CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06476496Updated May 12, 2026Results posted

Pain Relief With Integrative Medicine (PRIMe)?: Feasibility of Acupuncture for Long COVID

An interventional study of Acupuncture in Long COVID and Pain, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-12.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
93
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this preliminary study is to test methods and procedures to be used in a fully-powered trial to evaluate acupuncture treatment effectiveness. Specifically, we will test the feasibility of conducting a 2-arm randomized clinical trial for evaluating the effectiveness of acupuncture for pain in patients with long COVID. Researchers will compare pain intensity and impact on general activities over 5 months in those who receive acupuncture treatment compared to patients who are receiving usual long COVID care.

Participants will complete 4 online surveys at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 20. These surveys include validated mental and physical health questionnaires. Participants who are randomly selected to receive the intervention will receive 8 acupuncture treatment sessions.

Read the detailed description

Long-COVID has negatively impacted millions of individuals' quality of life, daily functioning, and ability to work, and has placed enormous demands on the healthcare system. Pain-related symptoms are reported by a large subset of patients with long COVID, and yet pain is still not consistently addressed in workups or treatment plans. Thus, we have chosen to study acupuncture for improving pain, quality of life, and function in individuals experiencing long COVID-related pain. Acupuncture has been shown to be successful in treating various types of chronic pain and should lend itself to similar results with pain related to long COVID. Furthermore, acupuncture focuses on treating the whole patient, which makes it uniquely well-suited for a complex condition affecting multiple body systems, like long COVID.

We propose an initial study to determine the feasibility of successfully conducting a subsequent fully-powered pragmatic randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) acupuncture for persistent pain problems experienced by persons with long COVID. Acupuncture is a physical treatment that aims to correct imbalances in the body (including inflammation and pain) within a Chinese Medicine paradigm.

Our specific aims are to:

  1. Assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial comparing acupuncture with usual care alone for reducing pain in patients with long COVID;
  2. Evaluate the overall patient experience with participation in the feasibility trial and solicit suggestions about how the study procedures, documents, and treatment protocols could be improved to facilitate participation and better meet participants' needs; and
  3. Revise study procedures, protocols, and instruments to prepare for a fully-powered pragmatic randomized trial.

Participants randomized to acupuncture will receive a total of 8 weekly individual treatments lasting one hour each. Participants will lie supine on a treatment table while the acupuncturist inserts needles in selected body points. Bilateral needling of the pre-specified acupuncture points will be performed according to TCM principles and will include efforts to obtain De Qi.

This study has the potential to help patients with long COVID improve function and quality of life, and to provide clinicians with more tools to effectively respond to their patients' needs. This study will occur through the University of Washington (UW) Long COVID Clinic at the UW Primary Care Northgate Clinic site.

02

Conditions studied

  • Long COVID
  • Pain
03

In context

Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome

520 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome; 186 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 93 is above the median of 60 across 361 interventional studies indexed under Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome.

Browse Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,397 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 132 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years of age at the time of consent.
  • Previous suspected, probable, or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, as defined by the Pan American Health Organization
  • Report pain symptoms including musculoskeletal pain (joint, muscle, bone pain), chest pain, abdominal pain, headache, back pain, nerve pain, and pain in ear following a SARS-CoV-2 infection that has persisted for at least 12 weeks and is still present at the time of consent.
  • Report pain intensity (0-10 scale) ≥4 in the last 7 days.28
  • As of today, has been seen by a clinician in the UW Long COVID Clinic either in-person or via telehealth/virtual visit
  • Able to speak and read English and provide informed consent to complete the study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<18 years of age at the time of consent.
  • Reports absence of pain, pain for less than 12 weeks, or a pain intensity \<4 over the last 7 days.
  • Report baseline level of pain for those who have pre-existing chronic pain (i.e., chronic pain condition(s) present prior to COVID-19 illness AND chronic pain not worsened post-COVID).
  • Already received acupuncture treatment for long COVID symptoms.
  • Unable to travel to the UW Northgate Clinic once a week for 8 weeks for acupuncture treatments.
  • Has seizure disorder with high risk of seizure (i.e., new diagnosis of seizure disorder and/or new medication in the last 3 months, or uncontrolled/unclear triggers for seizures).
  • Is currently Pregnant
  • Is receiving active cancer therapy
  • Has severe neutropenia (\<500 WBC) due to any cause within the last 6 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
93 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Acupuncture

    Participants will receive 8 sessions of acupuncture treatment

    Procedure: Acupuncture

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    Participants will continue to receive any current or recommended treatments from their doctors for their long COVID symptoms.

Interventions

  • ProcedureAcupuncture

    A licensed acupuncturist will insert sterile disposable acupuncture needles in the selected body and ear acupoints aiming to alleviate long COVID related pain symptoms. Needles will be removed after 20 minutes of retention. After all the needles are removed, the acupuncturist will insert Pyonex press tack needles (0.3mm) in the participants' left ears and suggest the participants retain them in their ears for up to 5 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity (PEG)

    The PEG is a widely used brief, three-item instrument that measures average pain intensity, enjoyment of life, and general activity in the past week, each rated on a 0 to 10 scale. Scores are calculated by averaging the scores of each of the three items. A higher score indicates worse pain impact.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Mid-Point (Week 4), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Final Follow-Up (Week 20)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Short Form

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) - Short Form is a 6-item self-report measure of catastrophic thinking related to pain, including rumination, magnification, and helplessness. PCS is a commonly used measure of pain experience and catastrophizing. Each measure is scored on a scale of 0 to 4. The PCS-SF score is determined by the sum of all 6 items; scores range from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate greater catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 8) and Final Follow-Up (Week 20)

  2. PROMIS-29

    PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a collection of person-centered tools that assess and track physical, mental, and social health in both adults and children. The PROMIS-29 Questionnaire includes 4-item short forms that measure anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and social role participation, along with a single item for pain intensity. Raw scores were converted to T-scores (using an adult referent population), ranging from 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10 in the reference population. High scores indicate more of the concept being measured (e.g., for physical function and ability to participate in social activities, a higher score signifies greater function; for all other domains, a higher score indicates worse function). Pain intensity is a single item scored separately on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores representing worse pain.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Final Follow-up (Week 20)

  3. PROMIS Cognitive Function

    The PROMIS Cognitive Function scale complements the PROMIS-29 with questions relevant to participants with Long COVID comorbidities, such as "brain fog." This scale measures patient-perceived cognitive deficits. Aspects include mental clarity, focus, verbal and nonverbal memory, verbal fluency, and perceived changes in cognitive functions. The scale consists of 8 items, each rated from 1 to 5 to generate a raw score; all 8 items must be answered for the scale to be scored. The T-score converts the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore, a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Final Follow-Up (Week 20)

  4. UW Pain Related Self-Efficacy Scale (PRSE)

    Pain-related self-efficacy is an individual's belief in their ability to accomplish important tasks and activities despite their pain. Identified subdomains include: Control/tolerance of/cope with symptoms, ability to manage the impact of pain on mood and psychological functioning, interpersonal relationships, and confidence to accomplish goals despite pain. The UW-PRSE was developed in a sample of adults living with chronic pain (mild to severe pain with average pain intensity of 3 or above on a scale from 0 to 10 for six months or longer and for at least half the days). This study used the 6-item short form. Individual items are summed, and the total sum is then transformed to an IRT-based T-score. T-Scores are standardized scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. The mean score of the calibration sample included only individuals with chronic pain. A higher T-Score indicates higher self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 8, 20

Other outcomes

  1. Total Time to Recruit All Study Participants

    Timely recruitment of study participants (criteria: complete recruitment of 60 participants within five months);

    Time frame: Prior to enrollment

  2. Study Participants' Retention in Treatment Arm

    Retention of participants in the treatment (criteria: 75% of participants attend at least 6 of 8 acupuncture visits)

    Time frame: Weeks 1-8

  3. Survey Response Rates

    Questionnaire Response Rates: (criterion: 70% of participants complete baseline, mid-point, and post-treatment questionnaires; 75% complete final questionnaire) The baseline survey was required to complete enrollment.

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 20

  4. Adherance to the Treatment Protocol

    Intervention fidelity (criteria: 80% of sessions fully adhere to the acupuncture treatment protocol). Each acupuncture visit was tracked, and a secondary acupuncturist provided quality control and reviewed the visit for fidelity to the acupuncture protocol.

    Time frame: Weeks 1 - 8

  5. Number of Visits Where Participants Adhered to Treatment Recommendations

    Participant Adherence to treatment recommendations (criteria: 50% leave acupuncture needles in place for at least 3 days)

    Time frame: Weeks 1-8

07

Results

Posted May 12, 2026
Limitations and caveats
This is a small proof-of-concept study.

Participant flow

Individuals were recruited through the UW Long COVID Clinic. Those who opted in with the clinic to be contacted for research opportunities received an email describing the study and a link to the screener to determine eligibility. Recruitment was open for 2-3 weeks before the acupuncture sessions began until all open acupuncture spots were filled.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAcupunctureUsual Care
Started4647
Completed3546
Not completed111
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100
Withdrew: Death001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by study team10

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain, Enjoyment and General Activity (PEG)

The PEG is a widely used brief, three-item instrument that measures average pain intensity, enjoyment of life, and general activity in the past week, each rated on a 0 to 10 scale. Scores are calculated by averaging the scores of each of the three items. A higher score indicates worse pain impact.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Mid-Point (Week 4), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Final Follow-Up (Week 20)
Reported as:
Mean · Score
Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity (PEG)
ScoreAcupunctureUsual Care
Baseline (Week 0)6.74 ± 1.436.74 ± 1.51
Midpoint (Week 4)8.33 ± 2.089.33 ± 1.91
Post-Intervention (Week 8)4.95 ± 2.146.03 ± 2.11
Final Follow-Up (Week 20)4.77 ± 2.225.89 ± 1.97
SecondaryPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Short Form

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) - Short Form is a 6-item self-report measure of catastrophic thinking related to pain, including rumination, magnification, and helplessness. PCS is a commonly used measure of pain experience and catastrophizing. Each measure is scored on a scale of 0 to 4. The PCS-SF score is determined by the sum of all 6 items; scores range from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate greater catastrophizing.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 8) and Final Follow-Up (Week 20)
Reported as:
Mean · Score
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Short Form
ScoreAcupunctureUsual Care
Baseline (Week 0)12.37 ± 5.9112.62 ± 5.38
Post-Intervention (Week 8)9.48 ± 5.8111.68 ± 5.96
Final Follow-Up (Week 20)7.52 ± 5.9111.97 ± 5.45
SecondaryPROMIS-29

PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a collection of person-centered tools that assess and track physical, mental, and social health in both adults and children. The PROMIS-29 Questionnaire includes 4-item short forms that measure anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and social role participation, along with a single item for pain intensity. Raw scores were converted to T-scores (using an adult referent population), ranging from 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10 in the reference population. High scores indicate more of the concept being measured (e.g., for physical function and ability to participate in social activities, a higher score signifies greater function; for all other domains, a higher score indicates worse function). Pain intensity is a single item scored separately on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores representing worse pain.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Final Follow-up (Week 20)
Reported as:
Mean · Scores
PROMIS-29
ScoresAcupunctureUsual Care
Ability to Participate in Social Roles: Baseline (Week 0)37.44 ± 6.4437.62 ± 7.86
Ability to Participate in Social Roles: Post Intervention (Week 8)38.95 ± 6.737.03 ± 8.23
Ability to Participate in Social Roles: Final Follow-Up (Week 20)40.39 ± 7.437.97 ± 7.66
Anxiety/Fear: Baseline (Week 0)60.47 ± 10.3159.78 ± 9.99
Anxiety/Fear: Post Intervention (Week 8)60.3 ± 9.0261.56 ± 8.11
Anxiety/Fear: Final Follow-Up (Week 20)60.95 ± 12.1661.29 ± 8.04
Depression/Sadness: Baseline (Week 0)58.84 ± 9.4257.78 ± 10.14
Depression/Sadness: Post Intervention (Week 8)58.3 ± 9.5658.62 ± 9.48
Depression/Sadness: Final Follow-Up (Week 20)58.89 ± 9.758.41 ± 10.15
Fatigue: Baseline (Week 0)68.92 ± 6.7268.26 ± 7.91
Fatigue: Post Intervention (Week 8)66.06 ± 7.669.22 ± 8.15
Fatigue: Final Follow-Up (Week 20)66.04 ± 8.4266.1 ± 8.74
Pain Interference: Baseline (Week 0)65.69 ± 5.1865.18 ± 6.13
Pain Interference: Post Intervention (Week 8)61.11 ± 8.364.51 ± 6.95
Pain Interference: Final Follow-Up (Week 20)62.62 ± 6.9465.11 ± 6.26
Physical Function: Baseline (Week 0)36.79 ± 5.6636.74 ± 6.77
Physical Function: Post Intervention (Week 8)38.81 ± 6.0337 ± 7.94
Physical Function: Final Follow-Up (Week 20)59.06 ± 8.257.27 ± 7.05
Sleep Disturbance: Baseline (Week 0)59.05 ± 7.4859.66 ± 7.22
Sleep Disturbance: Post Intervention (Week 8)56.62 ± 6.9859.52 ± 6.88
Sleep Disturbance: Final Follow-Up (Week 20)59.06 ± 8.257.27 ± 7.05
Pain Intensity: Baseline (Week 0)6.22 ± 1.266.38 ± 1.44
Pain Intensity: Post Intervention (Week 8)4.81 ± 1.996.05 ± 1.92
Pain Intensity: Final Follow-Up (Week 20)4.9 ± 2.26.2 ± 1.83
SecondaryPROMIS Cognitive Function

The PROMIS Cognitive Function scale complements the PROMIS-29 with questions relevant to participants with Long COVID comorbidities, such as "brain fog." This scale measures patient-perceived cognitive deficits. Aspects include mental clarity, focus, verbal and nonverbal memory, verbal fluency, and perceived changes in cognitive functions. The scale consists of 8 items, each rated from 1 to 5 to generate a raw score; all 8 items must be answered for the scale to be scored. The T-score converts the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore, a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Final Follow-Up (Week 20)
Reported as:
Mean · Scores
PROMIS Cognitive Function
ScoresAcupunctureUsual Care
Baseline (Week 0)33.52 ± 8.9731.56 ± 8.36
Post Intervention (Week 8)35.62 ± 10.0533.04 ± 8.25
Final Follow-Up (Week 20)37.87 ± 10.4832.92 ± 8.44
SecondaryUW Pain Related Self-Efficacy Scale (PRSE)

Pain-related self-efficacy is an individual's belief in their ability to accomplish important tasks and activities despite their pain. Identified subdomains include: Control/tolerance of/cope with symptoms, ability to manage the impact of pain on mood and psychological functioning, interpersonal relationships, and confidence to accomplish goals despite pain. The UW-PRSE was developed in a sample of adults living with chronic pain (mild to severe pain with average pain intensity of 3 or above on a scale from 0 to 10 for six months or longer and for at least half the days). This study used the 6-item short form. Individual items are summed, and the total sum is then transformed to an IRT-based T-score. T-Scores are standardized scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. The mean score of the calibration sample included only individuals with chronic pain. A higher T-Score indicates higher self-efficacy.

Time frame:
Weeks 0, 8, 20
Reported as:
Mean · T-Scores
UW Pain Related Self-Efficacy Scale (PRSE)
T-ScoresAcupunctureUsual Care
Baseline (Week 0)44.24 ± 7.2543.71 ± 8.02
Post Intervention (Week 8)47.75 ± 7.8845.23 ± 10.89
Final Follow-Up (Week 20)44.9 ± 10.0644.98 ± 9.24
Other pre-specifiedTotal Time to Recruit All Study Participants

Timely recruitment of study participants (criteria: complete recruitment of 60 participants within five months);

Time frame:
Prior to enrollment
Reported as:
Number · months
Total Time to Recruit All Study Participants
monthsStudy Participants
Total Time to Recruit All Study Participants3
Other pre-specifiedStudy Participants' Retention in Treatment Arm

Retention of participants in the treatment (criteria: 75% of participants attend at least 6 of 8 acupuncture visits)

Time frame:
Weeks 1-8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Study Participants' Retention in Treatment Arm
ParticipantsAcupuncture
Study Participants' Retention in Treatment Arm29
Other pre-specifiedSurvey Response Rates

Questionnaire Response Rates: (criterion: 70% of participants complete baseline, mid-point, and post-treatment questionnaires; 75% complete final questionnaire) The baseline survey was required to complete enrollment.

Time frame:
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 20
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Survey Response Rates
ParticipantsAcupunctureUsual Care
Baseline (Week 0)4647
Midpoint (Week 4)3338
Post-Intervention (Week 8)3138
Final Follow-Up (Week 20)3135
Other pre-specifiedAdherance to the Treatment Protocol

Intervention fidelity (criteria: 80% of sessions fully adhere to the acupuncture treatment protocol). Each acupuncture visit was tracked, and a secondary acupuncturist provided quality control and reviewed the visit for fidelity to the acupuncture protocol.

Time frame:
Weeks 1 - 8
Reported as:
Number · Acupuncture Visits
Adherance to the Treatment Protocol
Acupuncture VisitsAcupuncture
Adherance to the Treatment Protocol228
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Visits Where Participants Adhered to Treatment Recommendations

Participant Adherence to treatment recommendations (criteria: 50% leave acupuncture needles in place for at least 3 days)

Time frame:
Weeks 1-8
Reported as:
Number · AcupunctureVisits
Number of Visits Where Participants Adhered to Treatment Recommendations
AcupunctureVisitsAcupuncture
Number of Visits Where Participants Adhered to Treatment Recommendations202

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment until the end of follow-up (week 20). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Acupuncture1/46 (2.2%)10/46 (21.7%)9/46 (19.6%)
Usual Care1/47 (2.1%)11/47 (23.4%)0/47 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent serious events
EventAcupunctureUsual Care
Musculoskeletal pain or injuryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/462/47
Hospitalized for planned surgerySurgical and medical procedures1/463/47
Psychiatric disorders (psychosis)Psychiatric disorders2/460/47
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/462/47
Accidental injury (fracture or foreign body)Injury, poisoning and procedural complications0/462/47
Cardiac symptoms (palpitations or chest pain)Cardiac disorders1/461/47
Eye disorder (acute vision loss)Eye disorders1/460/47
General symptoms requiring evaluationGeneral disorders1/460/47
Genitourinary or gynecologic symptomsRenal and urinary disorders1/461/47
Genitourinary or gynecologic symptomsReproductive system and breast disorders1/460/47
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAcupunctureUsual Care
Localized pain at needle siteSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders5/460/47
Bruising at the needle siteSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/460/47

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AcupunctureUsual CareTotal
Mean45.15 ± 12.2546.47 ± 12.6745.82 ± 12.41
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)AcupunctureUsual CareTotal
Female343569
Male121123
Prefer Not to Answer011
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AcupunctureUsual CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian358
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American325
White332962
More than one race224
Unknown or Not Reported5813
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AcupunctureUsual CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino2810
Not Hispanic or Latino423678
Unknown or Not Reported235
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UW Medicine Primary Care at Northgate
    Seattle, Washington 98125, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 20, 2026
  • Informed consent form · Aug 24, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06476496
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
Responsible party
Nikki Gentile (Assistant Professor, Family Medicine, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 26, 2024
Start date
Jun 21, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 23, 2025
Results posted
May 12, 2026
Last update
May 12, 2026

Study contacts

Nikki Gentile, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion