ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06488365CytophoneUpdated Mar 11, 2025

In Vivo Liquid Biopsy of Melanoma (Cytophone)

An interventional study of Cytophone in Melanoma, Circulating Tumor Cells and Metastatic Melanoma, sponsored by Cytoastra. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-11.

Sponsored by Cytoastra · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2026, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Cytophone is a first in the world patented system to identify and count single circulating melanoma cells in blood circulation inside the human body. The Cytophone has a unique capability to find rare melanoma cells in the blood by an assessment of 100-500 times greater amounts of blood volume than routine blood tests. The important benefit of the Cytophone diagnosis is that the test does not require injection or any skin incision (i.e., non-invasiveness). The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate evidence of the capability of the Cytophone test to indicate a risk of metastasis and define CTC counts that correlate with melanoma recurrence, progression of metastatic disease, and therapy efficacy. The investigators believe that clinical trials will provide evidence that the Cytophone can diagnose risk of melanoma metastasis and recurrence earlier than existing methods.

Read the detailed description

The majority of melanoma deaths are associated with metastasis that are formed by cancer cells shedding from the primary tumor that enter the circulation and spread to distant organs via blood circulation. These cells in blood are referred to as circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Growing evidence suggests that metastasis is an early event in melanoma patients, often occurring before metastases are clinically detectable. Therefore, detection of CTCs using liquid biopsy assays should be considered as an effective tool to diagnose early the risk of metastasis progression. Taking into account the link of CTCs with metastasis, CTCs have an advantage over many other biomarkers in identifying patients for early therapeutic intervention at a stage when the disease is still manageable and possibly curable. Overall, CTCs are in the blood circulation in early stage disease, yet they are typically detected in later stage disease. Currently, the main issue restricting the use of CTCs for early melanoma detection relates to the low sensitivity of existing assays due to assessment of limited blood volume (i.e., blood samples in vitro). To maximize the blood volume available for analysis, in vivo CTC enumeration without labelling in a large blood volume using the Cytophone device was developed by our team. The Cytophone represents a photoacoustic (PA) flow cytometry (PAFC) diagnostic platform. Our feasibility clinical study has demonstrated the detection of CTCs in 49 of 50 melanoma patients (sensitivity 98%) and in 0 of 18 in healthy subjects (control group). The investigators received clinical evidence of the Cytophone's capability to diagnose 0.001 CTCs/mL which is significantly higher than sensitivity of existing testing methodologies. This threshold of the sensitivity is 130-times better than the sensitivity of the in vitro CellSearch (Menarini) assay which is only assay approved by FDA for clinical testing of CTCs (1 CTC in 7.5 mL; 0.13 CTCs/mL).

The Goal of this clinical study is to determine whether the Cytophone can be used for in vivo detection and enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the melanoma patients at different disease stages with focus on early diagnosis, early assessment of disease recurrence and monitoring of therapy efficiency. It is expected that the detection limit of CTCs will be improved at least an order of magnitude compared to the detection limits of existing methods. The test results are intended to use in conjunction with other clinical diagnostic methods.

The investigators hypothesize that our CTC assay, in vivo, provides earlier, rapid and more accurate diagnosis and prognosis of metastasis progression in melanoma patients. To achieve our goal, the investigators will accomplish the following primary and secondary objectives:

The primary objectives:

  1. Obtain evidence that a positive Cytophone CTC test indicates a risk of metastasis development.
  2. Define thresholds of CTC counts that correlate with melanoma recurrence and progression of metastatic disease.

The secondary objective:

  1. Determine if the Cytophone diagnoses the risk of melanoma metastasis progression and recurrence earlier than existing methods.
02

Conditions studied

  • Melanoma
  • Circulating Tumor Cells
  • Metastatic Melanoma
  • Diagnosis

Keywords

  • melanoma
  • circulating tumor cells (CTCs)
  • in vivo liquid biopsy
  • metastasis
  • diagnosis and prognosis
03

In context

Melanoma

3,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 578 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 40 across 2,649 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.

Browse Melanoma studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Cytoastra as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histological documented diagnosis of melanoma;
  • Participants having provided with signature on informed consent form: the informed consent process should be complete with full discussion of all requirements and possible risks;
  • Must be able to sit for up to 60 minutes.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide to participate in the study, such as a mental condition rendering the participant unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study;
  • cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological (e.g., evidence of organic brain syndrome), endocrine, or other major systemic disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult or that would put the participant at risk by participating in the study;
  • Persistent significant or severe infection, either acute or chronic;
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women or those who plan to become pregnant during the study;
  • Women of not protected by effective method of birth control and/or who are unwilling or unable to be tested for pregnancy;
  • Any known history of severe preexisting constipation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cytophone application

    It is anticipated that Cytophone diagnostic procedure will start with 30-min preparation including ultrasound imaging of an examined vessel, photo of a skin area above the vessel and quick navigation of the PAFC probe on the vessel using near-infrared viewer. After completion, the Cytophone monitoring will be conducted for 30-60 min and will include noninvasive irradiation of the vessel by a laser beam(s) using a safe for human laser energy level.

    Device: Cytophone

Interventions

  • DeviceCytophone

    The Cytophone clinical prototype incorporates two pulse lasers, optical system for delivery of laser light to the skin, ultrasound transducer array and detection electronics for acquisition of acoustic waves from CTCs. Parameters of lasers: C-Wedge 1064 (Bright Solutions, Cura Carpignano (PV), Italy): Wavelength,1064 nm; pulse width, 0.6 ns; pulse rate: 1 kHz; pulse energy, 240 μJ. C-Wedge 18901 (Bright Solutions, Cura Carpignano (PV), Italy): Wavelength, 770 nm; pulse width 3 ns; pulse rate, 1 kHz; pulse energy, 240 μJ. Detection of acoustic waves from CTCs is performing by a focused ultrasound transducer array placed in an acoustic contact with the skin of the subject with ultrasound gel. The signals from the transducers are amplified with a 16 channel amplifier, then digitized by a 12-bit, 500 MSPS high speed board digitizer (ATS9350, AlazarTech, Canada). This information is then transferred to a data recording system using a secure computer.

    Also known as: Photoacoustiv flow cytometry (PAFC) in vivo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Identify and count CTCs in blood in vivo

    Link CTC counts with early melanoma progression and recurrence efficacy

    Time frame: nine months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • SSM Health Dean Medical Group Specialty Services
    Madison, Wisconsin 53715, United States
    Recruiting
    • Lisa Lepeak, MD · Contact
    • Lisa Lepeak, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Galanzha EI, Shashkov EV, Spring PM, Suen JY, Zharov VP. In vivo, noninvasive, label-free detection and eradication of circulating metastatic melanoma cells using two-color photoacoustic flow cytometry with a diode laser. Cancer Res. 2009 Oct 15;69(20):7926-34. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4900. Epub 2009 Oct 13. PubMed 19826056 ↗
  • Galanzha EI, Zharov VP. Circulating Tumor Cell Detection and Capture by Photoacoustic Flow Cytometry in Vivo and ex Vivo. Cancers (Basel). 2013 Dec 10;5(4):1691-738. doi: 10.3390/cancers5041691. PubMed 24335964 ↗
  • Galanzha EI, Menyaev YA, Yadem AC, Sarimollaoglu M, Juratli MA, Nedosekin DA, Foster SR, Jamshidi-Parsian A, Siegel ER, Makhoul I, Hutchins LF, Suen JY, Zharov VP. In vivo liquid biopsy using Cytophone platform for photoacoustic detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with melanoma. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jun 12;11(496):eaat5857. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat5857. Erratum In: Sci Transl Med. 2019 Sep 18;11(510):eaaz4393. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz4393. PubMed 31189720 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2026, 12 months after the start.

Of 227 interventional studies with no phase under Melanoma, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 28, 2024
First posted
Jul 5, 2024
StartActual
Feb 11, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Feb 11, 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
Mar 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06488365
Lead sponsor
Cytoastra
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 5, 2024
Start date
Feb 11, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 11, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 11, 2025

Study contacts

James Golleher, MBA
Contact
jgolleher@cytoastra.com
5017658175
Ekaterina Galanzha, PhD
study director · Cytoastra

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion