ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06474819DEEPUpdated Jul 15, 2024

Left Septal or Deep Septal Pacing to Prevent Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy

An interventional study of Pacemaker implant in Complete Heart Block and Second Degree Atrioventricular Block Möbitz Type II, sponsored by Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge. Recruiting at 6 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-15.

Sponsored by Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2024; still recruiting 2 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
326
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multicenter randomized controlled trial which will include patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >50% requiring a first implant of a cardiac pacemaker with expected high pacing percentages.

Patients will be randomized 1:1 to right ventricular apical pacing vs left septal or deep septal pacing. The primary endpoint will be pacing-induced cardiomyopathy during the first year of follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Complete Heart Block
  • Second Degree Atrioventricular Block Möbitz Type II
03

In context

Atrioventricular Block

117 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrioventricular Block; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 326 is above the median of 127 across 78 interventional studies indexed under Atrioventricular Block.

Browse Atrioventricular Block studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • First implant of a single-chamber or dual chamber pacemaker due to persistent bradycardia associated with high degree atrio-ventricular (AV) block (complete AV block or second degree type II AV block), with second-degree type I AV block (symptomatic or associated with intra-hisian or infra-hisian block), or with atrial fibrillation with symptomatic slow ventricular rate (\<45lpm).
  • >50% at echocardiography performed maximum 7 days before pacemaker implant.
  • signature.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<12 months
  • Severe cardiac valvular abnormality requiring intervention
  • Unstable Angina, Acute myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, valvular surgery or valvular percutaneous intervention in the 90 days prior to pacemaker implant.
  • Inclusion in another trial which may influence the results of this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
326 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    deep

    The ventricular lead will be penetrated into the basal interventricular septum aiming at left septal pacing and, if not possible, at least deep septal pacing with a paced QRS duration \<=140ms.

    Device: Pacemaker implant

  • Active comparator
    Apex

    The ventricular lead will be placed in the right ventricular apex.

    Device: Pacemaker implant

Interventions

  • DevicePacemaker implant

    All patients in the study will have a clear indication for a permanent pacemaker. The type of device (single or dual chamber) will be chosen as per clinical practice. The only difference between the two groups of the study will be the position of the ventricular lead.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy

    Decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by \>10% as compared to the LVEF before pacemaker implant and final LVEF\<45%.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. LVEF during follow-up

    To compare the mean or median (depending on distribution) LVEF before and one year after pacemaker implant in the two groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation

    To compare the degree of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation before and one year after pacemaker implant in the two groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class

    To compare the NYHA class one year after pacemaker implant in the two groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Brain Natriuretic Peptide levels

    To compare the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels one year after pacemaker implant in the two groups.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. heart failure

    Comparison of heart failure (HF) events in the first year after pacemaker implant in the two groups. HF events will be: hospitalizations for heart failure, emergency department or day-hospital visits for heart failure, heart failure symptoms requiring the initiation of diuretic therapy.

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Complications

    Complications related to the ventricular lead

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 6 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study protocol and the informed consent form will be available upon request during the whole duration of the study.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: During the whole duration of the study

Access criteria: Request to the principal investigator.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06474819
Lead sponsor
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge
Collaborators
Fundació La Marató de TV3, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Responsible party
Andrea Di Marco (Principal Investigator, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 26, 2024
Start date
Jul 12, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 12, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 12, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 15, 2024

Study contacts

Andrea Di Marco, MD, PhD
Contact
adimarco@bellvitgehospital.cat
+34932 60 75 00 ext. 8385
Andrea Di Marco, MD, PhD
principal investigator · IDIBELL and Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion