CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06428175H2H-CYSHCNUpdated Sep 3, 2026

Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions (H2H-TCI) Children/Youth With Special Health Care Needs (CYSHCN)

An interventional study of Focused Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions and Extended Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions in Health Care, Pediatrics and Transitional Care, sponsored by Duke University. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
480
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of focused dose vs extended dose hospital-to-home Transitional Care Interventions (H2H-TCI) on health service use and parent-reported confidence for hospitalized CYSHCN. Aim 2: Compare the effectiveness of focused and extended dose H2H-TCI among vulnerable CYSHCN subgroups. Hypothesis: Both H2H-TCI arms will improve primary outcomes more for CYSHCN with higher versus lower clinical complexity; while extended H2H-TCI will better mitigate racial/ethnic outcome disparities than focused H2H-TCI. Aim 3: Evaluate implementation context, processes, and mechanisms via a multi-phase mixed methods study design.

Read the detailed description

Primary Aims Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of focused dose vs extended dose hospital-to-home Transitional Care Interventions (H2H-TCI) on health service use and parent-reported confidence for hospitalized CYSHCN.

Hypothesis: Extended H2H-TCI will be associated with lower acute care use and higher confidence than focused H2H-TCI.

Secondary Aims Aim 2: Compare the effectiveness of focused and extended dose H2H-TCI among vulnerable CYSHCN subgroups.

Hypothesis: Both H2H-TCI arms will improve primary outcomes more for CYSHCN with higher versus lower clinical complexity; while extended H2H-TCI will better mitigate racial/ethnic outcome disparities than focused H2H-TCI.

Aim 3: Evaluate implementation context, processes, and mechanisms via a multi-phase mixed methods study design.

The study populations consist of adult parent/caregivers' dyad and children/youth with special health care needs. Participants will be randomized to focused dose intervention after discharge or an extended dose intervention. the single dose will receive one phone call from an interventionist post discharge, the extended dose group will receive weekly phone calls for one month from an interventionist.

Analysis of data from the confidence-mediated and vulnerable patient/family characteristics-moderated pathways will address Aims 1 and 2, respectively.

During extraction of data from each site's Electronic Health Record (EHR) data security risks will be mitigated by following established standard operating procedures at Duke and the University of North Carolina (UNC). During preparation of site-based analytical datasets risks will be mitigated by limiting Protected Health Information (PHI) as much as and as early as is practical. All datasets will be stored and reviewed on a secure, cloud-based Protected Analytical and Computing Environment (PACE) at Duke and at UNC in the Secure Research Workspace (SRW).

The investigators will plan to create a Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) that includes expert clinicians who are not active study team members and are independent of the study sponsor. The DSMB will oversee the safety of volunteers participating in the study as needed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Health Care
  • Pediatrics
  • Transitional Care
  • Comparative Effectiveness
  • Family Engagement

Keywords

  • Special Needs
  • Hospital to Home Care
  • Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs
  • Randomized Trial
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • For this study, eligible children/youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) and adult parent/caregiver dyads will be those who meet the following inclusion criteria:

    1. Child is a CYSHCN, defined as having seen two or more distinct specialty areas for outpatient visits during the 12 months prior to index hospitalization admission date
    2. Age of hospitalized child is under 18 years old
    3. Child hospitalized on a general pediatrics inpatient service line at participating site
    4. Adult parent/caregiver for the child is 18 years or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child exclusion criteria:

    1. Child will be discharged to any location besides home (e.g., long-term care or residential facility, skilled nursing facility, inpatient acute rehabilitation, psychiatric facility)
    2. Child is a ward of the state or has an ongoing social services investigation
    3. Child is already receiving transitional care, intensive longitudinal care coordination (e.g., organ/disease-specific clinical program, clinical division within the same institution as the hospital [e.g., Children's Complex Care Program at UNC; Complex Care Service at Duke]), and/or longitudinal population health care coordination as part of a bundled alternative payment care model.
  • Parent/caregiver exclusion criteria include:

    1. Age less than 18 years old
    2. Diminished capacity to provide consent/participate
    3. Primary language for parent/caregiver is any language besides English or Spanish
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
480 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Focused Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions

    Behavioral: Focused Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions

  • Active comparator
    Extended Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions

    Behavioral: Extended Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions

Interventions

  • BehavioralFocused Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions

    Focused dose H2H-TCIs will consist of a one-time post-discharge phone call completed within 72 hours post-hospital discharge by a clinical interventionist (e.g., nurse care coordinator or care manager). Calls will follow a structured template that provides empirically supported core H2H-TCI functions (follow-up care access, contingency planning, medication review, family education). The interventionist will also conduct a pre-hospital discharge clinical needs assessment with the parent.

  • BehavioralExtended Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions

    Extended dose H2H-TCIs will include a pre-discharge clinical needs assessment and initial phone call within 72 hours post-discharge, similar to the focused arm. After the initial contact, the dose of the extended H2H-TCI will increase as subjects receive high-intensity support during weekly post-discharge phone contacts through 30 days post-discharge. All contacts in the extended dose arm will be completed by a transition coach interventionist (e.g., nurse care coordinator or care manager) who will be formally trained on pillars of the Care Transitions Intervention© (CTI), a multi-faceted H2H-TCI that is the basis for the extended dose arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 30-day acute care use

    30-day, all-cause composite readmission and emergency department (ED) visit rate

    Time frame: 30 days post-hospital discharge

  2. Caregiver confidence

    Change in caregiver-reported confidence that their child can avoid hospitalization within the next one month (1=not confident; 10=fully confident; \<5 is low confidence)

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 days post-discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. 7-day acute care use

    All-cause composite readmission and ED visit rate at 7 days

    Time frame: 7-days post-discharge

  2. 14-day acute care use

    All-cause composite readmission and ED visit rate at 14 days

    Time frame: 14 days post-discharge

  3. Readmissions

    All-cause readmission rate at 7, 14, and 30 days

    Time frame: 7, 14, 30 days post-discharge

  4. Emergency Department (ED) visits

    All-cause ED visits at 7, 14, and 30 days

    Time frame: 7, 14, 30 days post-discharge

  5. Outpatient follow-up visit attendance

    Completed outpatient visits by clinical area (primary, specialty, allied health)

    Time frame: 7, 14, 30 days post-discharge

  6. Days at home

    Annualized days without clinical visits (clinical days without healthcare visits)

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days post-discharge

  7. Caregiver strain

    Change in caregiver-reported strain (measured by scores on seven-item Caregiver Strain Questionnaire Short Form 7, CGSQ-SF7 survey), where a higher score indicates a higher level of caregiver strain.

    Time frame: Baseline, 7, 14, 30, and 90-days post-discharge

  8. Global health status

    Change in caregiver-reporter PROMIS global health status survey. PROMIS assessments are scored on a T-score metric. High scores mean more of the concept being measured. 10 points on the T-score metric is one standard deviation (SD). PROMIS scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population.

    Time frame: Baseline, 7, 14, 30, and 90-days post-discharge

  9. Caregiver mental health-related quality of life (HR-QOL)

    Change in caregiver-reported mental HR-QOL as scored on the Medical Outcomes Short Form 12 (SF12) survey.

    Time frame: Baseline, 7, 14, 30, and 90-days post-discharge

  10. Quality of hospital-to-home care transitions

    Pediatric Transition Experience Measure (P-TEM): eight-item, parent-reported measure of overall process and quality of hospital-to-home transitions.

    Time frame: 30 days post-discharge

  11. Fidelity

    Percentage of intervention core components delivered as planned (goal: ≥80%)

    Time frame: approximately 90 days post-discharge

  12. Feasibility Acceptability Appropriateness

    Clinical staff and caregiver-reported composite score responses to Feasibility of Implementation, Acceptability of Implementation, and Implementation Appropriateness surveys (4 items each)

    Time frame: approximately 90 days post-discharge

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • UNC Hospitals
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, United States
    Recruiting
  • DUHS
    Durham, North Carolina 27701, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06428175
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 24, 2024
Start date
Aug 28, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Study contacts

Jennifer Thomas, MPH
Contact
jennifer.thomas@duke.edu
(919) 613-5953
David Ming, MD
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion