CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06485869VIRONSCAREUpdated Jul 3, 2024

Impact of Virtual Reality on the Quality of Life of Oncology Patients

An interventional study of Measure the improvement in quality of life and Measure the level of satisfaction of patients and nursing staff in Cancer, sponsored by Central Hospital Saint Quentin. Recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-03.

Sponsored by Central Hospital Saint Quentin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Anxiety, nausea and vomiting are common side effects in paediatric patients receiving chemotherapy. chemotherapy. New evidence supports the efficacy of immersive virtual reality in improving symptoms of anxiety and distress, including nausea and vomiting, in this vulnerable group. This research will evaluate the efficacy of virtual reality in managing anxiety, nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving their first line of chemotherapy and will also measure the quality of life of these patients and evaluate patient and nursing staff satisfaction

Read the detailed description

For cancer patients, virtual reality proved more effective than other forms of distraction in relieving anxiety, depression and fatigue during chemotherapy. Although pain and anxiety in cancer patients are managed proactively, this study was designed to measure the quality of life of these patients, assess patient and carer satisfaction, evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality in reducing anxiety during the first three sessions of chemotherapy, and assess the impact of virtual reality on preventive and acute chemotherapy-induced fatigue, nausea and vomiting.

This is a clinical study with a therapeutic aim using a non-medicinal, interventional, prospective, multi-centre, controlled and randomised technique, with two parallel groups. It is clinical research involving the human person category 2, involving only minimal risks and constraints. The two arms are Arm A: study questionnaires with virtual reality (VR) Arm B: study questionnaires without virtual reality, standard care (SC)

A visit will be made during the 3 cycles of chemotherapy during which arm A will be immersed in Virtual Reality with the Healthy Mind VR programme.

programme, and patients in arm B will receive standard care without hypnotic support.

There will also be a pre-inclusion visit 7 days before the first cycle. and visits at 3, 6 and 9 months after the 3 cycles of chemotherapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Chemotherapy-naive patient
  • Patient with first-line indication for intravenous cyclic chemotherapy
  • Affiliated to a social security system
  • Having received full information on the organization of the research and having given free, informed and written consent signed by the participant and the investigator
  • Patient understands French or English
  • Expected duration of chemotherapy session for the first 3 cycles greater than 30 minutes

Exclusion criteria

exclusion criteria :

  • Patient with communication disorders preventing informed consent
  • Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice)
  • Patients suffering from epilepsy
  • Severe visual or hearing impairment preventing use of headphones
  • Psychiatric pathologies such as delusional disorders, hallucinations or schizophrenia.
  • Patients with infections or facial wounds
  • Patients with severe claustrophobia
  • Patients with pacemakers
  • Patients with known cognitive or learning problems,
  • Patients with brain tumors or metastases,
  • Patients suffering from motion sickness
  • Expected duration of chemotherapy session for the first 3 cycles of 30 minutes or less.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    With virtual reality session

    Arm A patients will benefit from a 20-minute virtual reality session per chemotherapy session, for the first 3 cycles, with each session lasting more than 30 minutes.

    Other: Measure the improvement in quality of life · Other: Measure the level of satisfaction of patients and nursing staff · Other: Measurement of anxiety and pain · Other: Measurement of depressive state · Other: measuring fatigue levels · Other: measurement of acute nausea and vomiting

  • Other
    Without virtual reality session

    Patients in arm B will receive conventional care without hypnotic support.

    Other: Measure the improvement in quality of life · Other: Measure the level of satisfaction of patients and nursing staff · Other: Measurement of anxiety and pain · Other: Measurement of depressive state · Other: measuring fatigue levels · Other: measurement of acute nausea and vomiting

Interventions

  • OtherMeasure the improvement in quality of life

    Improvment of quality of life is measured by the QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire

  • OtherMeasure the level of satisfaction of patients and nursing staff

    Patient satisfaction is measured using a five-point scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate higher levels of satisfaction.

  • OtherMeasurement of anxiety and pain

    Anxiety and pain is measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This measurement is complemented by physiological responses to anxiety, measured by heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure (HR and BP)

  • OtherMeasurement of depressive state

    Depressive State is measured by HAD score

  • Othermeasuring fatigue levels

    Fatigue levels is measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

  • Othermeasurement of acute nausea and vomiting

    acute nausea and vomiting is measured by MASCC Antiemesis Tool (MAT)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. QLQ-C30

    Measurement of the quality of life observed in patients. The QLQ-C30 questionnaire consists of 30 questions on the patient's state of physical and mental health. There are 28 questions with scores ranging from 1 = not at all to 4= very much and two questions with scores ranging from 1= very poor to 7= excellent.

    Time frame: at the start of cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days); 3,6,9 months post chemo, at the beginning of the 3rd month post chemo, at the beginning of the 6th month post chemo and at the beginning of the 9th month post chemo

  2. Measuring patient and nurse satisfaction with the chemotherapy procedure

    Use of a patient questionnaire with a 10-point scale assessed on a five-point scale ranging from 1=strongly disagree disagree to 5 = strongly agree

    Time frame: after the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1 and 3 (each cycle lasts 28 days)

  3. MAT

    Assessment of acute nausea and vomiting in patients induced by chemotherapy. 4 questions are used to assess nausea and vomiting 24 hours after chemotherapy and these 4 questions are again used to assess late nausea and vomiting. There are 2 questions with a yes or no choice, 1 question with a numerical answer and 1 question with a 10-point numerical scale with 0= none and 10= maximum difficulty.

    Time frame: after the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 2 and 3 (each cycle lasts 28 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. VAS Score

    Measures patients' anxiety and pain levels, as well as their fatigue levels. This questionnaire consists of 4 questions on pain levels, anxiety, fatigue and satisfaction with treatment. It is administered before and after chemotherapy. A 10-point numerical scale is used, with 0= the minimum and 10 =the maximum.

    Time frame: Before the start of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days) and after the end of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days).

  2. Heart rate

    Measurement of heart rate in bpm. To assess the patient's level of anxiety and pain. Use of a multiparametric monitor. It will be collected before and after virtual reality.

    Time frame: Before the start of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days) and after the end of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days).

  3. Blood pressure

    Measurement of blood pressure in mmHg. To assess the patient's level of anxiety and pain. Use of a multiparametric monitor. It will be collected before and after virtual reality.

    Time frame: Before the start of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days) and after the end of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days).

  4. HAD Score

    Assessment of the patient's state of depression and anxiety. There are 14 questions with scores ranging from 0 to 3 and different answer choices depending on the type of question.

    Time frame: Before the start of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days) and after the end of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1 and 2 (each cycle is 28 days).

06

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier de Chauny
    Chauny, 02300, France
    Recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier de Saint Quentin
    Saint-Quentin, 02100, France
    • Frédérique DR Roussel · Contact
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PubMed 33538338 ↗
  • Colonna M, Boussari O, Cowppli-Bony A, Delafosse P, Romain G, Grosclaude P, Jooste V; French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM). Time trends and short term projections of cancer prevalence in France. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;56:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 17. PubMed 30125884 ↗
  • Carnio S, Galetta D, Scotti V, Cortinovis DL, Antonuzzo A, Pisconti S, Rossi A, Martelli O, Cecere FL, Lunghi A, Del Conte A, Montagna ES, Topulli J, Pelizzoni D, Rapetti SG, Gianetta M, Pacchiana MV, Pegoraro V, Cataldo N, Bria E, Novello S. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with advanced lung cancer during the first-line treatment: assessment by physicians, nurses, and patients from an Italian multicenter survey. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jun;26(6):1841-1849. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-4004-1. Epub 2017 Dec 21. PubMed 29270827 ↗
  • Schneider SM, Workman ML. Effects of virtual reality on symptom distress in children receiving chemotherapy. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1999;2(2):125-34. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1999.2.125. PubMed 19178248 ↗
  • Chan A, Kim HK, Hsieh RK, Yu S, de Lima Lopes G Jr, Su WC, Banos A, Bhatia S, Burke TA, Keefe DM. Incidence and predictors of anticipatory nausea and vomiting in Asia Pacific clinical practice--a longitudinal analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jan;23(1):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2375-0. Epub 2014 Aug 13. PubMed 25112561 ↗
  • Molassiotis A, Lee PH, Burke TA, Dicato M, Gascon P, Roila F, Aapro M. Anticipatory Nausea, Risk Factors, and Its Impact on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Results From the Pan European Emesis Registry Study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jun;51(6):987-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.317. Epub 2016 Feb 16. PubMed 26891606 ↗
  • Morrow GR, Roscoe JA, Kirshner JJ, Hynes HE, Rosenbluth RJ. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting in the era of 5-HT3 antiemetics. Support Care Cancer. 1998 May;6(3):244-7. doi: 10.1007/s005200050161. PubMed 9629877 ↗
  • Dupuis LL, Sung L, Molassiotis A, Orsey AD, Tissing W, van de Wetering M. 2016 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: Prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):323-331. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3384-y. Epub 2016 Aug 26. PubMed 27565788 ↗
  • Huertas-Fernandez MJ, Martinez-Bautista MJ, Sanchez-Martinez I, Zarzuela-Ramirez M, Baena-Canada JM. [Analysis of the effectiveness of an antiemetic protocol used in an oncology division]. Farm Hosp. 2010 May-Jun;34(3):125-38. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2009.11.001. Spanish. PubMed 20206564 ↗
  • Hesketh PJ. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 5;358(23):2482-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706547. No abstract available. PubMed 18525044 ↗
  • Birnie KA, Noel M, Parker JA, Chambers CT, Uman LS, Kisely SR, McGrath PJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of distraction and hypnosis for needle-related pain and distress in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Sep;39(8):783-808. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu029. Epub 2014 Jun 2. PubMed 24891439 ↗
  • Vol H, Flank J, Lavoratore SR, Nathan PC, Taylor T, Zelunka E, Maloney AM, Lee Dupuis L. Poor chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting control in children receiving intermediate or high dose methotrexate. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Mar;24(3):1365-71. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2924-1. Epub 2015 Sep 3. PubMed 26335406 ↗
  • Ovayolu N, Ovayolu O, Serce S, Tuna D, Pirbudak Cocelli L, Sevinc A. Pain and quality of life in Turkish cancer patients. Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Dec;15(4):437-43. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12047. Epub 2013 Mar 11. PubMed 23480371 ↗
  • Ahmed RL, Prizment A, Lazovich D, Schmitz KH, Folsom AR. Lymphedema and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: the Iowa Women's Health Study. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5689-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4731. Epub 2008 Nov 10. PubMed 19001331 ↗
  • Dupuis LL, Robinson PD, Boodhan S, Holdsworth M, Portwine C, Gibson P, Phillips R, Maan C, Stefin N, Sung L; Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario. Guideline for the prevention and treatment of anticipatory nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy in pediatric cancer patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Aug;61(8):1506-12. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25063. Epub 2014 Apr 17. PubMed 24753095 ↗
  • Chirico A, Lucidi F, De Laurentiis M, Milanese C, Napoli A, Giordano A. Virtual Reality in Health System: Beyond Entertainment. A Mini-Review on the Efficacy of VR During Cancer Treatment. J Cell Physiol. 2016 Feb;231(2):275-87. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25117. PubMed 26238976 ↗
  • Wong CL, Ip WY, Kwok BMC, Choi KC, Ng BKW, Chan CWH. Effects of therapeutic play on children undergoing cast-removal procedures: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 5;8(7):e021071. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021071. PubMed 29980545 ↗
  • Chan CW, Lam LW, Li CK, Cheung JS, Cheng KK, Chik KW, Chan HY, So WK, Tang WP. Feasibility of psychoeducational interventions in managing chemotherapy-associated nausea and vomiting (CANV) in pediatric oncology patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Apr;19(2):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Oct 25. PubMed 25445732 ↗
  • Rutter CE, Dahlquist LM, Weiss KE. Sustained efficacy of virtual reality distraction. J Pain. 2009 Apr;10(4):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.09.016. Epub 2009 Feb 23. PubMed 19231295 ↗
  • Schneider SM, Kisby CK, Flint EP. Effect of virtual reality on time perception in patients receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Apr;19(4):555-64. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0852-7. Epub 2010 Mar 26. PubMed 20336327 ↗
  • Schneider SM, Hood LE. Virtual reality: a distraction intervention for chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 Jan;34(1):39-46. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.39-46. PubMed 17562631 ↗
  • Schneider SM, Workman ML. Virtual reality as a distraction intervention for older children receiving chemotherapy. Pediatr Nurs. 2000 Nov-Dec;26(6):593-7. PubMed 12026359 ↗
  • Karaman D, Erol F, Yilmaz D, Dikmen Y. Investigation of the effect of the virtual reality application on experimental pain severity in healthy. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Mar;65(3):446-451. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.446. Epub 2019 Apr 11. PubMed 30994846 ↗
  • Zeng Y, Zhang JE, Cheng ASK, Cheng H, Wefel JS. Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Virtual Reality-Based Interventions in Cancer-Related Symptom Management. Integr Cancer Ther. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1534735419871108. doi: 10.1177/1534735419871108. PubMed 31441352 ↗
  • Bani Mohammad E, Ahmad M. Virtual reality as a distraction technique for pain and anxiety among patients with breast cancer: A randomized control trial. Palliat Support Care. 2019 Feb;17(1):29-34. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000639. Epub 2018 Sep 10. PubMed 30198451 ↗
  • Chirico A, Maiorano P, Indovina P, Milanese C, Giordano GG, Alivernini F, Iodice G, Gallo L, De Pietro G, Lucidi F, Botti G, De Laurentiis M, Giordano A. Virtual reality and music therapy as distraction interventions to alleviate anxiety and improve mood states in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy. J Cell Physiol. 2020 Jun;235(6):5353-5362. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29422. Epub 2020 Jan 20. PubMed 31957873 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — the data will be collected on an electronic Ecrf, a single extraction is planned by the protocol, all the collected data will be analyzed centrally by the study cordernator,no data sharing is planned in the study

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06485869
Lead sponsor
Central Hospital Saint Quentin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 3, 2024
Start date
Nov 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 29, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 29, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 3, 2024

Study contacts

Frédérique Mm Roussel
Contact
f.roussel@ch-stquentin.fr
0323067901
Abdelkrim Mr Boulanouar
Contact
ak.boulanouar@ch-stquentin.fr
0323067886
Frédérique Mm Roussel
principal investigator · CH Saint-Quentin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion