CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06525194ARCS-VUpdated Jul 29, 2024

An Interprofessional Education Program

An interventional study of Education in Education, Professional Role and Interprofessional Relations, sponsored by Izmir Democracy University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-29.

Sponsored by Izmir Democracy University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2022, registered Jul 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim: The aim of the study was to develop and implement an interprofessional education (IPE) program that will enhance healthcare students' learning through motivating them with a theme. Methods: Undergraduate healthcare students enrolled in faculties of dentistry, medicine, and health sciences at a higher education institution in Turkey participated in this program. The program was based on the ARCS-V motivational design model, included three sessions and was hybrid. Tactics and strategies from the motivational model were used throughout the online and face-to-face training process. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) was used to assess students' readiness for interprofessional education, while the ARCS-V Motivation Scale was used to assess the program. Data were analyzed using Chi-Square test, Independent t test, Wilcoxon rank test, Mann Whitney U test, and one way analysis of variance.

Read the detailed description

The IPE program titled Chronic Disease Management and Patient Safety was carried out as a hybrid (online and face-to-face) and three-session program with a focus on interprofessional communication. The program provided students interprofessional collaboration, communication, roles and responsibilities, ethics, lifelong learning, and health service delivery skills based on patient needs and teamwork.

For this program, an announcement was made through the faculties which provide healthcare education and volunteering students from the Faculties of Dentistry, Medicine and Health Sciences (Nutrition and Dietetics, Nursing, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation) were included in the education program. A whatsapp group of volunteer students was created and used for communication and motivational strategies. The link was sent to the students ahead of time via e-mail and the whatsapp group. The tactics and strategies required by the ARCS-V Motivation Model were used throughout the whole process.

  • First session: In this session, which was online and lasted for 120 minutes, the education program was introduced to the students and conceptual information was presented. Links to the sociodemographic data form and the RIPLS were shared with the students and they were asked to fill them out prior to face to-face training.

The second and third sessions were face-to-face and were comprised of two 8-hour work days. Facilitators and students participated in these sessions.

  • Second session: Introductions and warm-up exercises were carried out. In the development phase of the ADDIE instructional design, four scenarios addressing "Chronic Disease Management and Patient Safety" which involved different health professionals were prepared. The participants were segmented into four study groups, each delineated by their respective professional domains.The formation of these groups was intentionally designed to include a proportional mix of professional fields relevant to each specific scenario. For example, the makeup of one scenario group included 2 medical students, 2 nursing students, 1 physiotherapy student, and 2 dentistry students. In a parallel manner, a different scenario group was arranged with 2 students from medicine, 2 from nursing, 1 from dentistry, and 2 focusing on nutrition and dietetics. This strategic grouping fostered a diverse yet balanced professional composition in each group, directly aligning with the scenario-driven learning objectives.

Two facilitators and one observer were appointed to each group. The task of the facilitators was to ensure that the scenario was read by the students and the discussion was guided by discussion questions.

Observers watched the students and facilitators and took notes on the process of conducting the guided discussion as part of the interprofessional education program.

The whole discussion process was audio- and video-recorded with the voluntary consent of the students and facilitators.

At the end of the day;

  • Each group was asked to make a presentation of their achievements according to the interprofessional education competencies (roles and responsibilities, communication skills, collaborative leadership, teamwork, ethics, approach to patient needs and lifelong learning) in the scenarios they discussed.
  • Each student was scored by the facilitators using the IPE evaluation form.
  • Each student was given questions prepared for reflection based on the scenario they discussed and asked to submit them to the facilitators as homework within a few hours.
  • In preparation for the next day, all facilitators were provided with the discussion session recordings and students' reflection assignments and were asked to prepare feedback.

    • Third Session: This session was planned in a large group format including students, facilitators, and observers.

The session started with a warm-up chat. A presentation on the outcomes of the discussion were made by the student who had the role of spokesperson in each group.

The facilitators showed the discussion video segments to the whole group and gave feedback by sharing the positive ideas and the ideas that needed to be improved. They presented the content analysis of the student reflection assignments.

At the end of the session, verbal feedback was received from all participants regarding the implementation. Certificates were given to all participants.

The ARCS-V motivation model scales and the RIPLS were administered to the students.

02

Conditions studied

  • Education
  • Professional Role
  • Interprofessional Relations
  • Patient Safety
  • Acceptability of Health Care
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care

Keywords

  • Interprofessional Education
  • ARCS_V Motivational Model
  • Medical Education
  • Health Professionals
  • Action Research
  • ADDIE Insctructional Design
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Izmir Democracy University is the lead sponsor of 73 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • To be a health professional student at the undergraduate level in the Faculty of Dentistry, Medicine and Health Sciences (Nutrition and Dietetics, Nursing, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation) at Izmir Democracy University in Turkey.
  • Voluntarily participate in the training.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being a student at universities other than Izmir Democracy University
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Educational Intervention Group

    Participants in this group included undergraduate healthcare students from the faculties of dentistry, medicine, and health sciences at a higher education institution in Turkey. The group underwent an interprofessional education (IPE) program designed based on the ARCS-V motivational design model. The program consisted of three sessions and was delivered in a hybrid format, incorporating both online and face-to-face elements. Various tactics and strategies from the motivational model were used throughout the training process. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) and the ARCS-V Motivation Scale were administered to assess the students' readiness for interprofessional education and the program's effectiveness. The educational content included scenarios, multimedia elements, messages, emails, reflection assignments, and group tasks, which aimed to enhance students' motivation, interest, and overall learning experience.

    Behavioral: Education

Interventions

  • BehavioralEducation

    An Interprofessional Education Program Based on the ARCS-V Motivation Model on the Theme of "Chronic Disease Management and Patient Safety"

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS)

    The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) was developed by Parsell and Bligh (1999), revised by McFadyen et al. (2005,2009) and adapted to Turkish by Ergönül et al. This scale is a three-dimensional, five-point Likert type scale consisting of 19 items used to measure participants' attitudes towards teamwork and collaboration, professional identity, and roles and responsibilities. According to the literature, a score of 4 and above indicates increased readiness.

    Time frame: 2 days

  2. ARCS-V Motivation Scale

    The study utilized the ARCS-V motivation model alongside the ADDIE instructional design model. ARCS-V Motivation Design Scales, 5-point Likert type scales where higher scores indicate higher motivation, assessed the effectiveness of motivational strategies in the IPE program. Scales Used: Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS): Developed by Keller in 1993 and revised in 2009, this scale has 16 items focusing on attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. Course Interest Survey (CIS): Created by Keller in 1993, it also consists of 16 items, targeting the same four factors as IMMS. Volition For Learning Scale (VFLS): Developed by Keller et al. in 2020, this 13-item scale is two-dimensional, focusing on action planning and action control, reflecting the need for motivation, volition, and self-regulation.

    Time frame: 2 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
    İzmir, Konak 35290, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06525194
Lead sponsor
Izmir Democracy University
Collaborators
Ege University
Responsible party
Aysel Başer (assistant professor dr, Izmir Democracy University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 29, 2024
Start date
Jul 2, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2022
Completion
Jul 3, 2022
Last update
Jul 29, 2024

Study contacts

Aysel Baser, Asst Prof
principal investigator · Izmir Democracy University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion