CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06490419Updated Jul 9, 2024

Effect of Ultrasound Cavitation Versus Electrolipolysis on Obese Infertile Women With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

An interventional study of Electrolipolysis and ultrasound cavitation in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-09.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2024, 1 year 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to determine the difference between the effect of ultrasound cavitation and electrolipolysis on obese infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is the most prevalent endocrinopathy among women during reproductive age . PCOS affects 5-10% of women in reproductive age. It has an effect on quality of life , fertility and pregnancy.

Obesity plays a significant role in reproductive disorders, particularly in women. It is associated with anovulation, menstrual disorders, infertility, difficulties in assisted reproduction, miscarriage, and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

The treatment of obesity and infertility causes some harm to women, due to the danger of some operations and medications other than the high cost of these operations, so it is necessary to use a therapeutic alternative that is non invasive, with lower risk and lower cost.

Both ultrasound cavitation (UC) and electrolipolysis are non invasive modalities with many positive effects on obesity and PCOS outcomes. The effect of both the UC and electrolipolysis has been separately investigated in previous studies. Though, no studies were found to compare the effect of both modalities in the management of infertile women with PCOS. Therefore, this study will be conducted to explore the effect of UC versus electrolipolysis on infertile women with PCOS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
03

In context

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

944 studies on the registry are indexed under Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; 174 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 70 across 685 interventional studies indexed under Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Browse Polycystic Ovary Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Infertile married PCOS women, diagnosed by Rotterdam criteria .
  • Their ages will be ranged between 25-35 year old.
  • Their BMI will be ranged from 30-40 kg/ m2.
  • Their waist/hip ratio equal to or more than 0.85

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Thyroid dysfunction (hypothyroidism).
  • Chronic and/or systemic illnesses (e.g. diabetes mellitus, liver, renal respiratory failure and cardiovascular disorders).
  • Malignant tumors.
  • Tubal adhesions as well as uterine abnormalities.
  • Skin diseases in the abdominal and gluteal regions.
  • Conditions that may prevent the use of electrical stimulation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    electrolipolysis group

    The participants will be treated by electrolipolysis, in addition to the low-caloric diet of 1200 kcal/day.

    Device: Electrolipolysis

  • Experimental
    ultrasound cavitation group

    The participants will be treated by ultrasound cavitation, in addition to the low-caloric diet of 1200 kcal/day.

    Device: ultrasound cavitation

Interventions

  • DeviceElectrolipolysis

    Hypocaloric diet: All patients were prescribed balanced hypocaloric diet (1200 kcal/day) by the nutrition specialist, with physiological nutrient content: carbohydrates-50%, proteins-20%, fats-30% and fiber daily consumption of 30 - 40 g in dry form (grain and vegetables). Calorie distribution: breakfast-40%, lunch-40%, dinner-20%. Behavioral therapy to correct eating disorders: diary of food and lifestyle, motivational phone calls every week Electrolipolysis: the participants will receive electrolipolysis applied to abdomen, thigh and gluteal regions, 3 sessions/week, for 3 months, 60 minutes/session; 30 minutes on the abdomen and thigh and 30 minutes on gluteal region. the device will be set to cause a contraction for 4 seconds followed by a relaxation for 4 seconds with a pulse width of 400 microseconds and a frequency of 20 pulses per minute.

  • Deviceultrasound cavitation

    Hypocaloric diet: All patients were prescribed balanced hypocaloric diet (1200 kcal/day) by the nutrition specialist, as in the electrolipolysis group. ultrasound cavitation (UC): The participants will be treated by UC on the abdomen for 30 minutes, two sessions per week for 3 months. From standing position, the abdominal area of each patient will be divided transversally into 3 parts; part I: from the xiphoid process to 3 cm above the umbilicus, part II: from 3cm above the umbilicus to 2 cm below the umbilicus and part III: from 2 cm below the umbilicus to the pubic bone. Vertically, each part will be divided into right and left segments in relation to the linea alba, forming a total of 6 abdominal segments. The program of cavitation; frequency (40 kHz) will be chosen, the time will be adjusted at 30 minutes. The cavitational head will be, then, moved very slowly on each abdominal segment in a small circular movement for 5 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Weight, height and BMI measurements

    Weight/ height scale will be used to measure the weight and height of all females in both groups to calculate their BMI before and after treatment according to the following equation BMI = weight/height2 (kg/ m2)

    Time frame: within 3 months

  2. Waist hip Ratio

    To accurately measure central obesity, waist/hip ratio will be measured by tape measurement. Waist circumference will be measured at the narrowest portion of the torso approximately midway between the lower costal margin and the iliac crest. The hip circumference will be measured over the widest portion of the gluteal and greater trochanteric region then the ratio between them will be calculated. Reference of female measurements for central obesity will be a waist circumference of \>88 cm and a waist-hip ratio \>0.85.

    Time frame: within 3 months

  3. LH/ FSH Ratio

    ELISA kites will be used for assessing serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) to calculate LH/ FSH ratio. Blood samples will be drawn from antecubital vein of each patient before and after treatment. It will be centrifuged within 2 hours after withdrawal. Serum will be stared at -20°C and assayed for LH/ FSH Ratio. They will be measured in the third day of the menstrual cycle but will be measured in the luteal phase

    Time frame: within 3 months

  4. Ovulation rate

    Abdominal ultrasongraphy will be used to assess ovarian volume before and after treatment for measuring ovulation rate. A minimum of 12 follicles with a diameter of 2 to 9 mm in each ovary, as well as a rising ovarian volume with a minimum size of 10 mm, are the criteria required for an ultrasound diagnosis of defective ovulation

    Time frame: within 3 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06490419
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Hend Ahmed Hassan (Principal investigator, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 8, 2024
Start date
Jul 10, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 10, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 9, 2024

Study contacts

Hend Hassan, Master
Contact
alfatimiaclinic@gmail.com
+2 01064009189
Mahitab Yosri, PHD
Contact
lilmahy_2010@hotmail.com
+2 01222606996
Afaf Botla, PHD
study director · Cairo University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion