city names or animal names. The training continued for approximately 20 minutes.

    Other: Exercise

  • Active comparator
    Proprioceptive exercise group

    A proprioceptive training regimen will established with Swiss balls. The proprioceptive activities are advanced on a weekly basis in order to test the patient's balance in response. Patients have training in three stages: beginning, intermediate, and advanced. Each exercise is performed as 3x10 repetitions. Between sets, 2-3 minutes rest breaks is given. The beginning phase is applied in the 1st and 2nd weeks, the intemediate phase in the 3rd and 4th weeks, and the advanced phase in the 5th and 6th weeks.

    Other: Exercise

Interventions

  • OtherExercise

    supportive reliable exercise programs

    Also known as: Proprioceptive exercise

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain meausere

    Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) will used to examine pain level of participants. The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptive adjectives for the pain sensation (11 sensory and 4 affective), which are self-rated by the patient according to their intensity level on a point rating scale (0 = none,1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Three pain scores are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total descriptors. The total score is the sum of the intensity values.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. position error

    Joint Position Error measurement will used to asses knee proprioception of elderly. It is a test performed with a wall-mounted board consisting of circles drawn at a distance of 1 cm from the patient and a laser placed on the patient's knee with appropriate belts. After the laser is placed on the patient's knee, the patient stands and tries to hold the laser light at the starting point with eyes open on the board placed 90 cm away. The patient is first asked to perform 10 repetitions of knee flexion and extension and then to return the laser to the starting position with eyes closed. In the final stage, the patient's horizontal, vertical and global distance from the laser light starting point is recorded in cm

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Range of motion

    Knee range of motion assesment: Knee range of motion (KROM) will assesed using a standard goniometer, consisting of a protractor body with two arms (one stationary and one movable), was used for all measurements. Participants are positioned supine on a flat examination table For knee flexion measurements, participants are instructed to lie supine with the hip of the leg being measured in a neutral position. The fulcrum of the goniometer is placed over the lateral epicondyle of the femur, the stationary arm is aligned with the greater trochanter of the femur, and the movable arm is aligned with the lateral malleolus of the fibula

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Qualitiy of life

    Older People Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQoL-brief): OPQoL-brief will used to evaulate quality of life. A shortened version of OPQoL-brief was developed by Bowling et al. The OPQoL-brief consisted of 13 statements, with the participants being asked to indicate the extent to which they agree with each statement by selecting one of five possible options ("strongly disagree," "disagree," "neither agree nor disagree," "agree," and "strongly agree"). The range in the original version is based on the principle of point allocation. The items are summed to provide a total OPQoL-brief score. The total score of OPQoL-brief ranges from 13 to 65 and higher scores indicate better QoL. Te OPQoL - brief questionnaire also includes a preliminary single item on global OoL. This single item is not scored with the OPQOL; it is coded as very good (5) to very bad

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Kinesiophobia

    Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK): The TSK-11 will used to asses kinesiophobia. This scale consists of 11 questions. A 4-point Likert scale assigns a score to each item, which includes strongly disagree, disagree, agree, and strongly agree options. The total score ranges from 11 to 44. A high score indicates a high level of kinesiophobia. Individuals were asked to tick the appropriate box for each question, and the total score was calculated.The lowest score on this scale is 11 and the highest score is 44. The higher the score, the higher the kinesiophobia.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Time up and Go test

    The Time up and Go test (TUG): The TUG will used to evaluate mobility. The TUG is a balance and gait index which requires the patient to stand up from a chair, walk a 3 m distance, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The time required to complete the task is measured in seconds

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Aziz DENGIZ
    MUŞ, 49100, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Takahashi A, Kitamura K, Watanabe Y, Kobayashi R, Saito T, Takachi R, Kabasawa K, Oshiki R, Tsugane S, Iki M, Sasaki A, Yamazaki O, Nakamura K. Epidemiological profiles of chronic low back and knee pain in middle-aged and elderly Japanese from the Murakami cohort. J Pain Res. 2018 Dec 12;11:3161-3169. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S184746. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30588068 ↗
  • Mitchell HL, Hurley MV. Management of chronic knee pain: a survey of patient preferences and treatment received. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Sep 18;9:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-123. PubMed 18801169 ↗
  • Bjordal JM, Ljunggren AE, Klovning A, Slordal L. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, in osteoarthritic knee pain: meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. BMJ. 2004 Dec 4;329(7478):1317. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38273.626655.63. Epub 2004 Nov 23. PubMed 15561731 ↗
  • Gutthann SP, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Raiford DS. Individual nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and other risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation. Epidemiology. 1997 Jan;8(1):18-24. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199701000-00003. PubMed 9116088 ↗
  • Juni P, Reichenbach S, Egger M. COX 2 inhibitors, traditional NSAIDs, and the heart. BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1342-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1342. No abstract available. PubMed 15947376 ↗
  • Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 22;2(1):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435. Print 2012. PubMed 22357571 ↗
  • Jiang L, Zhang L, Huang W, Zeng Q, Huang G. The effect of proprioception training on knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized control trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(5):1085-1095. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210201. PubMed 35213344 ↗
  • Hajouj E, Hadian MR, Mir SM, Talebian S, Ghazi S. Effects of Innovative Aquatic Proprioceptive Training on Knee Proprioception in Athletes with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Sep;9(5):519-526. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.50106.2485. PubMed 34692934 ↗
  • Genevsky A, Garrett CT, Alexander PP, Vinogradov S. Cognitive training in schizophrenia: a neuroscience-based approach. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(3):416-21. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2010.12.3/agenevsky. PubMed 20954435 ↗
  • Kleim JA, Hogg TM, VandenBerg PM, Cooper NR, Bruneau R, Remple M. Cortical synaptogenesis and motor map reorganization occur during late, but not early, phase of motor skill learning. J Neurosci. 2004 Jan 21;24(3):628-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3440-03.2004. PubMed 14736848 ↗
  • Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987 Aug;30(2):191-197. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8. PubMed 3670870 ↗
  • Woby SR, Roach NK, Urmston M, Watson PJ. Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Pain. 2005 Sep;117(1-2):137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.029. PubMed 16055269 ↗
  • Bowling A, Hankins M, Windle G, Bilotta C, Grant R. A short measure of quality of life in older age: the performance of the brief Older People's Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL-brief). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013 Jan-Feb;56(1):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Sep 19. PubMed 22999305 ↗
  • Wall JC, Bell C, Campbell S, Davis J. The Timed Get-up-and-Go test revisited: measurement of the component tasks. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;37(1):109-13. PubMed 10847578 ↗
  • Sengupta T, Paul B, Banerjee A, Das R, Halder R. Chronic musculoskeletal pain among elderly individuals in a rural area of West Bengal: A mixed-method study. Malays Fam Physician. 2023 Apr 19;18:25. doi: 10.51866/oa.232. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37205144 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06554483
Lead sponsor
Pamukkale University
Responsible party
Fatih Tekin (Assist. Prof., Pamukkale University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2024
Start date
Jun 3, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2024
Completion
Dec 1, 2024
Last update
May 29, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion