An observational study in Polyp of Colon and Colorectal Polyp, sponsored by King's College Hospital NHS Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-06.
Sponsored by King's College Hospital NHS Trust · Observational
Accurate classification of growths in the large bowel (polyps) identified during colonoscopy is imperative to inform the risk of colorectal cancer. Reliable identification of the cancer risk of individual polyps helps determine the best treatment option for the detected polyp and determine the appropriate interval requirements for future colonoscopy to check the site of removal and for further polyps elsewhere in the bowel.
Current advanced endoscopic imaging techniques require specialist skills and expertise with an associated long learning curve and increased procedure time. It is for these reasons that despite being introduced in clinical practice, uptake of such techniques is limited and current methods of polyp risk stratification during colonoscopy without Artificial intelligence (AI) is suboptimal. Approximately 25% of bowel polyps that are removed by major surgery are analysed and later proved to be non-cancerous polyps that could have been removed via endoscopy thus avoiding anatomy altering surgery and the associated risks. With accurate polyp diagnosis and risk stratification in real time with AI, such polyps could have been removed non-surgically (endoscopically). Current Computer Assisted Diagnosis (CADx, a form of AI) platforms only differentiate between cancerous and non cancerous polyps which is of limited value in providing a personalised patient risk for colorectal cancer. The development of a multi-class algorithm is of greater complexity than a binary classification and requires larger training and validation datasets. A robust CADx algorithm should also involve global trainable data to minimise the introduction of bias. It is for these reasons that this is a planned international multicentre study.
The Investigators aim to develop a novel AI five class pathology prediction risk prediction tool that provides reliable information to identify cancer risk independent of the endoscopists skill.
These 5 categories are chosen because treatment options differ according to the polyp type and future check colonoscopy guidelines require these categories
The use of artificial intelligence in computer-assisted detection (CADe) to detect polyps (pre-cancerous growths) during colonoscopy is gaining increasing interest and acceptance with multiple devices already in the mainstream market. The Investigator know already from work in other countries that detecting more polyps results in a reduced risk of bowel cancer for the patient having the procedure, in the years following their colonoscopy (ie. pre-cancerous growths were detected and removed). This has formed the basis of national bowel cancer screening programmes. With increased detection of colorectal polyps, there is a growing need to correctly identify the nature of the polyp to inform the risk of colorectal cancer with the polyp detected and also the potential future risk to the patient. Accurate polyp diagnosis is also required to determine the correct mode or removal-whether this does require removal at all (leading to conservation of costs and resources in a challenging current climate), whether endoscopic removal is possible and if so by what procedure, whether surgery is required.
Published data demonstrates that approximately one quarter of surgically removed colorectal polyps with patients undergoing major surgery were benign and therefore major surgery could have been avoided with these polyps removed endoscopically reducing the risk of complication and organ preservation for the patient.
Current polyp diagnosis techniques involve the use and interpretation of specialist dyes and magnification endoscopes which come with gaining expertise expertise with an associated learning curve and increased procedure time. It is for these reasons that despite being introduced in clinical practice, uptake of such techniques is limited and current methods of polyp risk stratification during colonoscopy without AI is suboptimal.
Current polyp diagnosis AI (CADx) algorithms are limited to smaller classification Current CADx platforms differentiate between cancerous and non-cancerous polyps which is of limited value in providing a personalised patient risk for colorectal cancer. The development of a multiclass algorithm is of greater complexity than a binary classification and requires larger training and validation datasets. A robust CADx algorithm should also involve global trainable data to minimise the introduction of bias. It is for these reasons that this is a planned international multicentre study
Prospective collection of data:
This study will be conducted alongside usual patient care, but will require research staff to enter data onto a secure web-based report form (REDCAP database). This means that participants will undergo exactly the same procedure, with no differences and no extra visits or data, than would have otherwise have occurred. Participants will be those patients that have been scheduled to have a colonoscopy for the standard reasons. Patients will be invited in the usual way for colonoscopy.
They may - where possible - be sent the PIS with their appointment letter (up to 6 weeks in advance). On arrival in the endoscopy unit, they will be approached by a member of the research team and given a copy of the PIS to read - up to an hour before their procedure. They will be provided face-to-face information and explanation, prior to written consent to allow their data to be collected in the database. As the study does not require any change or additional procedures, The investigator feel that an initial approach on arrival into the endoscopy unit will provide sufficient, appropriate time to consent, even if the PIS has not been read in advance (although it will be sent if possible). The only additional consideration will be the consent to recording of the video (no patient identifiable data will be transferred as part of this aspect).
Once the colonoscopy has been completed, there will be no additional visits.
377 studies on the registry are indexed under Colonic Polyps; 57 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 4,000 is above the median of 411 across 115 observational studies indexed under Colonic Polyps.
Browse Colonic Polyps studies →King's College Hospital NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 171 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All adult (over 18 years) presenting for screening or symptomatic colonoscopy
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
No intervention required from this study, however images will be obtained from patient presenting for colonoscopy
To achieve an overall accuracy of 85% for the five-classification lesion prediction algorithm.
Sensitivity and Specificity
Time frame: 24 months
Positive and negative predicted value
Assess the accuracy to the trained device
Time frame: 24 months
Interobserver agreement of the endoscopists' prediction of histology of polyps during the annotation process.
We will analyse the calculate the histology agreement between the advance endoscopist
Time frame: 36 months
Sub-analysis of the polyp characteristics focused on different gender and ethnicity.
To assess if the prediction of patient gender, ethnicity, and age is possible with use of the developed CADx model.
Time frame: 36 months
This will be a sub analysis of an AI algorithm that is trained to predict polyp histology using the prospective data cohort.
A qualitative analysis of CADx incorrect diagnoses will also be conducted by a multidisciplinary panel to evaluate potential impact
Time frame: 36 months
Learned effects of AI augmented endoscopy on endoscopist optical diagnosis
We will evaluate if the use of AI during colonoscopy can be a learning tools for endoscopist
Time frame: 36 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started May 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2025, 12 months after the start.
Of 52 non-industry observational studies under Colonic Polyps, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 90. This study's planned 12 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 62 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 90.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
King's College Hospital NHS Trust →