ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06466733PREMMAUpdated May 7, 2025

Puerto Rico Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery for the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Trial (PREMMA)

An interventional study of Embolization of the middle meningeal artery and Surgical Evacuation via burr hole or craniotomy in Chronic Subdural Hematoma, sponsored by Juan M. Ramos Acevedo. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-07.

Sponsored by Juan M. Ramos Acevedo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
658
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Puerto Rico Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (PREMMA) trial is a multi-center, parallel, prospective, superiority, randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation comparing reoperation rates and neurological outcomes in patients with chronic subdural hematoma that receive treatment via embolization of the middle meningeal artery versus surgical evacuation via burr hole trephination or craniotomy.

Read the detailed description

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a collection of fluid and blood breakdown products that evolves over weeks to months in the subdural space. This condition is more common among people older than 65 years and has been associated with increased use of antithrombotic therapy among this population. The World population is rapidly aging; thus, the investigators expect the number of patients with cSDH will increase. The United Nations World Social Report places Puerto Rico in the 7th place of countries with the largest share of people aged 65 years or over. This pathology burdens healthcare systems; therefore, assessing the feasibility of treatment modalities for cSDH that are less invasive, have lower procedural risks, and have lower recurrence rates that require additional surgical intervention is essential.

The standard of care for symptomatic cSDH is the surgical evacuation (SE) of the hematoma, with recurrence rates between 10-30% and surgical rescue indicated for most of these cases. Evacuation of the hematoma effectively relieves its mass effect but does not change the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism. In recent years, embolization of the middle meningeal artery (eMMA) has been shown to decrease the recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma and the need for revision burr hole or craniotomy. The PREMMA trial aims to compare embolization of the middle meningeal artery as stand-alone treatment for chronic subdural hematoma versus the standard of care, surgical evacuation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Keywords

  • Chronic subdural hematoma
  • Embolization of the middle meningeal artery
  • Surgical evacuation
  • Hemorrhage
  • Intracranial hemorrhage
  • Cerebrovascular disease
  • Chronic disease
03

In context

Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic

112 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 658 is above the median of 185 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic.

Browse Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Juan M. Ramos Acevedo as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 21
  • Speak and understand Spanish or English
  • Resident of Puerto Rico
  • Glasgow coma scale ≥ 14/15
  • Presence of cSDH on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Neurological indication for treatment of cSDH (Markwalder scale ≤ 2)
  • No previous surgical or endovascular treatment for symptomatic cSDH
  • Signed for participation in the study by the patient or legally authorized representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute subdural hematoma
  • Focal, non-hemispheric localization of cSDH
  • Evidence of other lesions associated with cSDH, such as neoplasms, vascular lesions, or additional epidural, subarachnoid, or parenchymal hemorrhage on non-contrast computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
  • Imaging evidence of skull fracture over the subdural hematoma
  • Presence of any cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt
  • Imaging evidence of midline shift ≥ 10 mm
  • Imaging evidence of basal cistern effacement
  • Imaging evidence of dilatation of lateral ventricles
  • Imaging evidence of uncal herniation
  • Modified Rankin scale ≥ 3 before developing symptoms associated with cSDH
  • for angiography (i.e., complex anatomy or kidney failure)
  • Comorbidity making follow-up impossible
  • Pregnancy
  • Vulnerable patients, including homeless patients, incarcerated patients, and mentally ill patients without appropriate medical decision-making proxies that the physician believes are incapable of appropriately assessing the risks of the procedure
  • Absence of medical insurance
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
658 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Endovascular Embolization

    Embolization of the middle meningeal artery

    Procedure: Embolization of the middle meningeal artery

  • Active comparator
    Surgical Evacuation of Hematoma

    Burr hole or craniotomy

    Procedure: Surgical Evacuation via burr hole or craniotomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureEmbolization of the middle meningeal artery

    Embolization of the middle meningeal artery ipsilateral to the chronic subdural hematoma is performed infusing embolic polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) microparticles.

  • ProcedureSurgical Evacuation via burr hole or craniotomy

    The standard of care for chronic subdural hematoma, burr hole or craniotomy are performed ipsilateral to the lesion.

    Also known as: Burr hole, Craniotomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reoperation

    Number of patients requiring reoperation due to recurrent chronic subdural hematoma.

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) will assess neurological disability. The scale comprises seven levels, from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability, and 6 indicating death.

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 24 hours, 2 weeks, 1.5 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months

  2. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

    The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) will assess consciousness level. GCS score can range from 3 (completely unresponsive) to 15 (completely alert and oriented).

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 24 hours, 2 weeks

  3. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The visual analog scale (VAS) will assess pain levels. VAS represents the severity of pain from 0 "no pain" to 10 "very severe pain."

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 24 hours, 2 weeks, 1.5 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  4. Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)

    Will be measured with the EuroQol 5 dimensions and 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) grading scale.

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 2 weeks, 1.5 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  5. Radiological outcomes

    Will be measured by routine computed tomography compared with pre-operative images.

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  6. Technical success of embolization of the middle meningeal artery (eMMA)

    The rate of unsuccessful eMMA due to technical failure or anatomical issues will be recorded.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  7. Procedure-related complications

    Any life-threatening event from enrollment to discharge will be recorded.

    Time frame: 24 hours, 2 weeks, 1.5 months, 3 months

  8. Adverse events

    Any unintentional injury or complication involving a prolonged stay, disability at discharge, or death caused by healthcare management, not the underlying disease, will be recorded.

    Time frame: 24 hours, 2 weeks, 1.5 months, 3 months

  9. Post-operative morbidity

    All surgical and/or medical complications that occur.

    Time frame: 24 hours, 2 weeks, 1.5 months, 3 months

  10. Mortality

    The number of participants among the total number of deaths.

    Time frame: 24 hours, 2 weeks, 30 days, 1.5 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  11. Length of stay

    The patient's hospitalization period.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge or date of death from any cause while patient is in hospital, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ropper AH. Beneath a Tough Mother (Dura Mater) - Chronic Subdural Hematoma. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2678-2680. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2031257. Epub 2020 Dec 16. No abstract available. PubMed 33326714 ↗
  • Jung YG, Jung NY, Kim E. Independent predictors for recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015 Apr;57(4):266-70. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2015.57.4.266. Epub 2015 Apr 24. No abstract available. PubMed 25932293 ↗
  • Edlmann E, Giorgi-Coll S, Whitfield PC, Carpenter KLH, Hutchinson PJ. Pathophysiology of chronic subdural haematoma: inflammation, angiogenesis and implications for pharmacotherapy. J Neuroinflammation. 2017 May 30;14(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0881-y. PubMed 28558815 ↗
  • Moshayedi P, Liebeskind DS. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: Implications of Pathophysiology in Trial Design. Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 27;11:923. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00923. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32973670 ↗
  • Henry J, Amoo M, Kissner M, Deane T, Zilani G, Crockett MT, Javadpour M. Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-analysis of 455 Studies With 103 645 Cases. Neurosurgery. 2022 Dec 1;91(6):842-855. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002144. Epub 2022 Sep 28. PubMed 36170165 ↗
  • Dudoit T, Labeyrie PE, Deryckere S, Emery E, Gaberel T. Is systematic post-operative CT scan indicated after chronic subdural hematoma surgery? A case-control study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Jul;158(7):1241-6. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2820-6. Epub 2016 May 5. PubMed 27147520 ↗
  • Chen FM, Wang K, Xu KL, Wang L, Zhan TX, Cheng F, Wang H, Chen ZB, Gao L, Yang XF. Predictors of acute intracranial hemorrhage and recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma following burr hole drainage. BMC Neurol. 2020 Mar 13;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01669-5. PubMed 32169039 ↗
  • Thomas PAW, Mitchell PS, Marshman LAG. Early Postoperative Morbidity After Chronic Subdural Hematoma: Predictive Usefulness of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade in a Prospective Cohort. World Neurosurg. 2019 Apr;124:e489-e497. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.119. Epub 2019 Jan 3. PubMed 30610985 ↗
  • Kolias AG, Chari A, Santarius T, Hutchinson PJ. Chronic subdural haematoma: modern management and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Oct;10(10):570-8. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.163. Epub 2014 Sep 16. PubMed 25224156 ↗
  • Santarius T, Kirkpatrick PJ, Ganesan D, Chia HL, Jalloh I, Smielewski P, Richards HK, Marcus H, Parker RA, Price SJ, Kirollos RW, Pickard JD, Hutchinson PJ. Use of drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1067-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61115-6. PubMed 19782872 ↗
  • Nouri A, Gondar R, Schaller K, Meling T. Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH): A review of the current state of the art. Brain Spine. 2021 Nov 2;1:100300. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2021.100300. eCollection 2021. PubMed 36247395 ↗
  • Desir LL, Narayan V, Ellis J, Gordon D, Langer D, Ortiz R, Serulle Y. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in the Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: a Comprehensive Review of Current Literature. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 Apr;23(4):109-119. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01262-6. Epub 2023 Apr 11. PubMed 37037979 ↗
  • Miah IP, Tank Y, Rosendaal FR, Peul WC, Dammers R, Lingsma HF, den Hertog HM, Jellema K, van der Gaag NA; Dutch Chronic Subdural Hematoma Research Group. Radiological prognostic factors of chronic subdural hematoma recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology. 2021 Jan;63(1):27-40. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02558-x. Epub 2020 Oct 22. Erratum In: Neuroradiology. 2021 Jan;63(1):159-160. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02597-4. PubMed 33094383 ↗
  • Rauhala M, Helen P, Huhtala H, Heikkila P, Iverson GL, Niskakangas T, Ohman J, Luoto TM. Chronic subdural hematoma-incidence, complications, and financial impact. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Sep;162(9):2033-2043. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04398-3. Epub 2020 Jun 10. PubMed 32524244 ↗
  • Almenawer SA, Farrokhyar F, Hong C, Alhazzani W, Manoranjan B, Yarascavitch B, Arjmand P, Baronia B, Reddy K, Murty N, Singh S. Chronic subdural hematoma management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34,829 patients. Ann Surg. 2014 Mar;259(3):449-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000255. PubMed 24096761 ↗
  • Ironside N, Nguyen C, Do Q, Ugiliweneza B, Chen CJ, Sieg EP, James RF, Ding D. Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Oct;13(10):951-957. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017352. Epub 2021 Jun 30. PubMed 34193592 ↗
  • Mignucci-Jimenez G, Matos-Cruz AJ, Abramov I, Hanalioglu S, Kovacs MS, Preul MC, Feliciano-Valls CE. Puerto Rico Recurrence Scale: Predicting chronic subdural hematoma recurrence risk after initial surgical drainage. Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Jun 3;13:230. doi: 10.25259/SNI_240_2022. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35855136 ↗
  • Flores G, Vicenty JC, Pastrana EA. Post-operative seizures after burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas: is prophylactic anti-epileptic medication needed? Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Nov;159(11):2033-2036. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3298-6. Epub 2017 Aug 15. PubMed 28808801 ↗
  • De Jesus O, Pacheco H, Negron B. Chronic and subacute subdural hematoma in the adult population. The Puerto Rico experience. P R Health Sci J. 1998 Sep;17(3):227-33. PubMed 9883468 ↗
  • De Jesus O, Monserrate AE. Burr Hole Surgery for Drainage of Chronic and Subacute Subdural Hematomas: Low Recurrence Rate in a Single Surgeon Cohort. Cureus. 2021 Nov 5;13(11):e19288. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19288. eCollection 2021 Nov. PubMed 34900470 ↗
  • Altaf I, Shams S, Vohra AH. Radiolological predictors of recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jan-Feb;34(1):194-197. doi: 10.12669/pjms.341.13735. PubMed 29643906 ↗
  • Joyce E, Bounajem MT, Scoville J, Thomas AJ, Ogilvy CS, Riina HA, Tanweer O, Levy EI, Spiotta AM, Gross BA, Jankowitz BT, Cawley CM, Khalessi AA, Pandey AS, Ringer AJ, Hanel R, Ortiz RA, Langer D, Levitt MR, Binning M, Taussky P, Kan P, Grandhi R. Middle meningeal artery embolization treatment of nonacute subdural hematomas in the elderly: a multiinstitutional experience of 151 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Oct;49(4):E5. doi: 10.3171/2020.7.FOCUS20518. PubMed 33002874 ↗
  • Ban SP, Hwang G, Byoun HS, Kim T, Lee SU, Bang JS, Han JH, Kim CY, Kwon OK, Oh CW. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma. Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):992-999. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170053. Epub 2017 Oct 10. PubMed 29019449 ↗
  • Desir LL, D'Amico R, Link T, Silva D, Ellis JA, Doron O, Langer DJ, Ortiz R, Serulle Y. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization and the Treatment of a Chronic Subdural Hematoma. Cureus. 2021 Oct 18;13(10):e18868. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18868. eCollection 2021 Oct. PubMed 34754700 ↗
  • Ashry A, Al-Shami H, Gamal M, Salah AM. Local anesthesia versus general anesthesia for evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma in elderly patients above 70 years old. Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Jan 12;13:13. doi: 10.25259/SNI_425_2021. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35127213 ↗
  • Catapano JS, Ducruet AF, Nguyen CL, Cole TS, Baranoski JF, Majmundar N, Wilkinson DA, Fredrickson VL, Cavalcanti DD, Lawton MT, Albuquerque FC. A propensity-adjusted comparison of middle meningeal artery embolization versus conventional therapy for chronic subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg. 2021 Feb 26;135(4):1208-1213. doi: 10.3171/2020.9.JNS202781. Print 2021 Oct 1. PubMed 33636706 ↗
  • Dian J, Linton J, Shankar JJ. Risk of recurrence of subdural hematoma after EMMA vs surgical drainage - Systematic review and meta-analysis. Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Aug;27(4):577-583. doi: 10.1177/1591019921990962. Epub 2021 Feb 1. PubMed 33525919 ↗
  • Srivatsan A, Mohanty A, Nascimento FA, Hafeez MU, Srinivasan VM, Thomas A, Chen SR, Johnson JN, Kan P. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:613-619. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.167. Epub 2018 Nov 24. PubMed 30481628 ↗
  • Sattari SA, Yang W, Shahbandi A, Feghali J, Lee RP, Xu R, Jackson C, Gonzalez LF, Tamargo RJ, Huang J, Caplan JM. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Conventional Management for Patients With Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurosurgery. 2023 Jun 1;92(6):1142-1154. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002365. Epub 2023 Mar 17. PubMed 36929762 ↗
  • Ku JC, Dmytriw AA, Essibayi MA, Banihashemi MA, Vranic JE, Ghozy S, Altschul D, Regenhardt RW, Stapleton CJ, Yang VXD, Patel AB. Embolic Agent Choice in Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization as Primary or Adjunct Treatment for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Mar;44(3):297-302. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7796. Epub 2023 Feb 16. PubMed 36797028 ↗
  • Kan P, Maragkos GA, Srivatsan A, Srinivasan V, Johnson J, Burkhardt JK, Robinson TM, Salem MM, Chen S, Riina HA, Tanweer O, Levy EI, Spiotta AM, Kasab SA, Lena J, Gross BA, Cherian J, Cawley CM, Howard BM, Khalessi AA, Pandey AS, Ringer AJ, Hanel R, Ortiz RA, Langer D, Kelly CM, Jankowitz BT, Ogilvy CS, Moore JM, Levitt MR, Binning M, Grandhi R, Siddiq F, Thomas AJ. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Multi-Center Experience of 154 Consecutive Embolizations. Neurosurgery. 2021 Jan 13;88(2):268-277. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa379. PubMed 33026434 ↗
  • Enriquez-Marulanda A, Gomez-Paz S, Salem MM, Mallick A, Motiei-Langroudi R, Arle JE, Stippler M, Papavassiliou E, Alterman RL, Ogilvy CS, Moore JM, Thomas AJ. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Conventional Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematomas. Neurosurgery. 2021 Aug 16;89(3):486-495. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab192. PubMed 34171921 ↗
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30. PubMed 18929686 ↗
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9. PubMed 31078660 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2025; primary completion for Jul 2031, 74 months later.

Of 44 interventional studies with no phase under Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 37 and three quarters within 70. This study's planned 74 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 15, 2024
First posted
Jun 20, 2024
StartEst.
May 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2031
CompletionEst.
Jul 2032
Last update
May 7, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06466733
Lead sponsor
Juan M. Ramos Acevedo
Responsible party
Juan M. Ramos Acevedo (Principal Investigator, University of Puerto Rico) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 20, 2024
Start date
May 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2032 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2025

Study contacts

Maria M Garcia Perez
Contact
dra.garcia.neurosx@gmail.com
939-417-4432
Juan M Ramos Acevedo, MD
principal investigator · University of Puerto Rico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion