CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06424054eChemoCoachUpdated May 21, 2024

Mitigating Toxicity by Electronic Health Portal-mediated Interactive Monitoring of Patient-reported Side Effects

An interventional study of eChemoCoach in Breast Cancer, eHealth and Symptom Monitoring, sponsored by Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-21.

Sponsored by Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
746
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chemotherapy induces side effects varying in severity, impacting patients' quality of life and necessitating unplanned hospital care. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) could aid in early detection and management of side effects. However, existing PRO monitoring lacks triage capabilities, leading to clinician involvement and suboptimal symptom management. The investigators propose eChemoCoach, an electronic questionnaire integrated into the electronic health portal, offering real-time symptom assessment and personalized advice based on CTCAE criteria. Our study aims to assess the impact of eChemoCoach on non-hematological CTCAE ≥ 3 graded side effects in early breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. This is a randomized controlled trial involving 746 patients that will evaluate the eChemoCoach's efficacy compared to standard monitoring. Phase one will validate questionnaires and assess usability, while phase two focuses on the primary outcome. Te investigators anticipate reduced severe side effects, thereby enhancing patients' quality of life, reducing stress, and minimizing hospital visits.

Read the detailed description

Problem description: The aim of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy is to increase survival. Therefore, treatment adherence is important. However, patients may experience treatment-related side-effects. In current practice, clinicians evaluate toxicity just a few days before the next chemotherapy is scheduled. Monitoring and timely anticipation of chemotherapy related side-effects may prevent escalation of toxicity, increase treatment adherence and reduce the decline in quality of life. Evaluating toxicity more frequently and on-demand could be a solution to reduce severe toxicity. Therefore, patients should receive a direct advice when experiencing side-effects. However, without interference of a health care professional, this is not possible in standard care.

Solution / research direction: There is increasing evidence that incorporating patient reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical care enhances symptom monitoring in cancer patients. Therefore, it is desirable to develop and investigate an electronic smart-phrased side-effects questionnaire which: 1) delivers a real-time personalized advice to the patient, based on CTCAE grading, after the questionnaire is completed and 2) is accessible for patients using an electronic health portal (EHP) of the electronic health record (EHR) to integrate the PRO data into the EHR.

Aim / hypothesis: To investigate the effect of adding weekly EHP-mediated monitoring of chemotherapy related side-effects based on CTCAE grading using smart-phrased electronic PRO side-effects questionnaires to standard of care monitoring of side-effects, on the occurrence of CTCAE >= grade 3 toxicity.

Plan of investigation: To conduct a pilot study to validate the smart-phrased ePRO side-effects questionnaire. Thereafter, a multicenter clinical randomized trial will start where patients with breast cancer qualifying for (neo)adjuvant chemo(immune)therapy will be randomized to real-time EHP-mediated monitoring of side-effects using a novel smart-phrased ePRO side-effects questionnaire in addition to standard of care monitoring, or to standard of care monitoring solely. Primary objective is the overall rate of CTC grade >=3 non hematological toxicity between both arms. Secondary objectives include relative dose intensity, health-related quality of life, experienced distress, the number of unplanned health care usage and costs.

Expected outcome: The investigators hypothesize that adding weekly EHP-mediated monitoring of side-effects using ePRO side-effects questionnaires will significantly lower the occurrence rate of CTCAE grade >=3 non-hematological toxicities.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • eHealth
  • Symptom Monitoring
  • Self Management

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer
  • remote monitoring
  • emonitoring
  • eHealth
  • symptom management
  • symptom monitoring
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 746 is above the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

    • Starting (neo)adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy for breast cancer according to one of the below mentioned treatment protocols:

      • Four cycles of doxorubicin 60mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 (AC) dose dense q 2 weeks, followed by twelve cycles of weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 (also in combination with carboplatin AUC6 q 3 weeks)
      • Nine cycles q 3 weeks of paclitaxel 80mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, carboplatin AUC 3 on day 1 and 8, trastuzumab 8mg/kg loading dose (followed by doses of 6mg/m2 at subsequent cycles) on day1 and pertuzumab loading dose of 840mg (followed by doses of 420mg at subsequent cycles) on day 1
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • WHO PS ≤1
  • Capable of using the EHP or get help in case of low (e-)health literacy. This includes being capable of login using DigiD, a system used by the Dutch government to verify the identity of a person
  • Being able to read or get help from a relative in case of illiteracy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Participation in a trial with an investigational product (because more frequent and structured symptom reporting is performed in these studies).
  • Patients who have been treated with chemotherapy in the past (since these patients are at higher risk for developing side effects of current chemotherapy).
  • Patients that already started with their chemotherapy cycle
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
746 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    eChemoCoach Group

    Patients assigned to the intervention arm fill in the eChemoCoach questionnaires. They will be asked to report their side effects at baseline (2 - 4 days before their first chemotherapy cycle) and weekly thereafter. Moreover, they can report their symptoms at any time in case of potential toxicity, with a maximum of once a day. Non-responders receive reminders. Both intervention and control groups receive standard monitoring and coaching, including pre-scheduled checks for side effects before chemotherapy. Patients in both groups are asked to complete questionnaires measuring the impact on HRQoL, anxiety, distress, and patient empowerment at baseline, 10 weeks, and 20 weeks post-chemotherapy initiation. Usability of the eChemoCoach will be assessed through an online survey for patients and healthcare professionals using the System Usability Scale

    Other: eChemoCoach

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Patients in the control group receive standard of care. Both intervention and control groups receive standard monitoring and coaching, including pre-scheduled checks for side effects before chemotherapy. Patients in both groups are asked to complete questionnaires measuring the impact on HRQoL, anxiety, distress, and patient empowerment at baseline, 10 weeks, and 20 weeks post-chemotherapy initiation.

Interventions

  • OthereChemoCoach

    the eChemoCoach is an electronic questionnaire which is accessible for patients via the secured electronic health portal (EHP) of the EHR, which is CE-certified. By utilizing the eChemoCoach, patients (for this project we focus on breast cancer patients) have the ability to complete a questionnaire on a daily basis, when experiencing side effects. The eChemoCoach has the potential to evaluate the severity of adverse effects based on the CTCAE criteria and triage them, mimicking the decision-making process of a HCP through computer adaptive testing (CAT). Upon completing the questionnaire, the eChemoCoach translates the responses for each specific side effect into corresponding CTCAE grades. The tool then promptly offers patients personalized advice, tailored to their individual condition.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The occurrence of any non-hematological side effects grade ≥3

    The occurrence of any non-hematological side effects grade ≥3 during neo-adjuvant or adjuvant treatment

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks after start chemotherapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Toxicity patterns

    Time to occurrence of both grade 2 and grade ≥3 toxicity will be analyzed with a Kaplan-Meier curves. Occurrence of grade 2 side effects during (neo)adjuvant will be presented as numbers with percentages for patients in both study groups.

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks after start chemotherapy

  2. Relative dose intensity (RDI)

    For analyzing the RDI, the RDI will be calculated for each chemotherapeutic agent and presented as mean with standard deviations (SD) (for a description of calculation of the RDI see the objective section paragraph 2.0). The RDI will be calculated per cycle. The RDI will be compared between the intervention and the control group.

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks after start chemotherapy

  3. HRQOL

    Health-related quality of life measured by the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30s). Scale is ranging from 1 to 4. 1 = not at all, 4 = very much. Higher scores mean a worse QOL.

    Time frame: on baseline, 10 and 20 weeks after start of chemotherapy

  4. Patient experienced anxiety

    Patient experienced anxiety measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Scale is ranging from 0 to 3. 0 = often, 3 = never. Higher scores means a less worse Hads score.

    Time frame: on baseline, 10 and 20 weeks after start of chemotherapy

  5. Patient empowerment

    Patient empowerment using Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) questionnaire. Ranging from 0 to 3. 0 = I do not agree, 3= I totally agree. A lower score is worse.

    Time frame: on baseline, 10 and 20 weeks after start of chemotherapy

  6. Patient experienced stress

    Patient experienced stress using a distress thermometer. Ranging from 0 to 10 per problem. 0 = no problem, 10 = worst. A higher score means more stress.

    Time frame: on baseline, 10 and 20 weeks after start of chemotherapy

  7. Unplanned Care

    The amount of unplanned hospital care will be presented as median (IQR) and will be analyzed by comparing the number of admissions, unplanned visits, days of hospital admissions between the intervention and control group using Poisson regression analysis.

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks after start chemotherapy

  8. Validation of eChemoCoach questionnaires

    Cognitive interviews will be analyzed with thematic content analysis. Agreement between professional triage estimations and eChemoCoach will be quantified using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. A semi qualitative assessment will be conducted, comparing the patient-reported adverse effects using eChemoCoach with medical professionals' CTCAE severity assessments. Interviews will be analyzed with thematic content analysis.

    Time frame: During the first year of the study

  9. Usability

    The System Usability Scale will be used for global assessment of the eChemoCoach. usability. Usability will also be assessed by healthcare professionals from participating. sites. The SUS is a 10 item questionnaire with 5 response options. Ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The average SUS score from all 500 studies is a 68. A SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average.

    Time frame: After inclusion of all intervention patients

  10. Agreement eChemoCoach-reported grades and those reported by PRO-CTCAE, HCPs, and the Dutch translation of CTCAE

    To assess the concordance among eChemoCoach-reported grades, PRO-CTCAE, and CTCAEs graded by healthcare professionals (HCPs), we employ the eChemoCoach platform for patient experienced symptom data collection. Each questionnaire administered includes the eChemoCoach and the PRO-CTCAE questionnaire, facilitating immediate and direct comparison of both outcomes. HCPs will document symptom grading in patient files using standardized CTCAE forms. HCPs will grade the severity on pre-planned checks (standard of care) and when necessary in case of severe side effects.

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks after start chemotherapy

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06424054
Lead sponsor
Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep
Collaborators
Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands, University of Twente, Dutch Cancer Society, Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep
Responsible party
Mathijs Hendriks, MD (Principal investigator, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 21, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
May 21, 2024

Study contacts

Manon Hanrath-Komen, PhD
Contact
m.m.c.komen@nwz.nl
0031 72 5482872
Rubin Verduin, drs
Contact
rjt.verduin@nwz.nl
0625289930

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion