CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06511466Updated Jul 22, 2024

Belmont Rapid Infuser Education

An observational study in Anesthesia, sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-22.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
115
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Belmont Rapid Infuser (BRI) represents medical equipment with potential to elicit serious injury. The device is used infrequently and at irregular time of day which makes training and competency of operation difficult to ensure. In the investigators institution BRI is used infrequently, usually for pediatric trauma cases and liver transplant cases.

The current teaching module for BRI includes oral slide presentation and live demonstration of BRI assembly and a written test. The effectiveness of this module has never been tested. The investigators central hypothesis is that modified training will significantly increase proficiency rate. The current traditional teaching module is insufficient to retain knowledge and be proficient. The investigators plan to study the current teaching module (traditional test method) to evaluate its effectiveness in acquisition of proficiency and retention of knowledge and skills.

The aims of this study are:

Aim 1. To evaluate the current method of teaching on proficient use of the BRI, Hypothesis: The use of traditional test method is not effective as less than 50% will pass in the first attempt.

Aim 2. Re-design the teaching module if necessary to optimize the method if the current method is found to be inadequate Hypothesis: Restructured test that provides a hand-on training as opposed to only an oral presentation with the traditional test will be associated with a higher pass rate (>80%).

Aim 3. To perform the success with BRI assembly in clinician pairs versus a single clinician.

Hypothesis: Working in pairs is better than working as a single person in setting up the BRI within the recommended time limit.

Aim 4: To better define proficiency with the use of the BRI with respect to retention of knowledge and skills after initial teaching and successful tests.

Hypothesis: Retention at 3 months is required irrespective of the initial training method in order to retain competency. Retention at 3 months will be higher with the restructured training than with the traditional training method.

The investigators will employ a quality improvement methodology invoking a PDSA (Plan-Do-Study Act) ramp to evaluate and improve the training model as necessary.

JHACO requires that all equipment users be trained annually in proper operating procedures for the equipment they use and that the training is documented. The investigators propose that retraining may have to be done more frequently in order to retain knowledge especially when this knowledge is to be used during emergency care of children.

Medical equipment in the OR may be divided into 4 categories based on the frequency of use and risk of injury. BRI belongs to the category of low frequency of use, but high risk of injury. These categories of medical equipment will require different strategies for teaching and training that need to be explored.

If the investigators current teaching module is found to be an effective one, it could be replicated for other types of medical equipment as well as spread to other institutions that use similar equipment.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized non-blinded study. Since the investigators are following a quality improvement methodology, there is only an intervention group and not a control group. All participants will receive the training intervention.

Study participants for phase 1 will include subjects in each of following categories: faculty, certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNA), Registered Nurses and pediatric anesthesia fellows. Participants will be recruited from the Department of Anesthesia with no attention to gender, race, age, or socioeconomic status.

Participants will be tested with the traditional test method as a first step. Based on the outcomes of this test method, a decision would be made to conduct the restructured training. Traditional method is the current method used which involves oral slide presentation followed by demonstration and written test. There will be a video presentation followed by a demonstration by and experienced Anesthesia Tech Restructured training that the investigators are proposing will consist of an oral slide presentation and will follow hands-on assembly and written test. The 'hands-on assembly' will be the new training technique that will be different from the original technique.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia

Keywords

  • Education
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 661 studies on the registry; 132 are open to participants now.

Of its 54 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Anesthesia Faculty, Fellows and CRNA's

Eligibility criteria

Study participants for phase 1 will include subjects in each of following categories: faculty, certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNA), Registered Nurses and pediatric anesthesia fellows. Participants will be recruited from the Department of Anesthesia with no attention to gender, race, age, or socioeconomic status. -

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
115 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proficiency

    Primary outcome: proficiency: composite score of pass - pass on BRI assembly and pass on knowledge test.

    Time frame: July 2013

Secondary outcomes

  1. Retention

    Retention of proficiency at 3 months after delivery of the effective teaching module.

    Time frame: June 2014

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06511466
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 22, 2024
Start date
Feb 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Jun 2023
Last update
Jul 22, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion