CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06436768Updated Apr 2, 2025

Efficacy and Safety of Sugammadex in Thoracoscopy Thymectomy for Chinese Adults With Myasthenia Gravis

An interventional study of Sugammadex and Neostigmine in Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade, sponsored by Beijing Tongren Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-02.

Sponsored by Beijing Tongren Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) undergoing thoracoscopic thymectomy faster recovery from a moderate neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium after reversal at reappearance of T2 by 2.0 mg/kg sugammadex compared to 50 ug/kg neostigmine.

Methods: A total of 64 patients with MG undergoing thoracoscopic thymectomy will be randomly divided into two groups: Sugammadex group (S group) and Neostigmine group (N group). The same anesthesia methods will be applied in both groups. Patients of S group will receive a dose of 2.0 mg/kg sugammadex after the last dose of rocuronium, at reappearance of T2. Patients of N group will receive a dose of 50 ug/kg neostigmine after the last dose of rocuronium, at reappearance of T2. The primary endpoint is time from start of administration of sugammadex or neostigmine to recovery of train-of-four stimulation ratio (TOFr) to 0.9. Secondary end points include time from start of administration of sugammadex or neostigmine to recovery of TOFr to 0.8 and 0.7, time to extubation, clinical signs of neuromuscular recovery, hemodynamic changes after muscle relaxation antagonism, adverse effects, time to operating room (OR) discharge, time to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge, and pulmonary complications within 7 days after the operation.

Read the detailed description

Due to neuromuscular transmission and functioning deficits, patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) are at increased risk of postoperative residual curarization (PORC), and may even develop into postoperative myasthenia crisis (PMC), which is a serious complication after thymectomy and increases the risk of death, with an incidence of up to 18.2%.

Effective reversal of neuromuscular blockade is crucial to ensure patient safety, reduce the incidence of PORC or PMC and prompt postoperative recovery. Traditionally, neostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, can be employed for neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) reversal. However, neostigmine is associated with potential drawbacks, such as delayed recovery and adverse muscarinic side effects.

Sugammadex, a selective relaxant binding agent, represents a relatively new alternative for NMBA reversal, specifically designed to encapsulate and inactivate aminosteroid NMBAs. The clinical benefits of sugammadex have been documented in several studies, demonstrating faster reversal of neuromuscular blockade and more predictable recovery profiles compared to neostigmine. However, the use of sugammadex in patients with MG remains an area of limited evidence. To date, to the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of prospective research to elucidate the application value of sugammadex in thymectomy in patients with MG.

This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial aimed at exploring the efficacy and safety of sugammadex compared to neostigmine for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade in patients with myasthenia gravis after thoracoscopic thymectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • neuromuscular blockade
  • Sugammadex
  • Neostigmine
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Postoperative Residual Curarization
03

In context

Myasthenia Gravis

324 studies on the registry are indexed under Myasthenia Gravis; 146 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is above the median of 44 across 212 interventional studies indexed under Myasthenia Gravis.

Browse Myasthenia Gravis studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Tongren Hospital is the lead sponsor of 154 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

    • Patients with MG scheduled for elective thoracoscopic thymectomy

      • Aged 18 to 65 years
      • American society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system: I - III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to obtain written informed consent
  • With severe renal or hepatic dysfunction
  • A plan to return to ICU with intubation postoperation
  • A family history of malignant hyperthermia
  • Suspected difficult airway
  • Allergy to medications involved in the study
  • A contraindication for neostigmine or sugammadex administration
  • The patient's arm is not available for neuromuscular monitoring
  • Patients receiving medication known to interfere with NMBAs (e.g., anticonvulsants, antibiotics, magnesium salts)
  • Pregnant or lactating patients
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sugammadex group (S group)

    After the last dose of rocuronium, at reappearance of T2, a dose of 2.0 mg/kg sugammadex was administered.

    Drug: Sugammadex

  • Active comparator
    Neostigmine group (N group)

    After the last dose of rocuronium, at reappearance of T2, a dose of 50 ug/kg neostigmine plus atropine 0.02 mg/kg was administered.

    Drug: Neostigmine

Interventions

  • DrugSugammadex

    After the last dose of rocuronium, at reappearance of T2, a dose of 2.0 mg/kg sugammadex was administered. Dose will be according to participant actual body weight.

    Also known as: S group

  • DrugNeostigmine

    After the last dose of rocuronium, at reappearance of T2, a dose of 50 ug/kg neostigmine (up to 5 mg maximum dose) plus atropine 0.02 mg/kg (up to 2 mg maximum dose) was administered. Dose will be according to participant actual body weight.

    Also known as: N group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recovery time

    The comparison of the recovery periods between groups when the start of administering reversal agent to the recovery of TOF ratio≥ 0.9

    Time frame: After operation within 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time from start of administration of sugammadex or neostigmine to the train-of-four stimulation ratio (TOFr) 0.8

    Muscle relaxation monitoring was performed with an accelero-myography (AMG) neuromuscular monitor by assessment of the TOF responses of adductor pollicis muscle to ulnar nerve stimulation every 15 seconds. T1 and T4 refer to the amplitudes of the first and fourth twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The TOFr, that is T4/T1 Ratio (expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) represents the extent of recovery from neuromuscular blockade (NMB). A faster time to TOFr 0.8 indicates a faster recovery from NMB.

    Time frame: After operation within 120 minutes

  2. Time from start of administration of sugammadex or neostigmine to the train-of-four stimulation ratio (TOFr) 0.7.

    Muscle relaxation monitoring was performed with an accelero-myography (AMG) neuromuscular monitor by assessment of the TOF responses of adductor pollicis muscle to ulnar nerve stimulation every 15 seconds. T1 and T4 refer to the amplitudes of the first and fourth twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The TOFr, that is T4/T1 Ratio (expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) represents the extent of recovery from neuromuscular blockade (NMB). A faster time to TOFr 0.7 indicates a faster recovery from NMB.

    Time frame: After operation within 120 minutes

  3. Extubation time

    The time period between administering a reversal agent to extubation

    Time frame: After operation within 60 minutes

  4. Time to discharge from the operating room

    The time period between administering a reversal agent to operating room discharge

    Time frame: After operation within 60 minutes

  5. Time to discharge from recovery room

    The time period between entering the recovery room amd discharge from recovery room

    Time frame: After operation within 120 minutes

  6. Incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB)

    Incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) (defined as a train-of-four ratio, TOFR \<0.9) measured 30 min after administration of the reversal agent.

    Time frame: After operation within 24 hours

  7. The incidence of adverse effects

    Unit: %; This value is a percentage. Any adverse effects in the operating room or in PACU include procedural pain, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, pruritus, reintubation, incision site complication, postprocedural nausea, vomiting, flatulence, procedural complication, insomnia, muscular weakness, headache, pharyngolaryngeal pain.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours after operation

  8. Number of patients who need rescue medication

    After extubation to prior to discharge from the recovery room, record the number of patients who need rescue medication because of clinical signs of residual paralysis (i.e. if a patient complain about muscle weakness, difficulty breathing, or oxygen desaturation ≤ 95%)

    Time frame: After operation within 24 hours

  9. The incidence of mean arterial blood pressure fluctuations ≥20%

    The proportion of patients in this group who experience mean arterial blood pressure fluctuation ≥ 20% within 30 minutes after administration of antagonists compared with before administration of antagonists

    Time frame: After operation within 24 hours

  10. The incidence of heart rate fluctuations ≥20%

    The proportion of patients in this group who experience heart rate fluctuation ≥ 20% within 30 minutes after administration of antagonists compared with before administration of antagonists

    Time frame: After operation within 24 hours

  11. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications

    Unit: %; This value is a percentage. Postoperative pulmonary complications include pneumonia; aspiration pneumonitis; atelectasis; respiratory failure; bronchospasm; pulmonary congestion; pleural effusion; pneumothorax.

    Time frame: Within the first 7 days after surgery

  12. Unplanned ICU hospitalization rate

    Unit: %; This value is a percentage.

    Time frame: 1 months after operation

  13. Hypoxemic events

    Blood oxygenation values will be measured using pulse oximetry from the time of PACU admission until discharge from the PACU

    Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of the PACU stay, an expected average of 2 hours, up to 7 days

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Beijing tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Beijing 100000, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210000, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cata JP, Lasala JD, Williams W, Mena GE. Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma Surgery: A Clinical Update for the Cardiothoracic Anesthesiologist. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Sep;33(9):2537-2545. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.07.036. Epub 2018 Jul 29. PubMed 30219643 ↗
  • Sheikh S, Alvi U, Soliven B, Rezania K. Drugs That Induce or Cause Deterioration of Myasthenia Gravis: An Update. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):1537. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071537. PubMed 33917535 ↗
  • Vymazal T, Krecmerova M, Bicek V, Lischke R. Feasibility of full and rapid neuromuscular blockade recovery with sugammadex in myasthenia gravis patients undergoing surgery - a series of 117 cases. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Oct 15;11:1593-6. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S93009. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26508869 ↗
  • van den Bersselaar LR, Gubbels M, Riazi S, Heytens L, Jungbluth H, Voermans NC, Snoeck MMJ. Mapping the current evidence on the anesthetic management of adult patients with neuromuscular disorders-a scoping review. Can J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;69(6):756-773. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02230-3. Epub 2022 Mar 23. PubMed 35322378 ↗
  • Fernandes HDS, Ximenes JLS, Nunes DI, Ashmawi HA, Vieira JE. Failure of reversion of neuromuscular block with sugammadex in patient with myasthenia gravis: case report and brief review of literature. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug 17;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0829-0. PubMed 31421671 ↗
  • No HJ, Yoo YC, Oh YJ, Lee HS, Jeon S, Kweon KH, Kim NY. Comparison between Sugammadex and Neostigmine after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery-Thymectomy in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Single-Center Retrospective Exploratory Analysis. J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 15;13(9):1380. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091380. PubMed 37763148 ↗
  • Schaller SJ, Lewald H. Clinical pharmacology and efficacy of sugammadex in the reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016 Sep;12(9):1097-108. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2016.1215426. Epub 2016 Aug 3. PubMed 27463265 ↗
  • Tsukada S, Shimizu S, Fushimi K. Rocuronium reversed with sugammadex for thymectomy in myasthenia gravis: A retrospective analysis of complications from Japan. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Aug 1;38(8):850-855. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001500. PubMed 34226417 ↗
  • de Boer HD, Shields MO, Booij LH. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex in patients with myasthenia gravis: a case series of 21 patients and review of the literature. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Dec;31(12):715-21. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000153. No abstract available. PubMed 25192270 ↗
  • Mouri H, Jo T, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Effect of Sugammadex on Postoperative Myasthenic Crisis in Myasthenia Gravis Patients: Propensity Score Analysis of a Japanese Nationwide Database. Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):367-373. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004239. PubMed 31124838 ↗
  • Fujimoto M, Terasaki S, Nishi M, Yamamoto T. Response to rocuronium and its determinants in patients with myasthenia gravis: A case-control study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Oct;32(10):672-80. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000257. PubMed 26086278 ↗
  • Lai HC, Huang TW, Tseng WC, Wu TS, Wu ZF. Sugammadex and postoperative myasthenic crisis. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.02.026. Epub 2019 Mar 12. No abstract available. PubMed 30875518 ↗
  • Keating GM. Sugammadex: A Review of Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal. Drugs. 2016 Jul;76(10):1041-52. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0604-1. PubMed 27324403 ↗
  • Petrun AM, Mekis D, Kamenik M. Successful use of rocuronium and sugammadex in a patient with myasthenia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Oct;27(10):917-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283392593. No abstract available. PubMed 20375901 ↗
  • Kiss G, Lacour A, d'Hollander A. Fade of train-of-four ratio despite administration of more than 12 mg kg(-1) sugammadex in a myasthenia gravis patient receiving rocuronium. Br J Anaesth. 2013 May;110(5):854-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet098. No abstract available. PubMed 23599531 ↗
  • Gurunathan U, Kunju SM, Stanton LML. Use of sugammadex in patients with neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review of case reports. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov 19;19(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0887-3. PubMed 31744470 ↗
  • Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 2008 Nov;109(5):816-24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee. PubMed 18946293 ↗
  • Blobner M, Eriksson LI, Scholz J, Motsch J, Della Rocca G, Prins ME. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex compared with neostigmine during sevoflurane anaesthesia: results of a randomised, controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Oct;27(10):874-81. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833d56b7. PubMed 20683334 ↗
  • Suy K, Morias K, Cammu G, Hans P, van Duijnhoven WG, Heeringa M, Demeyer I. Effective reversal of moderate rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex, a selective relaxant binding agent. Anesthesiology. 2007 Feb;106(2):283-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200702000-00016. PubMed 17264722 ↗
  • Reid JE, Breslin DS, Mirakhur RK, Hayes AH. Neostigmine antagonism of rocuronium block during anesthesia with sevoflurane, isoflurane or propofol. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Apr;48(4):351-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03014962. PubMed 11339776 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06436768
Lead sponsor
Beijing Tongren Hospital
Collaborators
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 31, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 5, 2025
Completion
Mar 5, 2025
Last update
Apr 2, 2025

Study contacts

Guyan Wang
study director · Beijing Tongren Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion