ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06456788BFMMRHCWUpdated May 6, 2025

Barriers and Facilitators to MMR Vaccination Among Healthcare Workers

An observational study in Measles, sponsored by King's College London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-06.

Sponsored by King's College London · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
23
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Measles is a highly contagious disease which can result in severe complications in some patients. Healthcare workers have a higher risk of getting measles than the general population because of their increased risk of exposure from patients with measles attending hospitals. Having had measles in the past or at least one dose of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine provides protection (immunity) against measles. UK government guidelines therefore recommend that healthcare workers and non-clinical staff with direct patient contact are fully vaccinated or have other evidence of immunity. Yet, evidence from recent measles outbreaks suggests that some healthcare workers are not immune or do not know if they are immune, with implications for containment efforts, cost and transmission. The purpose of this study is to identify barriers and facilitators to uptake of the MMR vaccine among healthcare workers at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (KCH). KCH healthcare workers will be eligible to take part in the study if they are aged 18 and over and have direct contact with patients. In addition, the research will focus on four subgroups of healthcare workers at KCH: those who are not immune, those who have not completed the full vaccination schedule, those who don't know their immunity status, those received the vaccine only after joining KCH. The latter may provide insights into facilitators to vaccine uptake. Measles immunity forms part of the occupational health screening at KCH. A series of semi structured interviews lasting approximately 1 hour will explore participants' experiences of the occupational health vaccine screening process and measles vaccine campaigns at KCH; why they are unvaccinated/not fully vaccinated/do not know if they are immune/decided to be vaccinated after joining KCH; and what measures or interventions may help healthcare workers when deciding whether to get the MMR vaccine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Measles

Browse trials for

03

In context

Measles

134 studies on the registry are indexed under Measles; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is below the median of 282 across 26 observational studies indexed under Measles.

Browse Measles studies →

Lead sponsor

King's College London is the lead sponsor of 520 studies on the registry; 126 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants will be recruited from a population of hospital-based healthcare workers, including doctors, nurses, health assistants, etc. Healthcare workers will be recruited from one site only (KCH).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Are aged 18 and over
  • Currently work as a healthcare worker at the Trust
  • Have direct contact with patients
  • Don't know if they have had measles and don't know if they have been vaccinated
  • Or: Have not had measles and have not received the MMR vaccine
  • Or: Have only received 1 dose of the MMR vaccine
  • Or: Received the MMR vaccine after joining the Trust

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are aged \<18 years old
  • Work in a role at the Trust that does not involve direct contact with patients (e.g., administrative or business staff)
  • Are sure and/or have evidence that they have had measles in the past or both doses of the MMR vaccine before joining the Trust
  • Are not able to give
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthcare workers

    Healthcare workers at one Trust who have direct patient contact and fall within one of four groups: 1) they are not immune to measles (have not had measles in the past and have not been vaccinated with both doses of the MMR vaccine), 2) they have not completed the full vaccination schedule (they have received only 1 dose of the MMR vaccine), 3) they do not know their immunity status, and 4) they received the MMR vaccine after joining the Trust.

    Biological: MMR vaccination

Interventions

  • BiologicalMMR vaccination

    MMR vaccination status

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Barriers to MMR vaccination

    Barriers to MMR vaccination will be explored in the qualitative interview

    Time frame: Collected at one timepoint 1 day during qualitative interview

  2. Facilitators to MMR vaccination

    Facilitators to MMR vaccination will be explored in the qualitative interview

    Time frame: Collected at one timepoint 1 day during qualitative interview

  3. Reasons for not knowing immunity status

    Reasons for not knowing immunity status will be explored in the qualitative interview

    Time frame: Collected at one timepoint 1 day during qualitative interview

Secondary outcomes

  1. Experiences of the occupational health vaccine screening process at KCH

    Experiences of the occupational health vaccine screening process at the Trust will be explored in the qualitative interview

    Time frame: Collected at one timepoint 1 day during qualitative interview

07

Study locations

1 site
  • King's College London
    London, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Pseudonymised interview transcripts will be uploaded onto the King's College London Open Research Data System with the participant's consent.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2024 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 3 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 30, 2024
First posted
Jun 13, 2024
StartActual
Sep 12, 2024
Primary completionActual
Dec 19, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 19, 2024
Last update
May 6, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06456788
Collaborators
King's College Hospital NHS Trust, UK Health Security Agency
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 13, 2024
Start date
Sep 12, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 19, 2024
Completion
Dec 19, 2024
Last update
May 6, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion