ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06434012Updated Jul 17, 2026

Barts Endocarditis Research Registry

An observational study in Infective Endocarditis, Endocarditis and Endocarditis, Bacterial, sponsored by Queen Mary University of London. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-17.

Primary conditionEndocarditis, BacterialRegistry: EndocarditisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Endocarditis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Endocarditis, Bacterial
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Endocarditis, Bacterial, a narrower term within Endocarditis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Queen Mary University of London · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2019; still recruiting 7 years 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Barts Endocarditis Research Registry is being set up to give a unique opportunity to assess the characteristics of Infective Endocarditis (IE) in our population cohort, the current use of imaging techniques, as well as the implementation of the ESC guidelines and its consequence in terms of prognosis. All this will help improve the diagnosis and management of IE. The registry will also form the core of all our subsequent work, including interventional studies. The endocarditis research registry is to record the epidemiological, demographic, microbiological, surgical and outcome data in our cohort of endocarditis patients. This work will underpin all future work in endocarditis by clearly defining our patient cohort and the outcomes from treatment. We have a series of studies planned that we believe will influence the management of endocarditis (we are working up proposals for genomic and therapeutic trials that will subsequently be presented for ethical and hospital approval). The registry will be generic to all our planned studies, and will allow us to capture data to assess treatment effectiveness

Read the detailed description

This research registry will give us the unique opportunity to assess the characteristics of IE in our population cohort, the current use of imaging techniques, as well as the implementation of the ESC guidelines and its consequence in terms of prognosis. All this will help improve the diagnosis and management of IE. The registry will also form the core of all our subsequent work, including interventional studies.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but serious disease, associated with high morbidity and in-hospital mortality. Despite improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies the mortality remains at 15-30% in most published studies. The reasons for this persistent poor prognosis are numerous and include older patients with more severe disease, changes in the epidemiologic profiles and more patients with prosthetic or device related IE.

Following the formation of Barts Heart Centre (BHC) there was a sharp and noticeable increase in the number of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) referred to our centre. Recognising this change, the complexity of patients, and the coincident publication of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on Infective Endocarditis (2015), our Specialised Cardiology Directorate set up a new referral pathway, Standard Operating Procedure and Endocarditis Team meeting (MDT). The aim was to ensure focussed, consistent, and evidence-based care with joint medical and surgical input to this unique group of very unwell patients, with high inpatient mortality. In addition, the MDT would discuss and co-ordinate the care of all IE patients, with a weekly discussion of those on site, as well as at our referring hospitals. The MDT started in October 2015 and is composed of representatives from Cardiology (including imaging), Cardiac Surgery, Microbiology, Radiology/Nuclear Medicine and Pharmacy.

Since its inception, the MDT has discussed 367 patients at BHC and our wider referral centres (October 2015 - January 2018). Of those patients, 298 have been confirmed/probable as having IE: 144 surgically managed; 139 medically managed; 16 device extractions with intracardiac infection, all following international guidance. This does not include the grown-up congenital heart disease patients who are discussed and managed separately.

An audit database to track outcomes was started in January 2018, but there is a need to expand this work and make a registry that will form the foundation of all other research that we will undertake.

Mortality across the cohort has been at the lower end of international publications at 17.1% (51/298). Our current surgical mortality stands at 4.7% (14/298), which represents a significant reduction compared to pre-merger where combined mortality at the individual hospitals was 12.2%. In those patients who have died with medical management (37/51), the vast majority have had advanced life-limiting non-cardiac co-morbidities that preclude cardiac surgery (n=19) or on-going intravenous drug use after previous cardiac surgery for IE (n=6). Six patients have not been referred in time for surgery, having presented locally with septic shock and deteriorated rapidly, and this is an area of further education for our referring centres. Six patients have had operations without intra-operative evidence of infection. However, these patients had indications for surgery due to haemodynamically significant regurgitant valve disease.

Our morbidity and mortality reviews have allowed us to learn from all these cases, across all specialties and imaging modalities.

Not only has this approach led to improvements in patient care, but it has also raised the profile of BHC as a centre of special expertise. Our referring centres now include the DGH's of Barts Health NHS Trust (Whipps Cross University Hospital, Newham University Hospital, and The Royal London Hospital), plus many other district general hospitals in our locale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infective Endocarditis
  • Endocarditis
  • Endocarditis, Bacterial

Browse trials for

03

In context

Endocarditis, Bacterial Reclassified

22 studies on the registry are indexed under Endocarditis, Bacterial; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 588 across 10 observational studies indexed under Endocarditis, Bacterial.

Browse Endocarditis, Bacterial studies →

Lead sponsor

Queen Mary University of London is the lead sponsor of 253 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Compared within Endocarditis, Bacterial, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Endocarditis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

There are approximately 150 cases of endocarditis each year treated within the trust and recruitment is expected to be rapid

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Patients aged 16 and over (Patients under 16 years of age are not admitted to Barts Heart Centre)

      • Patients admitted to Barts Heart Centre with confirmed Endocarditis (see above)
      • Patients attending outpatients with confirmed/suspected Endocarditis
      • Patients with possible IE who complete treatment for endocarditis
      • Patients with cardiac device related Endocarditis
      • Patients with the ability to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Patients with pacemaker pocket infection with no evidence of pacemaker lead or valve infection

      • Patients who refuse consent to be included in the research database
      • Patients with "rejected" endocarditis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Otherregistry

    This is registry for Infective Endocarditis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To define current mortality rates for patients treated for endocarditis at Barts Heart Centre

    The primary goal of the endocarditis registry is to record the epidemiological, demographic, microbiological, surgical and outcome data in our cohort of endocarditis patients. This work will underpin all future work in endocarditis by clearly defining our patient cohort and the outcomes from treatment.

    Time frame: 10 years

  2. To define current morbidity rates for patients treated for endocarditis at Barts Heart Centre

    The primary goal of the endocarditis registry is to record the epidemiological, demographic, microbiological, surgical and outcome data in our cohort of endocarditis patients. This work will underpin all future work in endocarditis by clearly defining our patient cohort and the outcomes from treatment.

    Time frame: 10 years

  3. To define current rates of reinfection for patients treated for endocarditis at Barts Heart Centre

    The primary goal of the endocarditis registry is to record the epidemiological, demographic, microbiological, surgical and outcome data in our cohort of endocarditis patients. This work will underpin all future work in endocarditis by clearly defining our patient cohort and the outcomes from treatment.

    Time frame: 10 years

  4. To define current rates of relapse for patients treated for endocarditis at Barts Heart Centre

    The primary goal of the endocarditis registry is to record the epidemiological, demographic, microbiological, surgical and outcome data in our cohort of endocarditis patients. This work will underpin all future work in endocarditis by clearly defining our patient cohort and the outcomes from treatment.

    Time frame: 10 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. To collect data regarding infecting organism, valve appearances and pathological markers and investigate their relationship to mortality, morbidity, reinfection and relapse rates

    A secondary aim will be to use the registry to develop a series of observational studies, especially how the infecting organism interacts with the diagnostic indices in our labs and imaging protocols

    Time frame: 10 years

  2. To collect data regarding infecting organism and investigate its relationship to mortality, morbidity, reinfection and relapse rates

    A secondary aim will be to use the registry to develop a series of observational studies, especially how the infecting organism interacts with the diagnostic indices in our labs and imaging protocols

    Time frame: 10 years

  3. To collect data regarding valve appearance and investigate its relationship to mortality, morbidity, reinfection and relapse rates

    A secondary aim will be to use the registry to develop a series of observational studies, especially how the infecting organism interacts with the diagnostic indices in our labs and imaging protocols

    Time frame: 10 years

  4. To collect data regarding pathological markers and investigate its relationship to mortality, morbidity, reinfection and relapse rates

    A secondary aim will be to use the registry to develop a series of observational studies, especially how the infecting organism interacts with the diagnostic indices in our labs and imaging protocols

    Time frame: 10 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2029, 120 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 23, 2024
First posted
May 30, 2024
StartActual
Apr 24, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Apr 24, 2029
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2029
Last update
Jul 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06434012
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 30, 2024
Start date
Apr 24, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 24, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 17, 2026

Study contacts

Innocent Bvekerwa, MSc
Contact
i.bvekerwa@nhs.net
07852209005
Simon Woldman
Contact
simon.woldman@nhs.net
Simon Woldman, MSc
principal investigator · St Bartholomews Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion