CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT06502444MFTUpdated Mar 3, 2025

Moving Forward Together 2.0: An Activity Intervention

An interventional study of Moving Forward Together Activity Intervention in Activity, Motor and Emotion Regulation, sponsored by Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science. Withdrawn at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-03.

Sponsored by Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
An insufficient number of prospective volunteers provided informed consent to provide a fair test of whether the intervention would be effective. More people were needed to make shared online feedback and support a useful component.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The study will test whether an online physical activity program that includes mindfulness can increase activity in women who have been abused by a relationship partner. The study also aims to test whether this intervention can improve their ability to control their emotions and use mindfulness and reduce their stress and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms. The intervention is on the internet and provides participants with informational videos, as well as support and encouragement from other program participants. The intervention aims to encourage participants to choose their own physical activities and also includes components designed to foster healthy regulation of emotion (addressing negative thoughts and feelings that may get in the way of exercise, recognizing accomplishments and rewarding oneself, etc.) This activity intervention is designed to take eight weeks. Participants are tested initially (at baseline), halfway through the program (Week 4) and at the end of the program (Week 8).

Read the detailed description

The proposed design is a single condition, longitudinal pilot study examining the feasibility of using an online physical activity program to increase physical activity and improve emotion regulation in women who have experienced trauma due to experiencing an abusive or harmful relationship. All participants receive the same intervention. The study will be conducted on the online Wix Classroom platform, which is a secure, online platform to which only participants and research staff will have access. Women who have varying levels of trauma, as determined by the PTSD Checklist-Civilian (PCL-C), will be invited to participate in the study via A Safe Place, an organization to help survivors of intimate partner violence. Participants will complete the online program, and are asked to complete assessments at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Though they will not be required to access the program, their continued use of the program after the end of the 8-week program will be examined for 4 additional weeks. The primary aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of the intervention. Descriptive statistics will be conducted to assess participant engagement (i.e., number of logins, video views, and discussion board posts) and satisfaction (i.e., program acceptability questionnaire responses). Feasibility data will help discern what program components participants found most useful. Longitudinal models will be used to examine the effect of program participation on physical activity, mood and emotion regulation, stress levels, and PTSD symptoms over time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Activity, Motor
  • Emotion Regulation

Keywords

  • activity
  • activity intervention
  • Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
  • intimate partner violence
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • Female
  • Reporting a previous relationship with an individual that included abuse or trauma
  • Capable of reading and understanding English
  • Not currently living with the individua
  • Currently involved with A Safe Place in Zion, IL

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women without reliable internet access
  • Individuals already meeting physical activity guidelines (150 minutes of physical activity or more per week)
  • Women who report health problems that make activity unsafe or for whom healthcare professionals believe activity might be unsafe
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Moving Forward Together Activity Intervention

    This is a single-arm project. All participants receive the same experimental intervention. The intervention is a gentle program encouraging greater participation in physical activity and healthy regulation of emotions.

    Behavioral: Moving Forward Together Activity Intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralMoving Forward Together Activity Intervention

    The activity intervention program consists of videos and handouts to encourage participants to access these materials if they wish to increase their physical activity. The program lasts 8 weeks. Participants may access program materials for an additional four weeks after the program ends

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire

    A 16-item measure of physical activity participation / sedentary behavior across three settings. We will assess whether participants engage in 150 minutes or more of leisure time physical activity per week. Those who do are ineligible for this study.

    Time frame: This measure is completed at baseline and at the eight-week assessment

  2. Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian (PCL-C):

    The PCL-C is a 17-item validated measure used to assess the intensity and severity of symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Each of the items is scored 1 to 5, so scores range from 17 to 85; higher scores indicate more symptoms of PTSD.

    Time frame: This measure is completed at baseline and at the 4-week and 8-week assessment

  3. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)

    The PANAS is a 20-item method for assessing both positive and negative affect. The Positive and Negative Affect Scales contain ten items each. Items are scored 1 to 5, so total subscale scores range from 10 to 50, where higher scores indicate greater levels of positive or negative emotion.

    Time frame: This measure is completed at baseline and at the 8-week assessment

  4. Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)

    The ERQ is a 10-item measure used to assess participants' habitual use of two emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal (5 items) and expressive suppression (5 items). Scores on each item range from 1 to 7, so the range of subscale scores is 5 to 35, where higher scores indicate greater reliance on reappraisal or suppression.

    Time frame: This measure is completed at baseline, at the 4-week, and at the 8-week assessment.

  5. Program acceptability measure.

    This 32-item measure assesses participants' experience of the online program. Participants also self-report their use of the different intervention components and the extent to which they found each component useful. There are 26 questions about participants' satisfaction with the program scored from 1 to 5. Scores will range from 1 to 150 where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. There are also three questions about frequency of using different program features (scored from 0 to 6; range = 0 to 18; higher scores indicate greater frequency of using program elements. There is one question assessing the number of activity program units participants watched (ranging from 0 to 8, where a higher score indicates greater use of program material). There are 2 questions about participants' interest in continuing to access program materials. No scores will be computed from these questions.

    Time frame: This measure is only completed at the 8-week assessment.

  6. Physical activity progress.

    Participants will be asked to share their physical activity tracking for each of the eight weeks of the program by reporting on their daily minutes of physical activity using a provided worksheet.

    Time frame: This measure is completed weekly for eight weeks

  7. Affect Grid (Russell et al., 1989).

    This single item measure assesses both activation and valence associated with emotional response. Participants will be asked to report their current emotional state on a 9 X 9 grid that provides information about the valence of their emotional state (from extremeley unpleasant to extremely pleasant) and the intensity (or arousal) of their emotional state (from extreme sleepiness to extreme arousal). Participants' grid choices can be scored as self-ratings of affective valence and intensity on a scale that ranges from 1 to 9 in each case. In short, valence and intensity scores will range from 1 to 9 each week, where higher scores indicate more positive feelings and more intense feelings, respectively.

    Time frame: This measure is completed weekly for eight weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale assesses the level of stress partcipants perceive in their lives. Each item is scored 0 to 4, so total scores can range from 0 to 40, where higher scores indicate reports of greater perceived stress.

    Time frame: This measure is completed at baseline, at the 4-week, and at the 8-week assessment.

  2. Online program use

    Data from the online program will be extracted to track participants' use of the online program. Number of logins, number of video views, and number and content from discussion board posts will be extracted for each week of the online program, and during the 4 weeks the program website remains open after the 8-week program has ended

    Time frame: Online program use is tracked separately for the eight-week program and for the four weeks following the end of the program

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
    North Chicago, Illinois 60064, United States
  • A Safe Place
    Zion, Illinois 60099, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Cohen S, Williamson, G. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan, S, Oskamp, S, ed. The social psychology of health: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988:31-57. www.cmu.edu/dietrich/psychology/stress-immunity-disease-lab/scales/pdf/cohen,-s.--williamson,-g.-1988.pdf
  • Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348. PubMed 12916575 ↗
  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. PubMed 3397865 ↗
  • Bull FC, Maslin TS, Armstrong T. Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Act Health. 2009 Nov;6(6):790-804. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.6.790. PubMed 20101923 ↗
  • Neumann CS, Pardini D. Factor structure and construct validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy (SRP) scale and the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory (YPI) in young men. J Pers Disord. 2014 Jun;28(3):419-33. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2012_26_063. Epub 2012 Sep 17. PubMed 22984856 ↗
  • Karstoft KI, Andersen SB, Bertelsen M, Madsen T. Diagnostic accuracy of the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist-civilian version in a representative military sample. Psychol Assess. 2014 Mar;26(1):321-5. doi: 10.1037/a0034889. Epub 2013 Nov 4. PubMed 24188155 ↗
  • Russell JA, Weiss A, Mendelsohn, GA. Affect grid: A single item scale of pleasure and activation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989; 57, 493-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.493

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data collected in this study will not be shared with researchers outside of the identified research personnel.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06502444
Lead sponsor
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Responsible party
David Kosson (Professor, retired, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2024
Completion
Nov 20, 2024
Last update
Mar 3, 2025

Study contacts

David Kosson, PhD
principal investigator · Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Steven Miller, PhD
principal investigator · Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion