ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06479551Updated Jun 28, 2024

Comparative Effects of High and Moderate Intensity Resistance Training in Young Football Players

An interventional study of high intensity-low volume resistance training and Moderate intensity-high volume resistance training in Sports Physical Therapy, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 24 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-28.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2023, registered Jun 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Football playing is an intermittent sport requiring high intensity dynamic movements, such as acceleration, sprinting and jumping. Higher levels of strength and power are crucial for young football players. Overuse includes using a muscle too much, too soon before warming up, or too often in gym, Tension or stress can cause muscle soreness. DOMS is thought to be due to temporary muscle damage and inflammation for which the most common trigger appears to be eccentric exercises. Exercise induced muscle damage DOMS is considered a type1 muscle strain injury that has a pain free period of one day. Muscle soreness peaks between one to two days. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of high intensity-low volume (HRT) versus moderate intensity-high volume resistance training (MRT) on strength, power and muscle soreness in young football players.

Study will be a randomized clinical trial, conduct at Pakistan football federation Lahore through convenient sampling techniques. Sample size will be calculated by using G-power. Randomization will be done by Lottery method. Participants will be divided into two groups. Group A will receive High intensity resistance training and Group B will receive moderate intensity resistance training Strength will be calculated by 1RM and sprint test . Power will be measured by vertical and horizontal jump. Muscle soreness and fatigue will be measured by Hooper and MacKinnon questionnaire. Data will be analyzed by SPSS version 25

Read the detailed description

The objective of my study is to compare the effects of high and moderate intensity resistance training on strength, power and muscle soreness in young football players

02

Conditions studied

  • Sports Physical Therapy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Footballer
  • Muscle soreness
  • Power
  • Resistance Training
  • Sprint
03

In context

Myalgia

288 studies on the registry are indexed under Myalgia; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 44 across 245 interventional studies indexed under Myalgia.

Browse Myalgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,176 studies on the registry; 637 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female players

    • Age 18-24yrs
    • Player with minimum 1-year experience of football
    • Muscle soreness value shouldn't be below normal.
    • Value on Hooper and Mackinnon Questionnaire should be from 1-3.
    • A minimum score of 3-4 in lower extremity functional scale
    • Fatigue shouldn't regress the normal.(45)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of lower limb musculoskeletal injuries in last 3months

    • Fracture since last 6months
    • Taking drugs or ergogenic supplement
    • Neurological systems are not intact(dermatomes and myotomes)
    • A minimum score of in lower extremity functional scale.(65, 66)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group: A

    13 participants will be in experimental group giving them High intensity-low volume resistance training protocol of 4 reps and 2 sets comprising 90% of 1 RM parallel back squats for six weeks measure all values before giving them protocol and after protocol.

    Other: high intensity-low volume resistance training

  • Experimental
    Control Group: B

    13 participants will be in control group giving them moderate intensity-high volume resistance training training protocol of 8 reps and 3 sets comprising 80% of 1 RM parallel back squats for six weeks measure all values before giving them protocol and after protocol.

    Other: Moderate intensity-high volume resistance training

Interventions

  • Otherhigh intensity-low volume resistance training

    13 participants will be in experimental group giving them High intensity-low volume resistance training protocol of 4 reps and 2 sets comprising 90% of 1 RM parallel back squats for six weeks measure all values before giving them protocol and after protocol.

  • OtherModerate intensity-high volume resistance training

    13 participants will be in control group giving them Moderate intensity-high volume resistance training of 8 reps and 3 sets comprising 80% of 1 RM parallel back squats for six weeks measure all values before giving them protocol and after protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hooper and Mackinnon Questionnaire

    This questionnaire was used to measure muscle soreness and fatigue .It comprised of five Questions covering fatigue, sleep,level of muscle soreness and psychological well-being. were measured before and after the intervention session ,with reliability of 0.86 with minimum measurement error it had a strong construct validity.(67)

    Time frame: six weeks

  2. Vertical and Horizontal Jump

    It is a common test used to gauge athletic performance as well as an exercise for increasing strength and endurance. Athletes compete in the track and field long jump, which tests their strength, speed, and agility as they try to jump as far as they can from a takeoff point. Horizontal jump has reliability of 0.90(0.00) and vertical jump has reliability of 0.86(0.00) will be exhibiting refined concurrent validity.(68)

    Time frame: six weeks

  3. 1RM, Sprint Test

    Its reliability was of (ICC 0.90:CV 4.0%) measurement error 5.1 kg and ICC 0.96, measurement error 3.2 kg, respectively) was resulting with good construct validity. hese assessments are frequently used to evaluate an athlete's performance and monitor their development over time in athletic and fitness contexts.

    Time frame: six weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pakistan football federation Lahore
    Lahore, Punjab Province 5400, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Currier BS, Mcleod JC, Banfield L, Beyene J, Welton NJ, D'Souza AC, Keogh JAJ, Lin L, Coletta G, Yang A, Colenso-Semple L, Lau KJ, Verboom A, Phillips SM. Resistance training prescription for muscle strength and hypertrophy in healthy adults: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2023 Sep;57(18):1211-1220. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106807. Epub 2023 Jul 6. PubMed 37414459 ↗
  • Askew GN. Adaptations for extremely high muscular power output: why do muscles that operate at intermediate cycle frequencies generate the highest powers? J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2023 Jun;44(2):107-114. doi: 10.1007/s10974-022-09640-2. Epub 2023 Jan 11. PubMed 36627504 ↗
  • Edouard P, Nunes JP, Koral J, Thornton JS, Kemp JL, Gronwald T. Just start and keep training! What is the best resistance training prescription for strength and hypertrophy? Br J Sports Med. 2023 Sep;57(18):1161-1162. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107234. Epub 2023 Jul 5. No abstract available. PubMed 37407091 ↗
  • Shah A, Bordoni B. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb, Gluteus Medius Muscle. 2023 Feb 17. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557509/ PubMed 32491441 ↗
  • Khan IA, Bordoni B, Varacallo MA. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Thigh Gracilis Muscle. 2023 Apr 4. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538229/ PubMed 30855817 ↗
  • Granger CJ, Cohen-Levy WB. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Posterior Tibial Nerve(Archived). 2023 May 23. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546623/ PubMed 31536230 ↗
  • Thomakos P, Spyrou K, Katsikas C, Geladas ND, Bogdanis GC. Effects of Concurrent High-Intensity and Strength Training on Muscle Power and Aerobic Performance in Young Soccer Players during the Pre-Season. Sports (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;11(3):59. doi: 10.3390/sports11030059. PubMed 36976945 ↗
  • Champ CE, Carpenter DJ, Diaz AK, Rosenberg J, Ackerson BG, Hyde PN. Resistance Training for Patients with Cancer: A Conceptual Framework for Maximizing Strength, Power, Functional Mobility, and Body Composition to Optimize Health and Outcomes. Sports Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):75-89. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01759-z. Epub 2022 Sep 29. PubMed 36175646 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06479551
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 28, 2024
Start date
Nov 23, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2024
Completion
May 30, 2024
Last update
Jun 28, 2024

Study contacts

Aamir Gul Memon, MS
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion