An interventional study of Motivational text messaging in Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by Washington State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-29.
Sponsored by Washington State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening
Alaska Native men have the highest rates of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in the US. Screening can prevent disease and improve survival. A previous study tested text messages to increase colorectal cancer screening in Alaska Native patients of the Southcentral Foundation healthcare system in Anchorage, Alaska. The intervention improved screening by 50% in women, but it had no effect in men. The current study aimed to culturally tailor the intervention for Alaska Native Men, and to test it with a randomized controlled trial among patients at the Southcentral Foundation.
Alaska Native men have higher colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality than any other US racial or ethnic group. Screening can prevent CRC and improve treatment outcomes by detecting disease in early stages, but Alaska Native men also have low CRC screening uptake. Colonoscopy is the most accurate CRC screening method and results in the most years of life saved. It only requires rescreening every 10 years, but it is a clinic- based procedure and needs extensive preparation. Other screening options include home-based tests that detect blood in the stool and require rescreening every year. More recently, a home-based method has been developed that tests stool for DNA indicative of CRC and requires rescreening every 3 years. Current guidelines recommend CRC screening for average risk adults starting between ages 45-50, but people at higher risk should start at younger ages. Many interventions have been developed to promote CRC screening. Among these, interventions that use text messaging or other electronic health messages to reach people outside of the clinical setting have shown promise for improving CRC screening. In a previous study, the research team developed an intervention that sends up to 3 text messages to Alaska Native people patients of the Southcentral Foundation (SCF) healthcare system in Anchorage, Alaska. The intervention was tested in a randomized controlled trial with 2,386 Alaska Native SCF patients ages 40-75. The intervention increased CRC screening by 50% in women, but it had no effect in men. The current study used a theory-based approach to culturally tailor the previous text message intervention for Alaska Native men. Investigators conducted a randomized trial to test the effectiveness of the tailored intervention with 998 Alaska Native men ages 40-75 who were active patients at SCF. Eligible men were identified from the electronic medical record and randomized in equal proportions to the control condition or to one of three intervention arms (messages only, messages plus gift card incentive, messages plus raffle incentive). The primary outcomes were completed CRC screening documented in the electronic medical record within 6 months of sending the first text message, and any scheduled visit for pre-screening or screening documented in the medical record during follow-up. The study obtained a waiver of consent, and no individuals were directly recruited or enrolled in the study. Follow-up was entirely ascertained through the electronic medical record, and cohort attrition was not applicable.
5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 998 is above the median of 77 across 4,123 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.
Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →Washington State University is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Usual care arm receives established methods for scheduling colorectal cancer screening with clinic patients.
Receives motivational messages to promote colorectal cancer screening plus usual care.
Behavioral: Motivational text messaging
Receives motivational messages to promote colorectal cancer screening, plus offer of a $50 gift card for completing screening, plus usual care.
Behavioral: Motivational text messaging
Receives motivational messages to promote colorectal cancer screening, plus offer of entry into a raffle for a prize worth approximately $200 if they complete screening, plus usual care.
Behavioral: Motivational text messaging
Intervention sends up to 4 motivational messages by text or email to Alaska Native men who are active patients and due for colorectal cancer screening. Incentive arms include promise of a $50 gift card or entry into a raffle for prize worth about $200 if they complete screening.
Number of Participants Who Completed Colorectal Cancer Screening
Screening procedure documented in the electronic medical record
Time frame: Six months
Number of Participants Who Scheduled a Screening-related Visit
Pre-screening or screening visit scheduled in the electronic medical record during follow-up
Time frame: Six months
The trial obtained a waiver of consent, and no individuals were directly recruited or enrolled. Screening-eligible men who met all other criteria were identified in the electronic health record and randomly sampled for inclusion in the study cohort.
| Milestone | Control | Messages | Gift Card | Raffle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 250 | 250 | 248 | 250 |
| Completed | 250 | 250 | 248 | 250 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Screening procedure documented in the electronic medical record
| Participants | Control | Messages | Gift Card | Raffle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any screening documented | 11 | 16 | 18 | 19 |
| No screening documented | 239 | 234 | 230 | 231 |
Pre-screening or screening visit scheduled in the electronic medical record during follow-up
| Participants | Control | Messages | Gift Card | Raffle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visit scheduled | 8 | 20 | 18 | 17 |
| No visit scheduled | 242 | 230 | 230 | 233 |
Collected over Six months, from date of randomization to end of follow-up. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0/250 (0%) | 0/250 (0%) | 0/250 (0%) |
| Messages | 0/250 (0%) | 0/250 (0%) | 0/250 (0%) |
| Gift Card | 0/248 (0%) | 0/248 (0%) | 0/248 (0%) |
| Raffle | 0/250 (0%) | 0/250 (0%) | 0/250 (0%) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Control | Messages | Gift Card | Raffle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Male | 250 | 250 | 248 | 250 | 998 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Control | Messages | Gift Card | Raffle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 250 | 250 | 248 | 250 | 998 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| White | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Previous screening(Participants) | Control | Messages | Gift Card | Raffle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previously screened | 36 | 40 | 36 | 40 | 152 |
| Not previously screened | 214 | 210 | 212 | 210 | 846 |
| Age, Customized(Participants) | Control | Messages | Gift Card | Raffle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40-44 years | 78 | 82 | 87 | 79 | 326 |
| 45-49 years | 47 | 47 | 40 | 47 | 181 |
| 50-54 years | 46 | 40 | 39 | 29 | 154 |
| 55-59 years | 29 | 29 | 26 | 32 | 116 |
| 60-65 years | 50 | 52 | 56 | 63 | 221 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Washington State University