ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06460415Updated Jun 14, 2024

Effects of Photobiomodulation on Pain and Sexual Function in Women With Dyspareunia: Randomized Clinical Trial

An interventional study of photobiomidulação and Placebo in Dyspareunia, Pain and Sexual Dysfunction, sponsored by Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-14.

Sponsored by Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of vulvar and intravaginal application of PBM compared to the sham group on pain and sexual function in women with dyspareunia . The main question [s] it aims to answer are:

  • What are the effects of vulvar and intravaginal application of photobiomodulation (PBM) compared to the sham group on the sexual function of women with dyspareunia in the immediate post-intervention moments and in follow-ups of 15, 30, 90 and 180 days?
  • What are the effects of vulvar and intravaginal application of photobiomodulation (PBM) compared to the sham group on pain in women with dyspareunia in the immediate post-intervention moments and in follow-ups of 15, 30, 90 and 180 days?

Participants will The GPBM photobiomodulation group will receive, during the 8 days of intervention, application in 8 points (4 red and 4 infrared) in the vulvar region and 8 points (4 red and 4 infrared) in the intravaginal pelvic floor region of PBM while the GS group will receive simulation application of PBM in the same number of vulvar and intravaginal points, in the same places where it was applied in the GPBM group. To see if 8 applications of photobiomodulation are really capable of reducing pain and improving sexual function in women with dyspareunia

Read the detailed description

Female sexual dysfunction is known as the disorder experienced by a woman when changes occur in her usual sexual behavior. It is estimated that between 16 and 40% of women suffer from some form of sexual dysfunction, and this percentage increases with age.1 Among the painful disorders, dyspareunia stands out, which is defined as pain perceived in the pelvis associated with sex with penetration. It can be applied to women and men. It usually occurs with penile penetration, but is often associated with pain during the insertion of any object. It can apply to anal and vaginal intercourse. It is classically subdivided into superficial, when it affects the vulva and vaginal entrance, and deep, when the painful area is the cervix, bladder and/or the lower part of the pelvis.2 Another classification divides it into primary, associated with pain at the beginning of sexual life, and secondary, when it appears later.3 It directly affects physical health, as well as sexual and mental well-being. Consequently, it can lead to depression, anxiety and low self-esteem in women who experience it.4 Studies show an association between hyperactivity of the pelvic muscles and dyspareunia, which can have a significant impact on physical and mental health, leading to problems such as depression, anxiety, hypervigilance to pain, negative body image and low self-esteem, in addition to the possibility of leading to other sexual dysfunctions.5 Multidisciplinary treatment is highly recommended in this population and aims to address the various physical, emotional and behavioral aspects involved in sexual dysfunctions. This approach involves the collaboration of a team made up of specialized professionals, such as gynecologists, physiotherapists, sex therapists, psychologists and/or psychiatrists. Among these professionals, physiotherapy stands out as an intervention capable of improving sexual health, through individualized approaches for each patient. Considering that many patients with dyspareunia do not respond adequately to conventional drug therapy, there is a clear need to seek new therapeutic alternatives, such as photobiomodulation (PBM). Previous studies show positive results in the use of PBM in improving pain related to musculoskeletal and arthritic conditions. Furthermore, the application of PBM in the area of pelvic physiotherapy has been expanded. A study carried out by Lev-Sagie et al.6 showed positive results in the use of photobiomodulation in women with vestibulodynia, in relation to pain. Previous studies also indicate that intravaginal application of PBM has been effective in alleviating pain in conditions related to chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis, and pelvic pain of myofascial origin, which suggests that photobiomodulation may be a promising therapy for women with dyspareunia.7 ,8,9 In recent years, research has been carried out to investigate the presence and increase of inflammatory mediators in different painful musculoskeletal disorders10-14. A study that applied photobiomodulation to patients with low back pain observed changes in some biomarkers, in plasma or microdialysate, indicating that patients with low back pain who receive photobiomodulation may present changes in the levels of inflammatory mediators.15 But to date, few studies have been carried out on this topic, none of them applied to women with dyspareunia The scarcity of studies standardizing an application protocol, which observes time of effect and analysis of inflammatory biomarkers in the use of photobiomodulation in women with dyspareunia, justifies the need for research on the topic. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare the effects of vulvar and intravaginal application of PBM compared to the sham group on the pain and sexual function of women with dyspareunia in the immediate post-intervention moments and in follow-ups of 15, 30, 90 and 180 days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dyspareunia
  • Pain
  • Sexual Dysfunction

Keywords

  • photobiomodulation
  • dyspareunia
  • sexual dysfunction
  • physiotherapy
  • pelvic pain
03

In context

Dyspareunia

158 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspareunia; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 63 across 126 interventional studies indexed under Dyspareunia.

Browse Dyspareunia studies →

Lead sponsor

Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre is the lead sponsor of 119 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women, aged between 18 and 45 years classified with dyspareunia criteria, according to the guidelines of the European Association of Urology guideline (2022)2, who report pain in relationship greater than 3 on the visual numeric pain scale at the beginning of participation in the research , who present sensitivity to unidigital palpation of the pelvic muscular wall (e.g., levator ani, coccygeus, obturator) and who report feeling pain during penetration for at least 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with a history of neurological or oncological diseases or bone fractures in the pelvic region, in addition to radiculopathies, decompensated heart disease or metabolic disorders, pregnant women, lactating women, women in menopause, women with difficulties in understanding written or spoken language, in use of photosensitizing drugs, who present an inflammatory condition or have used anti-inflammatories on the day of the evaluation, red flags (post-coital bleeding, abrupt unexplained weight loss, presence of a mass visible on ultrasound, macroscopic or microscopic hematuria), who have a diagnosis of painful bladder syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, interstitial cystitis, fibromyalgia. Who have a history of spine surgery or have undergone any surgical intervention with general anesthesia in the last 120 days. Who is currently undergoing pelvic physiotherapy treatment.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Photobiomodulation group (GPBM)

    The volunteers in the GFBM group will undergo 8 sessions of a combined red and infrared laser protocol with 4J of infrared power and 4J of red power. Being applied at 8 points (4 red and 4 infrared) in the vulvar region and 8 points (4 red and 4 infrared) points in the intravaginal pelvic floor region.

    Device: photobiomidulação

  • Placebo comparator
    Shan group (GS)

    The placebo control will be administered using the same device as the GFBM, but without any therapeutic dose delivery. Furthermore, the irradiated sites and irradiation time will be the same as PBMT. Volunteers will receive a total dose of 0 J in placebo mode. This treatment was also carried out in 8 sessions. For volunteers in the control group. There will be the possibility of them receiving treatment later if it proves effective in reducing pain.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Devicephotobiomidulação

    The volunteers in the GFBM group will undergo 8 sessions of a combined red and infrared laser protocol with 4J of infrared power and 4J of red power. Being applied at 8 points (4 red and 4 infrared) in the vulvar region and 8 points (4 red and 4 infrared) points in the intravaginal pelvic floor region. The MMO semiconductor laser device (GaA1As and InGaAlP) will be used with an area of the output laser beam at the NOZZLE of the laser pen of 3mm2 and wavelengths of 660nm (Red Laser) and 808nm (Infrared Laser) with a power of 100mW. The application will be carried out with the volunteers on a stretcher, in the supine position, gynecological position, with the knees and hips flexed and in abduction, feet supported on the stretcher.

  • OtherPlacebo

    The placebo control will be administered using the same device as the GFBM, but without any therapeutic dose delivery. Furthermore, the irradiated sites and irradiation time will be the same as PBMT. Volunteers will receive a total dose of 0 J in placebo mode. This treatment was also carried out in 8 sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual numeric pain scale (VNS)

    The number 0 represents no pain and, gradually, the increase in pain intensity is represented by the numerical increase on the scale (values from 1-3: mild pain; 4-6: moderate pain; and 7-10: severe pain). The primary outcome will be considered clinically significant if there is a reduction of at least 2 points in the overall severity of pain compared to baseline after 8 applications, in any of the time intervals measured.

    Time frame: The visual pain scale will be evaluated at the beginning and at the end of each laser application, in addition to being applied immediately after the intervention and in follow-ups of 15, 30, 90 and 180 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Female sexual function - IFSF

    The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a brief questionnaire, which can be self-administered, and which aims to assess female sexual response in six domains: sexual desire, sexual arousal, vaginal lubrication, orgasm, sexual satisfaction and pain. To do this, it presents 19 questions that assess sexual function over the last four weeks. For each question there is an answer pattern whose options receive scores from 0 to 5 in an increasing manner in relation to the presence of the function questioned. Only in questions about pain the score is defined inverted. A total score is presented at the end of the application, resulting from the sum of the scores for each domain multiplied by a factor that homogenizes the influence of each domain on the total score.

    Time frame: will be applied at six moments: before starting treatment, after the end of 8 treatment sessions and in follow-ups of 15, 30, 90 and 180 days.

  2. Quality of life - SF-36

    It consists of a multidimensional questionnaire made up of 36 items, encompassed in 8 scales or domains, which are: functional capacity, physical aspects, pain, general health status, vitality, social aspects, emotional aspects and mental health. It presents a score that ranges from 0 (zero) to 100 (obtained through Raw Scale calculation), where zero corresponds to the worst general state of health and 100 corresponds to the best state of health.

    Time frame: will be applied at six moments: before starting treatment, after the end of 8 treatment sessions and in follow-ups of 15, 30, 90 and 180 days.

  3. Inflammatory markers - IL6, IL10 and prostaglandins

    To observe the inflammatory status of the volunteers, the plasma concentration of IL-6 and IL-10 will be measured using the ELISA immunoassay method according to the manufacturer's instructions. To observe the inflammatory status of the volunteers, the plasma concentration of PGE2 - Multi-Format ELISA Kit - K051-H1 / K051-H5 will be titrated by ELISA assays as indicated by the manufacturer

    Time frame: will be applied pre-intervention, after 4 interventions and at the end of 8 interventions

  4. Satisfaction scale referred

    A satisfaction scale referred to with the treatment will be applied where the volunteer will have to give a number from 1 to 10 to how satisfied she is with the result of the treatment

    Time frame: It will be applied at the end of the 8 treatment sessions and in follow-ups of 15, 30, 90 and 180 days.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2024; primary completion for Jan 2027, 31 months later.

Of 51 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dyspareunia, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 31 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 59 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 11, 2024
First posted
Jun 14, 2024
StartEst.
Jun 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 2027
Last update
Jun 14, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 14, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06460415
Responsible party
Mariana Della Valentina Pessoa (Mariana Della Valentina Pessoa, Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 14, 2024
Start date
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 14, 2024

Study contacts

Mariana Della Valentina Pessoa
Contact
marianadvalentina@gmail.com
51992621176

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion