ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06473402Updated Jun 25, 2024

Effects of Manual Therapy Techniques on Hamstring

An interventional study of Muscle Strength Test and Hamstring Flexibility in Muscle Tightness and Muscle Spasm, sponsored by Bezmialem Vakif University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-25.

Sponsored by Bezmialem Vakif University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hamstring shortness occurs in almost all populations worldwide, in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. The causes of hamstring shortness include genetic factors, adaptation of the muscle to acute or chronic injury, sitting in a sitting position for a long time, etc. countable. Some studies have stated that decreased hamstring flexibility may cause patellar tendinopathy, patellofemoral pain, hamstring strain, and muscle damage after eccentric exercise.Therefore, the flexibility of the hamstring muscles must be maintained. The objective of current research is to contrast the immediate consequences of two distinct manual therapy methods applied to individuals with a short hamstring muscle on the said muscle.

Read the detailed description

Flexibility is the ability of the muscle to move in a single or a series of joint planes within an unrestricted range of motion. Muscle flexibility is an important element of muscle functionality and has a very important place in ensuring the biomechanical function of the muscle. One of the advantages of flexibility in the context of literature is its ability to enhance athletic performance, decrease the likelihood of injury, alleviate or minimize post-exercise discomfort, and improve coordination. Furthermore, it serves as a crucial aspect for injury prevention and rehabilitation. Limited flexibility causes the person to be prone to various musculoskeletal system overuse injuries and significantly affects functionality. Flexibility is different for each muscle. This difference depends on the adaptation of the muscle to the stresses placed on the muscle. Decreased flexibility is usually seen in fast-twitch muscles that span two joints. Hamstring muscles are a typical example of this. In normal daily activities, the physiological amplitudes of the hamstring muscles are rarely fully realized. For this reason, hamstring muscles are one of the muscle groups that tend to shorten. Hamstring shortness occurs in almost all populations worldwide, in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. The causes of hamstring shortness include genetic factors, adaptation of the muscle to acute or chronic injury, sitting in a sitting position for a long time, etc. countable. Some studies have stated that decreased hamstring flexibility may cause patellar tendinopathy, patellofemoral pain, hamstring strain, and muscle damage after eccentric exercise.Therefore, the flexibility of the hamstring muscles must be maintained. Flexible hamstrings can prevent acute and chronic musculoskeletal injuries, low back pain, posture deviations, gait limitations and the risk of falls. Stretching exercises are often performed to increase hamstring flexibility . There are also different methods to increase hamstring flexibility. A widely used approach is manual therapy. According to Greenman, this method can strengthen weak muscles by restoring their normal length when they are shortened, contracted, or affected by spasticity. In addition, manual therapy can help reduce edema by promoting the lymphatic system's pumping action. This approach also enhances the mobility of joints with limited movement.

Another alternative method is massage application. Massage is believed to increase blood flow to the muscles and increase muscle temperature, thus improving performance. In addition to the effects mentioned above, massage is believed to reduce the risk of injury by increasing flexibility and reducing stiffness.

The rate of use of massage guns has increased significantly, especially in recent years, by athletes, coaches and physiotherapists. Perhaps the most important reasons why it is so popular are that it helps to increase sports performance and increase the level of flexibility. According to the literature, applying the sacroiliac joint muscle energy technique and percussion massage to the hamstring muscle has been shown to increase hamstring flexibility. However, there is no study available that compares the immediate effects of applying the sacroiliac joint muscle energy technique versus percussion massage on hamstring shortness. Therefore, the aim of our study is to compare the instant effects of sacroiliac joint muscle energy technique and percussion massage applications on hamstring flexibility.

02

Conditions studied

  • Muscle Tightness
  • Muscle Spasm

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • manual therapy
  • muscle energy techniques
  • vibration
  • hamstring flexibility
  • muscle strength
03

In context

Spasm

123 studies on the registry are indexed under Spasm; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 80 across 104 interventional studies indexed under Spasm.

Browse Spasm studies →

Lead sponsor

Bezmialem Vakif University is the lead sponsor of 354 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Clinical diagnosis of hamstring muscle shortness Must be able to cooperate with therapist

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Previous trauma or surgery Ankle instability. Having neurological findings during the SLR test. Hyperalgesia, hematoma, varicose veins or skin infection in the lower extremity.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Muscle Energy Technique

    Patients received anterior and posterior innominate muscle energy techniques. The anterior technique had the patient lying on their back with their leg on the diagonal shoulder. The clinician flexed the knee and hip, placed their hand on the back thigh, and instructed the patient to push, resulting in hip extension. After eight seconds, the patient inhaled and exhaled. The clinician then increased hip flexion and pushed against a new barrier. The posterior technique was performed with the patient lying on their side in the modified sims position. The clinician held the leg with their caudal hand and placed the hypothenar edge of their cranial hand on the right SIPS. They then extended the leg in their caudal hand and had the patient pull it towards themselves, applying equal counterforce. After eight seconds, the patient inhaled and exhaled. The clinician then extended the leg and pushed it towards a new barrier.

    Diagnostic Test: Muscle Strength Test · Diagnostic Test: Hamstring Flexibility · Diagnostic Test: Knee Range of Motion · Other: Manual Therapy Technique

  • Experimental
    Massage Gun

    A percussion massage device was used in the study. Massage application was applied to the Hamstring muscle, adhering to optimal standards. During the application, a wide round head, which is the most preferred by clinical professionals, was used and 30 Hz, which is considered as the average application speed, was used. The application was applied for a total of 6 minutes, 2 minutes for each part of the muscle. Applications have been made many times on every part of the muscle, from the starting point to the ending point.

    Diagnostic Test: Muscle Strength Test · Diagnostic Test: Hamstring Flexibility · Diagnostic Test: Knee Range of Motion · Device: Percussion Therapy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMuscle Strength Test

    Hamstring muscle strength of the participants was measured with a dynamometer (Microfet 2, Hoggan Health Industries, HHD) with the knee flexed at 90 degrees. After the physiotherapist fixes and positions the dynamometer 5 cm proximal to the calcaneus with a belt, the participant will be asked to accelerate to maximum isometric strength by trying to bring his heel closer to his hip against this resistance. The isometric strength of the hamstring muscle will be measured in Newtons (N) by being asked to wait at maximum force level for three seconds. Measurements were made in 2 repetitions and the highest value was noted. There will be a 30-second rest period between attempts.

  • Diagnostic testHamstring Flexibility

    The Sit and Reach Test will be administered to evaluate flexibility. Measurements will be made with a test stand with a length of 35 cm, a width of 45 cm and a height of 32 cm. The measurement of the participant who cannot reach the zero point of the sole of the foot on this tripod will be recorded as minus (-), while the measurement of the participant who can pass the zero point will be recorded as plus (+). Participants will be seated in a long sitting position with the soles of their feet resting on the testing apparatus, and the measurement will begin with their knee joints fully extended. While leaning his body forward, he will be asked to lie forward as far as he can, with his hands in front of his body, without bending his knees. The test will be repeated 2 times and the best value will be recorded in cm.

  • Diagnostic testKnee Range of Motion

    Joint range of motion measurement of the participants was made with a universal goniometer. Degree was used as the measurement unit. The measurement was made in the prone position. The pivot point of the goniometer is placed on the lateral epicondyle of the femur, and the fixed arm is kept parallel to the lateral midline of the femur, while the movable arm will follow the fibula. The joint range of motion of the participants was measured before and after manual therapy. AAOS (American of Orthopedic Surgeons) was taken as the reference value.

  • DevicePercussion Therapy

    A percussion massage device was used in the study. Massage application was applied to the Hamstring muscle, adhering to optimal standards. During the application, a wide round head, which is the most preferred by clinical professionals, was used and 30 Hz, which is considered as the average application speed, was used. The application was applied for a total of 6 minutes, 2 minutes for each part of the muscle. Applications have been made many times on every part of the muscle, from the starting point to the ending point.

  • OtherManual Therapy Technique

    Anterior and posterior innominate muscle energy techniques were performed on patients. In the anterior technique, the patient lay on their back with their leg on the diagonal shoulder. The clinician flexed the hip and knee, placed their hand on the back thigh, and instructed the patient to push, resulting in hip extension. After eight seconds, the patient inhaled and exhaled. The clinician then increased hip flexion and applied pressure against a new barrier. In the posterior technique, the patient lay on their side in the modified sims position. The clinician held the leg with their caudal hand and placed the hypothenar edge of their cranial hand on the right SIPS. The patient then pulled the leg towards themselves, applying equal counterforce for eight seconds before inhaling and exhaling. Finally, the clinician extended the leg and pushed it against a new barrier.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hamstring Flexibility

    Hamstring flexibility was measured with sit and reach test

    Time frame: Change from baseline to final examination immediate after 6 minutes of manual therapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hamstring Strength

    Hamstring strength was measured with dynamometer

    Time frame: Change from baseline to final examination immediate after 6 minutes of manual therapy

  2. Range of Motion

    Knee flexion range of motion was measured with goniometer

    Time frame: Change from baseline to final examination immediate after 6 minutes of manual therapy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bezmialem Vakif University
    Istanbul, Turkey
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2024 to primary completion in Jun 2024, 0 months.

Of 24 interventional studies with no phase under Spasm, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 34. This study's 0 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 11, 2024
First posted
Jun 25, 2024
StartActual
May 16, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jun 4, 2024
CompletionActual
Jun 4, 2024
Last update
Jun 25, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06473402
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 25, 2024
Start date
May 16, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 4, 2024
Completion
Jun 4, 2024
Last update
Jun 25, 2024

Study contacts

Çağla Yılmaz, Bsc.
principal investigator · Bezmialem Vakif University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion